3) When Stonehenge was built, the summer solstice Sun rose beside the Heel Stone (due to the precession of the equinoxes)…
Stonehenge took over a millennium to build where the pyramids took twenty years. The Egyptians brought stone from hundreds of kilometres away and the stone was not large in comparison to Stonehenge. Egypt had more manpower for the task of building these megalithic structures, as the people were concentrated in a closer area. Whereas in Britain, the population was largely scattered and labor to help build Stonehenge was less concentrated. Stonehenge was used only for religious ceremony, whereas the pyramids were used for ceremonies and burials for numerous amounts of important Egyptian people. Stonehenge was an above ground structure whereas the pyramids had an underground burial…
Large stone slabs called megaliths were rolled by tree trunks into place. It is a post-and-lintel building. The large megaliths in the center are over 20 feet tall and form a horseshoe surrounding a central flat stone. The structure is oriented toward the sunrise on the longest day of the year, and may also predict eclipses.…
The material is presented in three parts. The first section introduces students to archaeology and pseudoarchaeology (literally “fake archaeology”), along with the basic concepts of science and anthropology that are necessary for a full understanding of both of these pursuits. In the second part, we apply the lessons of the first section to a series of pseudoarchaeological claims, ranging from the Cardiff Giant and Piltdown hoax to Atlantis and the Crystal Skull. We ask why do people make such claims, and why does the public embrace them? The third part surveys the real marvels of the ancient past, from Easter Island and Machu Picchu to Stonehenge and the Great Zimbabwe. We…
Megaliths: Structures & complexes of very large stones constructed for ceremonial & religious purposes in Neolithic times.…
Studying artifacts is like looking through a keyhole into the past. Although artifacts themselves cannot speak, a lot can be learned from studying primary documents and artifacts. For thousands of years, historians have been using primary documents and artifacts to make inferences about the people, places, and events that surrounded the time period. In our study of the Rixford Cemetry, we were able to use primary documents and artifacts to make analyses about the surrounding area.…
Despite the fact that the quarry was around in the 1840s, to provide bath stone to help the development of the historic city of Bath, the tunnels themselves were formed some years later under the control of the MOD. So it was the early nineteen hundreds before the tunnels first appeared in their current form.…
An interesting aspect involved with the Mound Builders were the way they were discovered and analyzed. When first discovered by the settlers of the New World, the mounds were a complete mystery. The English had refused to believe that they were built by the Native Americans. Because of nationalistic mindset the settlers possessed, they had an overwhelming sense of superiority over the Native Americans. Because of this mindset, the natives were given no credit for the construction of the mounds. Instead there were theories invented to explain the emergence of these structures, many of which were completely ludicrous. One explanation involved saying that the earthworks were made by the 10 Lost Tribes of Israel. Then divine punishment ensued when they were taken over by the white man and vanished from the Earth. As one can see, religion played a large role in impeding the truth about the true origin of the earthworks.…
Alexander, C. (2008, June). If the stones could speak: Searching for the meaning of Stonehenge. National Geographic.…
Henig, Martin. "British Archaeology, No 51, February 2000: Features." CBA Home | The Council for British Archaeology. Ed. Simon Denison. 15 Feb. 2000. Web. 2 Dec. 2010. .…
Furthermore, this kind of sheep-like acceptance of scientific interpretation is something Barbara Bender contests as a major factor in how Stonehenge is individually viewed. According to her reckonings, a prominent Stonehenge scholar could come out with an announcement describing the long awaited meaning of Stonehenge as a temple to the indigenous Great Bustard. The bird, the historian argues, would likely have been around in Neolithic times and in times of scarcity would have sustained Neolithic people as an easy food source. Thus, they built Stonehenge to be in the circular shape of a bird egg or nest and evidence of feasting pits around Stonehenge show they were giving thanks to the Great Bustards’ sacrifice. Rooted in the factual feasting…
P1 Explain The Role Of Effective Communication And Interpersonal Interaction In A Health And Social Context…
There was seen in a churchyard, against the high altar, a great stone four square, like unto marble stone; and in the midst thereof was like an anvil of steel a foot on high,…
Stonehenge, I'm not sure what I expected to find when I went there. Its been so long that since…
Description: The Parthenon has the reputation of being “the most perfect Doric temple ever built.” And by looking at it with the naked eye, one could most certainly agree. A closer look at the Parthenon’s structure and proportions reveals that there is not a single straight line within the temple; that small fact alone is what sparked my interest in this topic. The genius architects truly out did themselves with the clever use of optical refinements to create a structure that truly resembled perfection. This section will examine the architectural uses of entasis and the various other methods of optical trickery present in the Parthenon. The skillful approach at these methods by the architects is responsible for the aesthetic perfection of the structure. In addition, I will explore the geometric irregularity that starts at the base, or stylobate of the structure and is a common theme carried on throughout the Parthenon. The temple begins with a foundation that is only of rectangular origin and more resembles a dome shaped floor. I will continue to explore the slight adaptions made by Iktinos and Kallikrates to further perfect the internal structure of the temple. These adaptions include small details of varying column diameter and spacing due to the positioning and lighting of the columns in reference to the structure. These minute modifications and illusions created by the architects were able to keep the Parthenon’s structure seemingly perfect regardless of the time of day, or angle the structure was being viewed from. Lastly, I will explore even more subtle features that truly awe the minds of admirers. These include the…