Preview

Styles of Historiography: Herodotus vs Einhard

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
940 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Styles of Historiography: Herodotus vs Einhard
The Styles of Historiography: Herodotus vs. Einhard

Herodotus and Einhard write history in two completely different styles. Einhard’s style is about giving specific details, while Herodotus’s style is about giving his own personal opinions and information that he has from secondary sources. The biggest effect of the difference amongst the two historian’s style of writing is the fact that Einhard’s history of Charlemagne’s life gives information that makes it seem as if the events were realistic, while some of the events that Herodotus talks about seem conjured. The Two Lives of Charlemagne gives details about the life of Charlemagne. The entire story praises Charlemagne as a great hero and leader. All the qualities of the emperor seem perfect, like the fact that he is fair to not only his sons but also his daughters,[1] or that he gives alms to all Christians from different areas of the world.[2] The ever so perfect qualities of Charlemagne make it seem as if Einhard’s interpretations are a bit embellished because it brings up the question that how can anyone be so ideal? It is through some of his bad qualities that help show that Einhard’s style of historical writing is believable. One of Charlemagne’s bad qualities is shown when Einhard mentions the dangerous conspiracies against Charlemagne. He mentions that due to a conspiracy against Charlemagne, “all the plotters were exiled, some having their eyes put out first.”[3] This shows that Einhard does depict some of Charlemagne’s flaws rather than just acknowledging his greatness. Einhard also makes it seem as if Charlemagne is good at doing everything. He is said to be a great horseback rider and an excellent swimmer[4], however he is not able to learn to write.[5] Though Charlemagne has these flaws, Einhard covers them up through excuses. In the case of having the plotters exiled Einhard states, “the cruelty of Queen Fastrada is thought to have been the cause of both these



Cited: 1. Einhard, “The Life of Charlemagne,” in Lewis Thorpe, trans., Two Lives of Charlemagne (London: Penguin, 1969). 2. Herodotus, “The Histories Book 2,” in Aubrey de Selincourt, trans., Herodotus The Histories (London: Penguin, 1954). ----------------------- [1] Einhard, “The Life of Charlemagne,” in Lewis Thorpe, trans., Two Lives of Charlemagne (London: Penguin, 1969), 74. [8] Herodotus, “The Histories Book 2,” in Aubrey de Selincourt, trans., Herodotus The Histories (London: Penguin, 1954), 129.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pacific Empire Dbq

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The emperors, Henry VII and Ludwig IV, had both dreamed of bringing about a renewal of imperial authority and the empire, in the mould of the Carolingians, or perhaps even, Rome itself, and it seemed at the beginning of the fourteenth-century that this might be plausible. Yet, this had not been the only envisioned ‘empire’ at the start of the fourteenth-century; there was the imagined papal monarchy, reigning supreme over all of Italy, or perhaps even all Christendom, the Plantagenet Empire dreamed of by King Edward I of England, or the Capetian Empire of King Philip IV of France, or even King Alfonso XI of Castile’s united Iberian Peninsula. These “fantasy kingdoms”, to borrow a phrase from John Watts, would prove to be unachievable, but as…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Notker wrote much later on the life of Charlemagne, his writing concluded that his view of Charlemagne; was quite similar to the positive portrayal of a pious and almost “monkish” king espoused by both Thegan and the Astronomer about Louis. Notker claims that Charlemagne is a God-willed priest in several places as well as stating that control and protection of the Church were fundamental royal duties. Since Notker was writing later in history than either Thegan or the Astronomer, it is possible that he, likewise, employed their practice of calling a king “priestly or monkish.”…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Einhard’s biography of Charlemagne, he praises his dedication towards the empire he has created, and family in order for many generations could remember Charlemagne’s influence on society and his rule. In his work, from The Life of Charlemagne, he illustrates the king’s life of physical and mental prowess, the education and well-being of his children, and the building and preservation of his Christian Roman Empire. Einhard portrays Charlemagne as extremely prosperous and intelligent in governing such a…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alcuin and Charlemagne

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charlemagne was the king of the Franks from 768 to 814. He was known to be the most powerful Christian ruler and brought success to his country. Charlemagne was well educated and good looking. His strong voice allowed him to express what he had to say in a very eloquent manner. He was most famous for doubling the territory that his father had previously conquered. With his determination and persistence, Charlemagne became one of the most dignified rulers of the early middle ages.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Charlemagne

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Becoming Charlemagne, written by Jeff Speck. This book written by Jeff Speck, chronicles events around the life of a Germanic king name Karl. Becoming Charlemagne is a factual account of the events that took place in the empires of A.D 800. Jeff Sypeck explains key events in this time period and illustrates how the king Karl became the legend Charlemagne.…

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written “under the patronage of Charlemagne’s heir,” Einhard certainly sought not only to magnify the image of Charlemagne but also to preserve the Carolingian line through Louis the Pious. He illustrates this twofold purpose in his acknowledgement of Louis the Pious as heir in a narrative that specifically concerns the life of Charlemagne: “He established Louis as the co-ruler of the entire kingdom and the heir to the imperial title.” At the same time, however, Einhard fails to mention the once proposed division of the empire upon the death of Charlemagne. Even though Louis the Pious’s brothers had died earlier and so the division of the kingdom is no longer practical, the failure to mention the intended plan delineates the correspondence of the narrative with regard to actual historical truth. As in Charlemagne’s will, Einhard in his writing “enhanced his [Louis’s] powerful reputation and filled foreign peoples with great fear.” In this respect, Einhard creates a continuity within the Carolingian line. In glorifying the life of Charlemagne, he celebrates his heir. Thus, it becomes clear that Einhard, aware of the political implications, wrote the biography for posterity and with political…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    nd battered from war to hold a pen.” Though he never quite got the hang of writing, Charlemagne expressed interest and had a talent for languages. His interest and enthusiasm for learning would later promote of literacy in others. Seeing a need for change and valuing intellectual activities, Charlemagne ascended the throne and ushered an educational revolution and started an educational reform that influenced Europe. Charlemagne was portrayed as a comprehensively educated sovereign, of all the Roman emperors before his time.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne was born into a royal family which means he was destined to become royalty later on. He was born around 742 and was the son of Bertrada of Laon and Pepin the Short who became king in 751. Pepin divided the kingdom equally between him and his brother. After his brother died and it was passed on to his nephews, Charlemagne murdered them and seized their territories. As an adult, Charlemagne displayed a talent for languages and could speak Latin and understand Greek, among other languages.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The song of Roland"

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne- the Christian, Frank king who is notably an ally to the Pope and great Conqueror. He was also known as Charles the Great.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking back at history, an individual usually can find an incredible amount of information about any given period in any given part of the world. Yet as varied are the history books, so are the biases which they each present. We see one example of these biases in Einhard's The Life of Charlemagne in which this adviser and close friend to the great Frankish king gives his history of Charlemagne's life. One issue that Einhard repeatedly touches on is the virtually uninterrupted series of wars that the Frankish Kingdom under 'Charles the Great' undertook. Throughout the individual accounts of these war, Einhard attempts to justify Charlemagne's military career.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charlemagne's reign was consumed with wars in which he was successful. He never had to confront a first-class enemy in battle. Charlemagne inherited a well-trained Frankish Kingdom from his martial father and grandfather. His wars, however, were of high importance for history; especially the conquest of the Saxons and the Lombards which implied the bringing of much of Germany and Italy into the circle of "The Holy Roman Empire," and of medieval civilization. Through a careful reading of Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne and Einhard’s The War of Charlemagne, I will demonstrate that Charlemagne was a great, powerful, and strategic military…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though he had very little information about Herodotus’ life, Martin expresses in his introduction that in the beginning of Herodotus life, he was forced to escape from his homeland into exile as a refugee. Two wars marked the beginning of his life and the end of his life; The Persian Wars and the Peloponnesian war. Herodotus spent most of his life traveling. Herodotus also had a famous work called The Histories.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In glorifying Charlemagne, Einhard prescribed the qualities of a good and effective king. In each war, Charlemagne made an effort to fight with his troops, and unlike his father, had the gall to wage a long battle and pursue an enemy even after their surrender. For this he became very successful in every campaign. Einhard said his "mettlesome spirit and his imperturbility . . . remained as constant in adversity as in prosperity" (Thorpe, 62). He never let offenders go unpunished. Never withdrawing from an enterprise he had begun, Einhard said his skill and endurance made him "the most able and noble-spirited . . . [ruler] . . . in his time" (63). Charlemagne sent messengers to almost any enemy, offering them a peaceful surrender before he attacked. The surrender of Duke Tassilo of Bavaria, for example, happened before anyone made it to the battlefield. Many times this tactic worked, and his army and his enemies respected him more for it. Einhard mentioned how many of Charlemagne 's campaigns and conquests were bloodless because of his pre-war actions. In his lifetime, Charlemagne annexed Aquitaine, Gascony, the Pyrenees, Italy, Saxony, most of the provinces of Pannonia and Dacia, and tamed many of the barbarous nations in Germany (69).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne was a king who believed different. He wanted to learn how to read and write. Kings at this time weren’t known to be book smart or to take the time to actually learn something new educational wise. However, monks were the only ones who had reason to do. Charlemagne broke that stereotype and had someone to teach him who to do these things. He was also a hypocrytical man. He killed people who went against the teaching of the bible yet he also disobeyed it. The bible says that a person is only supposed to have only one wife/husband for as long as they both shall live. Now, Charlemagne was very passionate about women. He had a total of five wives and five mistresses all of this totaled up to at least twenty children. He had a great…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne, born in 742, ruled the Franks for forty six years, from 768 to 814. He was born around 742 and was emperor for 14 years, from 800-814, or until he died. His mother’s name was Bertrada and his father was King Pepin the third, King of the Franks from 751 to 768 AD. He had four wives in his entire life, the daughter of Desiderius, Hildegard, Fastrada, and Luitgard. His children were Charles, Pepin, Louis, and more. Louis went on the be king after Charlemagne. He also shared the Frankish Kingdom with his brother, Carloman, for about three years until Carloman died in 771. After his death,…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays