Preview

Stop and Frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
514 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stop and Frisk
Mark Shearer
3/24/2009
PA 241

Essay response for Spring Break 2009

The first thing to take into account is the actual number of arrests using the given statistics. This means that in 2002 there were 11,446 arrests compared to 20,330 arrests made in 2008. During this time the total population only grew by about 300,000 citizens or about 1.5%. The increase of arrests was definitely due to policy change, as is illustrated when comparing population growth numbers by the increase in people actually stopped and those arrested.

Current law allows police officers to conduct stop and frisk searches of persons based on reasonable suspicion, as determined by Terry v. Ohio where supreme court decisions determined that individuals can be searched not only for probable cause (where an individual is under suspicion of committing a specific crime) but also for reasonable suspicion (where an individual is thought to be taking part in of have taken part of a crime, using facts and beliefs at hand which a reasonable inferences can be drawn from). In these instances, a pat down can be done only for the search of weapons for the preservation of the officers’ safety. The officer can not manipulate objects not believed to be weapons in order to determine if they are other illegal substances (Minnesota v. Dickerson). Additionally the police need to notice something in you actions that makes you suspicious (Rogers v. Arizona). The police can not stop a person because of protected status such as race, gender etc. When police are conducting an investigation, you have to cooperate with them or you might be arrested as well (Hiibu v. Nevada).

These are some of the tools and restrictions which police officers are using to perform arrests. There is now another issue which must be discussed. Why is there such a high ratio of blacks stopped when compared to the population ratio? The first reason can be found by noticing the suspects described as committing the crimes in the first

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The 2011 statistics of the Stop-And-Frisk policy reiterated the racist tendencies, predominantly against Blacks, within the state institution of policing during the era of neoliberal justice. The reported Stop-And-Frisk incidences in 2011 numbers are as follow; there were a total of 685,724 incidents reported, Blacks contributed 53% or 350,743 reported incidents to the total, and whereas Whites contributed to…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) What police procedures are used during arrests, and how do these procedures lead people to feel confused, fearful, and dehumanized?…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Stop, question, and frisk” is a controversial practice that was used by the New York City Police Department, where a police officer would stop any person acting suspicious, the police officer would question them and if they felt that it rose to the level of reasonable suspicion; they would frisk them for weapons and other contraband. In other states it is known as the Terry stop. Stop-and-frisk was a useful tactic for the NYPD because statistics show that violent crime dropped while this procedure was in place.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “stop and frisk” or “Terry frisk” law is one of the most controversial laws in America. The law came about via a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest. This only holds if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the suspect maybe presently armed and or dangerous. The coming about of this law all started with a concealed weapons arrest in Cleveland, Ohio in the early 1960’s.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes I feel as though some officers take it for far and do things that they shouldn't. If someone knows what's wrong and right they would know better than to go out and do something dumb. I feel as though the stop and frisk is something can be helpful to people everywhere. If someone knows they aren't doing anything wrong or have any weapons on them then there should not be a problem. They should go along with the officer and do whatever is asked and there will not be a problem. It becomes a problem when people do not cooperate and want to start fighting back. Officers are just trying to do their job and protect everyone. Sometimes they can be wrong about who they stop but at least know that person knows what they were doing is suspicious and not good to do around. The case took long to process because it was hard trying to figure out if the officer had the right to seize the weapon. In order to search someone you have to have probable cause. The court then denied the motion to suppress and Terry and Chilton pleaded not guilty. The judge then determined that they were…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk policy

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our first artifact that we chose to demonstrate for our research project is an article from the Denver Post which pertains to Stop and Frisk in Colorado and how hardly any racial data exists. It states that ten thousands of people in Colorado are stopped each year and most often they are frisked for weapons but yet their departments provide brief information about who is being stopped or why. These policies and data collection regarding the use of this investigative technique vary from city to city. Out of the five largest cities in Colorado, only two collect demographic statistics on these so called field-interview reports.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current law allows police officers to conduct stop and frisk searches of persons based on reasonable suspicion, as determined by Terry v. Ohio where supreme court decisions determined that individuals can be searched not only for probable cause (where an individual is under suspicion of committing a specific crime) but also for reasonable suspicion (where an individual is thought to be taking part in of have taken part of a crime, using facts and beliefs at hand which a reasonable inferences can be drawn from). In these instances, a pat down can be done only for the search of weapons for the preservation of the officers’ safety. The officer cannot manipulate objects not believed to be weapons in order to determine if they are other illegal substances (Minnesota v. Dickerson). Additionally the police need to notice something in your actions that makes you suspicious (Rogers v. Arizona). The police cannot stop a person because of protected status such as race, gender etc. When police are conducting an investigation, you have to cooperate with them or you might be arrested as well.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A police officer who reasonably suspects a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony, stops and questions that person. If the officer feels the suspects he or she is in danger of physical injury. I personally disagree with “Stop and Frisk” because of the way how the cops approach a person and assume who is a danger to others and to themselves. Stop and Frisk is one of the biggest issue for New Yorkers because it has increased so much, which was also bringing up a lot of controversial issue. For example, racial issues, cops abusing their authority, and…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stop and Frisk for Law

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In America, police targeting black people for excessive and unwarranted search and seizure is a practice older than the Republic itself. Ethnicity and stop and frisk laws have called for the attention of the courts to determine whether it is an abuse of power and whether minorities are the majority when pertaining to stop and frisk laws. This research will focus on the effects ethnicity has on stop and frisks laws.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    police are allowed to use so called " stop and frisk " searches, so long as they have reasonable…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cases of police brutality are disproportional to the races of the public. African Americans are 3 times more likely to be killed by the police than white people. In 2015, of the African Americans killed, 30% of them were unarmed while 19% of white people, who were killed by the police, were unarmed. The American Civil Liberties Union found that from 2007-2010, blacks were 63% of Boston’s civilian encounters, though blacks are 25% of the Boston population. Of these encounters, 75% of them had essentially no justification by police officers for performing them. Police officers would simply categorize these encounters as “investigate person.” Officers would specifically target certain races, and come up with an excuse to use deadly force. Many…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In America there have been multiple tyrannical actions that the government have used on citizens and innocent bystanders. One of these actions are called “Stop and Frisk” which is a prevalent tactic used, especially in New York. “Stop and Frisk” means to be randomly searched by police or high authority when they suspect a bystander is carrying something suspicious. “Stop and Frisk” is a political issue that has been a concern for a long period of time. According to the articles “Growing up with Stop and Frisk” by Sara Maria Glanowski and “Why Stop and Frisk Matters, Even if You Don’t Live in New York” by Andrew Cohen, the cons towards “Stop and Frisk” is clearly stated and relevant. People are being stopped based off racial profiling, while statistics proves that majority of the time, they are innocent. Stop and Frisk must be impermissible and abolished because it is unconstitutional and individuals are stopped based off appearance and not on evidence that proves there guilty.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and public order act 1998, states that police can stop and search someone for weapons, without suspicion that the person is involved in wrongdoing. However, an officer must have a reasonable belief that a crime had or is about to occur. A stop like this can only take place in a specific area for a short period of time.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Incarceration Theory

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many theories on why, how and even if race discrimination plays a significant role in explaining the current arrest and incarceration rates of minorities…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays