There were several breakdowns in Target’s security operations. First, the security system was not compliant to the latest standards nor was the architecture robust enough – too many systems were chained together without defenses between them. Second, Target did not make the changes that were suggested to them on multiple fronts, but instead either ignored them completely or did not implement a plan that would last long. Third, the response to the multiple warnings, from both the monitoring system and the security teams, was not enough in comparison to the severity of the warnings. Like most organizations, Target could not predict the kind of attack that would be executed on them; however, had they responded to any of these problems directly and more carefully, they could have stopped the breach much sooner.3. The first thing I would recommend to the company would be to at least implement the standards and known issues. Yes, the main point of APTs are to constantly attack, adapt, and repeat until breach, but having established protocols in place would help Target to be less vulnerable by default. Second, I would make sure that there are establish security “check points” at all levels of system interaction or transactions. The check points should be robust enough to stop anything that is not explicitly correct. And lastly, I think Target should I would make sure that there is a proper response workflow for every point of the APT kill chain...this way, although the APT
There were several breakdowns in Target’s security operations. First, the security system was not compliant to the latest standards nor was the architecture robust enough – too many systems were chained together without defenses between them. Second, Target did not make the changes that were suggested to them on multiple fronts, but instead either ignored them completely or did not implement a plan that would last long. Third, the response to the multiple warnings, from both the monitoring system and the security teams, was not enough in comparison to the severity of the warnings. Like most organizations, Target could not predict the kind of attack that would be executed on them; however, had they responded to any of these problems directly and more carefully, they could have stopped the breach much sooner.3. The first thing I would recommend to the company would be to at least implement the standards and known issues. Yes, the main point of APTs are to constantly attack, adapt, and repeat until breach, but having established protocols in place would help Target to be less vulnerable by default. Second, I would make sure that there are establish security “check points” at all levels of system interaction or transactions. The check points should be robust enough to stop anything that is not explicitly correct. And lastly, I think Target should I would make sure that there is a proper response workflow for every point of the APT kill chain...this way, although the APT