Preview

Stop N Frisks

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stop N Frisks
Laura Disla
English 201 Professor Langrone 04/03/12 Stop and Frisk
Stop and frisk is a program that the New York Police Department uses to stop and search anyone who looks suspicious. Police can stop and frisk anyone without a warrant. This topic is causing many controversies because of the excessive numbers of arrest. A disproportionate number of people of color especially African America and Hispanics are unreasonably stopped and searched simply for looking suspicious. They are the one that have been facing this situation more often. Minorities are having they higher percentage of stop and frisk than any other person. The police are violating the fourth amendment which states that any individual should have the right of protection from unreasonable search and seizure. The purpose of this program is to reduce crime and the use of weapon but if they are only searching one type of group that is not going to work. This program is becoming an excuse for police to take advantage of some innocent people. In the article, 'Stop and Frisks' Decrease In 2nd Quarter, the Police Say, talks about many people that are being stop and frisks and the tension that has caused to many residents in the city. According to Baker he states, “Officers stopped 113,945 people on city streets for the second quarter of the year; a number that a spokesman said was 12.4 percent lower than that recorded in the same period in 2006” (p.1). This is showing us that the numbers of people are now less than before. Police are now thinking more of the consequences of this issue and the tension that many people are having. Stopping someone just because they look “suspicious” is not enough reasons to humiliate them in front of others residents. Baker also illustrates, “Blacks made up 53 percent of those stopped, Hispanic made up 32 percent, Whites made up 12 percent and Asian made up 3 percent” (p.1). This quote explains that most of the residents that are being stopped are people of color.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Eugene Robinson’s essay “You Have the Right to Remain a Target of Racial Profiling,” Robinson argues that police officers still racially profile when pulling over people for traffic offenses. He uses a Federal Bureau of Justice Statistics report that states that white, African-American and Hispanic drivers are equally likely to be pulled over by the police in a traffic stop. He doesn’t believe this to be true and delves deeper into the findings. Robinson notes that African-Americans and Hispanics are much more likely to be searched and be the subject of “police use of force”. Black drivers were also twice as likely to be arrested as white drivers, and Hispanics were more likely to receive a ticket. Whites were more likely to receive written or verbal warnings that blacks or…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In April of 2007 an African American man studying to be a doctor, is stopped and frisked by three New York City Police Officers. The man, 33 year old David Floyd said he was not doing anything suspicious. This is the now famous case of Floyd v City of New York which challenged stop and frisks as discriminatory and unconstitutional. The judge ruled stop and frisk cases like Floyd vs New York are discriminatory and police tactics like this must be reformed. Because not only are people being treated unfairly, they become labeled as criminals and often go on to live up to that kind of expectation.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Stop, question, and frisk” is a controversial practice that was used by the New York City Police Department, where a police officer would stop any person acting suspicious, the police officer would question them and if they felt that it rose to the level of reasonable suspicion; they would frisk them for weapons and other contraband. In other states it is known as the Terry stop. Stop-and-frisk was a useful tactic for the NYPD because statistics show that violent crime dropped while this procedure was in place.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “stop and frisk” or “Terry frisk” law is one of the most controversial laws in America. The law came about via a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest. This only holds if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the suspect maybe presently armed and or dangerous. The coming about of this law all started with a concealed weapons arrest in Cleveland, Ohio in the early 1960’s.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary and Responce

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In my summary of Eugene Robinson’s article “You Have the Right to Remain a Target of Racial Profiling”, starts off with the message that statistics released were from a study done in 2005, by the Federal Bureau of Justice. In that study black drivers were less likely to be stopped by police than drivers belonging to other groups. Mr. Robinson goes on to say that even with blacks being less likely to be pulled over, they are nearly 3 times more likely to be searched over white drivers. He goes on to say that the disparities between the racial groups might not constitute proof of bias, but to him are compelling enough because whites are less likely to experience police use of force than other racial groups. He also says that nearly 75% of whites and Hispanics were willing to concede to the fact that they had been caught dead to rights for red light or stop sign infractions. But just under half of the African Americans in the same situation felt that they had committed no infractions. He goes on to say that 9 out of 10 white drivers detained for some sort of vehicle defect thought that it was legitimate, but only 6.7 out of 10 black drivers felt the same way.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling is the biggest complaint in the black community, and one of the primary reasons why African Americans are put behind bars at a very fast rate. There could be a young sophisticated black male walking down the street , and because of his height, skin color, attire, and hair he could be stopped and searched. Sometimes the police may mistakenly identify a person as someone else and charge the person , and the individual may spend years behind bars until found innocent. "Blacks in Cleveland received one and a half times (1.53) their proportional share of traffic tickets, while whites received slightly less than two-thirds (0.60) of their share, another minorities received eight per-cent more than their proportional share of tickets (1.08)" (Dunn 971) The quote is saying that African American are pulled over for tickets more than white people. This quote show that cops pull people because they see black skin. A lot of times when a person is found innocent the government do not give them anything to make up for the time that was lost, but instead they throw them back into the world with nothing but confusion.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In terms of motorists, in 2005 Black drivers were three times more likely to be stopped and searched by police than Whites, and were twice as likely than White drivers to be arrested during a traffic stop (“Reality of Racial Profiling”). These findings demonstrate that police are more likely to target people of color than Whites and case studies have shown that this practice is counterproductive and a misallocation of law enforcement resources. For example, in Arizona although Black motorists were more likely than Whites to be stopped and searched, Whites who were searched were more likely to be carrying contraband (“Reality of Racial Profiling”). The case study in Arizona exemplifies a problem in the criminal justice system that must be addressed. Minority motorists are more likely than White motorists to be stopped and harassed by police based off the inherent belief that people of a minority race, ethnicity, or religion are more likely to engage in criminal or unlawful activity than…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am aware that here in New York we are surrounded by all types of people and of all cultures and races but why if this is so and we have our Constitution as it is written do we have to deal with this Stop and Frisk situation. I believe this is an invasion of space and privacy and that this violates our rights as citizens of this country. The Stop and frisk program is being done by the New York Police Department. They are stopping thousands of people and are searching for contraband and weapons.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Summary

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One could also argue that the president of the U.S, Donald Trump, claimed that the use of stop and frisk reduced crime in NYC. However, what Johnson and Trump fail to realize is that the data they are referring to is all inaccurate because it was based on racial profiling. The use of stop and frisk proved that officers focus more on skin color rather than the behavior of an individual, proving that criminological data will mostly always be inaccurate. According to the accurate data presented by Christopher Mathias, nearly 80% of stops were blacks and Latinos and 13% of them were whites yet, “a weapon was found in only 1.8 percent of blacks and Latinos frisked, as compared to a weapon being found in 3.8 percent of whites frisked.” Over 70% of the stops were blacks and Latinos and still whites had a higher percentage of carrying a weapon, which is over 50% of the cause for…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “NYPD’s controversial Stop and Frisk policy ruled unconstitutional” by Kerry Wills, Robert Gearty, and Stephen Rex Brown; which was polished January 8th, 12013. A major part of “Stop and Frisk’ in New York City is, NYPD is that it’s unconstitutional. The community feels that people feel that there is racial issue towards stopping and frisking. Manhattan Federal Court Judge Shira Scheindlin ordered police to reduce the amounts of trespass and abusing their power to frisk everyone. Juan Gonzalez feels that, “Too many innocents harassed by NYPD’s “Stop and Frisk” policy.” The police department were practicing, Stop and Frisking in front of a private residential building. The police Commissioner Raymond Kelly totally agreed with the police officers practicing to stop and frisk. Raymond Kelly states, “Some take for granted the safety provided by doormen....” Part of the community disagrees and agrees with them practicing stop and frisk and most people feel like it seem to be racial profiling.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First let’s ask what does Stop and frisk actually mean legally? “It’s the situation in which a police officer who is suspicious of an individual detains the person and runs his hands lightly over the suspect's outer garments to determine if the person is carrying a concealed weapon.”…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop Frisk

    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the city where crime was at all time high during the nineties, the top politicians in New York City decided that something should be done to help stop crime. The NYPD implemented the “Stop and Frisk” policy to bring the crime rate down in the city. However it did more than exceed its expectations and it has been more of a negative than a positive. This policy created tension between the NYPD and the law abiding citizens of New York City because thousands stopped were people of the Black and Latino communities. According to the US Census Bureau NYC has a population of 8,336,697 people. Blacks and Latinos make up 53% of the city population. 85% of New Yorkers stopped are Black and Latino men and 6% of that number actually led to an arrest (NYCLU). At this shocking percentage, it’s apparent that this policy is discriminatory against Blacks and Latinos. Not only is this policy discriminatory, it has violated citizens constitutional rights and been deemed racial profiling.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In America there have been multiple tyrannical actions that the government have used on citizens and innocent bystanders. One of these actions are called “Stop and Frisk” which is a prevalent tactic used, especially in New York. “Stop and Frisk” means to be randomly searched by police or high authority when they suspect a bystander is carrying something suspicious. “Stop and Frisk” is a political issue that has been a concern for a long period of time. According to the articles “Growing up with Stop and Frisk” by Sara Maria Glanowski and “Why Stop and Frisk Matters, Even if You Don’t Live in New York” by Andrew Cohen, the cons towards “Stop and Frisk” is clearly stated and relevant. People are being stopped based off racial profiling, while statistics proves that majority of the time, they are innocent. Stop and Frisk must be impermissible and abolished because it is unconstitutional and individuals are stopped based off appearance and not on evidence that proves there guilty.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It doesn’t help that the media is displaying cops harassing people and causing people to die because of trying to hard to stop & frisk them. There needs to be a healthy balance and train the officers to better handle certain stop & frisk situations. Furthermore, the community needs to be a bit more understand and it is hard because of awful the media portrays this procedure, but they need to do some research and put themselves in the cops’ shoes to see how they would handle…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays