Preview

Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm of Strategy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
844 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm of Strategy
Structure-Conduct-Performance
Definition:
The Structure-Conduct-Performance (S-C-P) paradigm of strategy assumes market structure would determine firm conduct which would determine performance.
Structure: The term structure in this model refers to industry structure, measured by such factors as the number of competitors in an industry, the heterogeneity of products, and the cost of entry and exit.
Conduct: Conduct refers to specific firm actions in an industry, including price taking, product differentiation, tacit collusion, and exploitation of market power
Performance: Performance in the S-C-P model has two meanings: the performance of individual firms and the performance of the economy as a whole. According to the structure-conduct-performance paradigm, the market environment have a direct, short term impact on the market structure. The market structure then has a direct influence on the firm's economic conduct which in turn affects its market performance. Therein, feedback effects occur such that market performance may impact conduct and structure or conduct may affect on the market structure.

Extra note on S-C-P model
The Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) paradigm is considered to be an important tool of contemporary industrial economics. It states that market performance depends on various elements of market structure, such as entry conditions, market concentration, and number and size of firms, as well as different forms of firm conduct and strategic behavior, such as capacity utilization, advertising and collusion. This study elucidates the basic ideas of SCP theory and reviews important studies pertaining to both developed and developing economies that are based on the SCP paradigm, while exploring the relevance of the SCP paradigm to the Indian industry. The relationship between market concentration and market performance in the Indian industry is discussed in depth, as is the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bis 320 Week 3 Assignment

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A firm can fall under several market structures. The market structure of a firm also can change based on a number of items such as technology, mergers, product or service offering, etc. The simulation of East West brought to light the various market structures and the advantages and disadvantages of each.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess how, market structure positively and negatively affects the firm, evaluate the structures competitive strategies.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Market structure is firms or companies that produced identical product which are uniform. There are different types of market structures which includes perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly and monopoly each of these structure function a certain way. Some of the key factors of market structure are size of firms, entry condition, role of government, price change and differentiation. Some of these elements can be a determinant factor and very influential on the market system.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are different classifications of markets and the structure of a business determines which classification it will fall into. Markets are divided according to the composition of the business and what it provides to the specific market. Business composition is determined by the structure of market characteristics, and this helps determine level and area of competition. The characteristics in a market with the most concentration focus on number of purchasers and retailers, level in which a product has a substitute, price, entry and exit ease, and the level of mutual dependence. These structured variables are classified in the following market structures: perfectly competitive markets, monopolistically competitive markets, monopolies, and oligopolies (Colander, 2010).…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    › ‘Structure’ – multiple meanings › This is ‘part of’ understanding Business Structure › Organisational Structure will help us understand: ‘What is a Business’?…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillies Case Study 2

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The market structure is the dynamic system in which all businesses competes. The state of the system limits the flexibility of the business. For businesses to understand effectively the nature of the competition they face, they must define their market accurately as well as recognize a broad base of competitors and create strategies that differentiate it from its rivals. A baseball franchise is more than just a team, it’s a business operating in an extremely competitive market, especially if the team isn’t a winning one.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Market structure refers to the important features that determine the level of competition in an industry. These factors include (a) the number of buyers and sellers, (b) the products degree of uniformity, (c) the ease with which new firms enter or old firms exit the market, and (d) the ways in which firms in the industry compete with each othersuch as through prices or advertising.…

    • 2887 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Strategy is fundamental in an organization's overall performance. The strategy selected depends upon numerous factors. The environment has a direct influence on the relationship between strategy and performance. The combination of several factors contributes to the strategies chosen and influence the performance of an organization. The current dynamic and competitive business environment influences companies to survive, grow and be profitable as an essential goal for all industries. Organizations are challenged by identifying the benefits and limitations of Porter's Five Forces and Kaplan's and Norton's Balanced Scorecard. These powerful strategic management tools can be linked to interact with each other. Porter's work can facilitate managers formulate their strategy making decisions on the basis of organizational external environment. Kaplan's and Norton's work makes sure the strategy formulated incorporates specific objectives to ensure and monitor the strategy is executed by managers within well structured measures.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conduct refers to the behavior (or strategy) of firms under a given set of circumstances, normally determined by the structural characteristics of industry. The structural characteristics outlined earlier determine firm objectives, which in turn feed through to firms’ price and non-price decisions.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strategy or Structure

    • 3398 Words
    • 14 Pages

    To establish direction, a strategy must be explained to others. Strategy determines what the key activities and factors are in a business. That is, in addition to establishing a course for the future, one must get others on board for the ride. Most people find that there is a clear definition of the mission or purpose makes possible clear and realistic business objectives and goals. It is the foundation for priorities, strategies, plans and work assignments so in a sense structure follows strategy. And strategy requires knowing what our business is and what it should be. What if your organization is working with a legacy structure? If you want to accomplish your mission you 'll need to start there, formulate strategy to do what needs to be done…and then align structures to make the strategy happen.…

    • 3398 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Market Structure

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We can classify firms by the roles they play in the target market: leader, challenger, follower, or nicher. Suppose a market is occupied by the firms shown in Figure 1.1. Forty percent of the market is in the hands of a market leader; another 30 percent is in the hands of a market challenger; another 20 percent is in the hands of a market follower, a firm that is willing to maintain its market share and not rock the boat. The remaining 10 percent is in the hands of market nichers, firms that serve small market segments not being served by larger firms.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    apple inc

    • 3566 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Organizational structure is the framework companies use to outline their authority and communication processesSeveral factors affect the organizational structure of a company. These factors can be internal or external.…

    • 3566 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problems that Schering-Plough experienced with it global strategy and structure is that it took a multidomestic strategy that was over decentralized to the point that each of the heads of a international region had assumed total control of their operations (Jones, 2013, p.237). This left management at all levels within the corporate headquarters uniformed about the performance of each region. Leaving the corporation with major drug quality issues on their hands that the Food and Drug Administration was demanding that it overhaul is operations to increase and protect drug quality (Jones, 2013, p.237). Schering-Plough failed to manage how to disperse and designate obligation and power between supervisors at home and abroad so compelling control over an organization's worldwide operations were maintained. The culture issues had risen at different location outside the United States. In one case European managers who ran their own marketing and research operations ignored a promising antibiotic known as Zyvox simply because it had been developed in Kalamazoo, Michigan and not in their country (Simmons, 2003, para. 10). Corporate Headquarters allowed for the culture and shared values that control behavior to be developed by regional management with no institutional insight. These cultures become ingrained inside the employee behaviors allowing the organization to lose its competitive edge.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership and Strategy

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clegg mentions the difference between the two distinct behaviors for transformational and transactional in leadership. Transformational leadership is charismatic, inspirational, intellectually stimulating and individually considerate (pg. 223). Transactional leadership, on the other hand, motives individuals through “contingent-reward exchanges” and active management-by-exception (pg. 223).…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The SCP paradigm assumes that the market structure determines the conduct of the organization. This conduct, in turn, is the determinant of market performance. Examples of market performance include efficiency, profitability and growth. The framework seeks to establish that certain structures of the industry can lead to certain kinds of conduct or behaviour which then leads to various types of economic performance. The SCP paradigm was developed through evaluation of empirical studies involving American industries. Theoretical models were not used to support the paradigm. The conclusion that was drawn from empirical studies was that market structure determined performance. This is caused by the belief that the laws of competition should not be based on behavioural models but rather on structural remedies. According to J.S. Bain who developed the paradigm in the 1950s, most industries became concentrated than necessary (Ferguson & Ferguson, 1994). In concentrated industries, there are high barriers to entry. New firms cannot enter these markets that easily.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays