Summary Of Ageism

In the article “Ageism and Future Cohorts of Elderly: Implications for Social Work,” author, Anna Azulai outlines ageism as an emerging concept with many facets. Due to its multidimensionality, ageism is difficult to clearly identify and study. Azulai explains ageism as a phenomenon resulting in discrimination and social exclusion based on a group of people and their particular age. Due to its complex nature, ageism has been minimally studied compared to racism and sexism. As “baby boomers” reach retirement, it is critical for helping professions to better work alongside this group of people. Unfortunately, oppression is experienced with aging people leading them to live unhealthy lives. Furthermore, the article reinforces the negative associations
The article explains there is a growing population reaching retirement who face discrimination and social exclusion, which negatively impacts the well-being of people. It is concerning because attitudes and behaviors can contribute to the living conditions of people. Furthermore, the lack of knowledge regarding ageism adds to the concern of older people and their well-being as we move forward. The article explains there is evidence that ageism transcends culture. In a society where media and television continues to influence the way we perceive ideas, we are constantly exposed to beliefs through subtle and manipulative ways. Nelson (2011) suggests the printing press and industrial revolution as historical developments resulting in ageism. This notion would suggest a younger workforce and less emotional support. In my opinion, certain cultural groups, such as Indigenous Elders are seen as heavily relied upon for wisdom and guidance. Furthermore, historical developments suggested by Nelson may not be inclusive of all cultural
This suggests further questions need to be answered in regards to ageism and how it affects people. In addition, the word “phenomenon” is used throughout the article as a way to indicate the rise of ageism. A limited number of research studies can be misleading, thereby portraying the notion ageism is a bigger problem than it really is. Azulai outlines studies on intersectionality of ageism, which seems to be a reoccurring theme within oppression. For example, racism and social inequality can be seen as co-existing. Furthermore, it is safe to express the reconciliation act as an evident example. Age-gendered correlation of ageism is also explained; women masking their chronological age through use of beauty work suggests stigma and fear that are associated with older people. As mentioned in the article, ageist beliefs are based on ability, looks, and contribution. Therefore, women masking their age can be a result of dodging stereotypes and labelling; ultimately, this suggests avoidance. Research protocols in a particular study reported age restriction as inappropriate and unnecessary; this can be explained by parallel beliefs between institutionalization and society. Through qualitative research within assisted living settings, researchers found evidence of stigma and ageism as a result of living conditions and environment settings. Although, researchers suggested the living environment could