Summary Of Alejandro De La Fuente
Alejandro de la Fuente is writing an argument on slavery with different point of view, narrating a debate based on the Law in Latin America. The different prespectives are from Tannenbaum who is well known as a big influence during slavery, Christopher Schmidt-Nowara and Maria Elena Diaz. The author started with a confession about what he thinks of the work that this people have done and explaining their position and point of view. Slave opportunites such as slave codes, immigration and education, were part of this debate. To fiish the main claim of his article, the author gave an example of how slaves who claim their priorities gain a little of victory making an impact in the administration of justice, in this case, the local justice. Even
though they were punished, better food was proived as they apealed as one of the complains. This particular article help me to have a better idea of how to write my own argument, how to write experiences, evindence, points of view and the main purpose of my argument.
De la Fuente received his law degree from the University of Havana in 1985, he had an interest of writing about the issues of race and slavery. He became a Research Professor. He is the Senior Editor of the journal Cuban Studies.
though they were punished, better food was proived as they apealed as one of the complains. This particular article help me to have a better idea of how to write my own argument, how to write experiences, evindence, points of view and the main purpose of my argument.
De la Fuente received his law degree from the University of Havana in 1985, he had an interest of writing about the issues of race and slavery. He became a Research Professor. He is the Senior Editor of the journal Cuban Studies.