Preview

Stolen Valor Act Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stolen Valor Act Case Study
Abel Fields’s openly stood in front of a crowd to talk to them about safety and Fields’s said that he served eight terms in the military which he also stated that he had received a Purple Heart when he had never served in the military or received a Purple Heart. Abel Fields’s was convicted because he lied about serving in the military and lied about receiving a Purple Heart which is against the Stolen Valor Act.
The Stolen Valor Act was made in 2006. This act made it a crime to make false claims about receiving many types of military awards. It established fines and prison sentences as punishment.
Abel Fields’s was found guilty in his first trial and he appealed his sentence. The court of appeals overturned his conviction, but then the government
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cop Keating Case Study
    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cop Keating Case Study

    COP Keating was established in a remote location near the town of Kamdesh of Nuristan province in North Eastern Afghanistan approximately 25 km from the Pakistan boarder along the only improved dirt road in the Kamdesh district. OP Fritsche was established 2.2 Km straight line distance to the southeast, non-line of sight with an elevation difference of 2150 ft. from Keating. The COP was surrounded by extremely rugged, mountainous high ground and is positioned to interdict historic trafficking routes to and from Pakistan.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    CJA/474 Case Study: Officer Robert Barton
    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    CJA/474 Case Study: Officer Robert Barton

    A subculture with a department can be a harmful thing if the culture violates policy. Officer Robert Barton is afraid to speak up, fearing that he will be excluded from the gang task force. The values and attitudes within the unit have probably been entrenched for several years, and every new member is probably too afraid to go against the grain. Even though the officers know what they are doing is illegal at times, they will continue to do it because that is the…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Betts V. Gideon Case Analysis
    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Betts V. Gideon Case Analysis

    In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hurst V. Florida Case Study
    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hurst V. Florida Case Study

    2. The petitioner, Timothy Hurst, was convicted of first degree murder and the jury recommended the death penalty to the judge in Florida, who then sentenced Hurst to death. Hurst appealed to the Florida Supreme Court and was granted resentencing. The Florida Supreme Court rejected Hurst’s argument and reaffirmed his sentence. The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study
    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

    In the groundbreaking case Gideon vs. Wainwright we are given a prime example of a Supreme Court case and its impact on federalism. Gideon was accused of felony burglary charges after an eyewitness placed him at the scene of a robbery. Although there was no evidence of him committing the crime, police arrested him and charged him with the theft based solely on an eye witness report. The sequences of events that would follow would change the way states were ordered to provide due process and create a fair and balanced trial for all felony trials.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas Yarris Research Paper
    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nicholas Yarris Research Paper

    After being wrongfully charged with murder, rape, and abduction, Nicholas Yarris became the 140th person in the United States to be exonerated by post-conviction DNA testing. He was initially sentenced to death as the result of his conviction but became excluded from all biological evidence connected to the crime by successive rounds of DNA testing.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    White Collar Crime Case Study
    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages

    White Collar Crime Case Study

    In this case well no he didn’t do. 2) Next is concealment, this one he did do by compiling mass amounts of paperwork, and case files from not only the U.S. government, but other companies and governments as well. 3) The third is violation of trust, or abuse of power, and trust. This one is a little tricky because of the law that states on the theft, compiling and use of government documents. He had the power to view these documents and the trust from the government to see such thing so when he went out on a limb and published those in a webpage format then he violated this rule, or element. The other thing is that he is NOT a citizen of the U.S. therefore the first amendment right would not apply to him. Because of this; it is an American document, and doctrine. So implies the Espionage act which he falls under and has violated. So the final question in this topic is he a criminal, well yes he is because of the amount of data, and the amount of sensitive information that he and his team has exposed. White collar crime yes because he leaked in cyber form information that could cause harm, and damages to a nation, person, or group. The tricky part is the prosecution of this case because of the international retaliation act, and the whistleblowers law at here in the U.S. both of these can be seen as a a way to allow him to continue processing…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Scottsboro Boys Research Paper
    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Scottsboro Boys Research Paper

    Then, a surprise from the prosecution: they dropped Powell's rape charge, but he was convicted and given 20 years for his assault on the deputy. Immediately afterwards, the court dropped the rest of the charges against the remaining four men. Eugene Williams, Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson and Roy Wright were set free.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 8 Go Ahead And Kill Me Jeffrey Dahmer
    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of 8 Go Ahead And Kill Me Jeffrey Dahmer

    His defence for the Smart family murders was that the father had killed the family and then himself. Although the judge was impressed with his courtroom skills he was unable to convince the jury of his innocence. They found him guilty and a few short months later he was hanged.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roland Freisler's Trial At Volksgericht
    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roland Freisler's Trial At Volksgericht

    On Monday, February 22, 1943 at 10:00 A.M., Hans and Sophie Scholl, along with Christoph Probst, were given trial at Volksgericht or, the People’s Court. This court regularly convicted a defendant and sentenced the person to death. The three were judged by Roland Freisler.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Essay
    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Essay

    In 1847, the St. Louis courthouse ruled against Scott but he was given the right to a second trial. In 1850, in the second trial, the jury decided that the Scotts should be freed. Mrs. Emerson did not want to lose the Scotts, so she appealed her case to the Missouri State Supreme Court. The Missouri State Supreme Court reversed the decision in 1852. In St. Louis Federal Court, Dred Scott sued Mrs. Emerson’s brother, John Sanford. The Court ruled in favor of Sanford. Dred Scott appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    GOVERNEMNT
    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    GOVERNEMNT

    Abel Fields falsely claimed he has received a purple heart for his bravery. He never served in the military. He never received a military reward. He was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act and sentenced to a fine. Fields was found guilty in his first trial. He appealed the sentence. Court of appeals overturned his conviction. The government appealed the decision of court of appeals. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Fields claims the right to lie about this award is protected by the first amendment. Fields did not harm another person through his claim. Fields did not receive anything valuable because of the claim. Prosecutioner claims the lie was made intentionally, so it should not be protected. Lies about the reward damage the integrity of the award. False claims make the award less valuable for actual recipients.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case brief
    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    case brief

    Petitioner was convicted of murder and sentenced to 20 years. This was directly sent to the Texas State Court of Appeals who rejected the argument. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals took up the case and affirmed the same judgment.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act

    In 1936 was when the act was first put into place against Hubert Moore. Moore was convicted five times for various criminal acts. The Attorney General filed for Moore to be sterilized. When Moore and the other inmate caught word of this they rioted. The riot was so big that many inmate were injured and some escaped including Moore. With Moore on the loose the Attorney General filed for another criminal to be sterilized and this was Jack Skinner. Skinner was convicted three different times. “In 1926 Skinner was convicted of stealing three chickens and sentenced to the State Reformatory. In 1929 he was convicted of armed robbery and returned to the Reformatory. In 1934, he was again convicted of armed robbery but this time sent to the Oklahoma state penitentiary (Skinner v. Oklahoma - Oklahoma Prisoner Sterilization)”. When Skinner heard about this instead of rioting he brought this to court. The Skinner v. Oklahoma was one of the first US Supreme Court cases to introduce the concept of strict scrutiny analysis as a means to evaluate the constitutionality of laws (Gur-Arie). Skinner was prosecuted under the act in front of a jury which he lost. The case was appealed by Skinner's lawyers to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. His lawyers argued that the act is violating the fourteenth amendment. The Court ruled against the appeal and the majority was in favor of the Sterilization Act. The court was five votes…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda Decision
    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda Decision

    Miranda was convicted of the armed robbery, but his attorneys appealed the case on the grounds that Miranda did not understand that he had the right against self-incrimination.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics