One should gain knowledge and insight from extensive instruction accomplished through reading through great works of the past and analyzing their rhetorical techniques, or through following the teachings of masters of the subject. The author of this piece, for an example, went to great lengths to be wellversed in historical literature reading and analyzing works of art such as Niccolo Machiavelli's "The Qualities of the Prince" and Henry David Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience". Through these readings, she learned about various rhetorical techniques such as parallelism, persuasiveness, comparison, and compartmentalized reasoning. She also placed herself under the instruction of the highlyesteemed Dr. Boggs, who guided …show more content…
This has threefold benefits: improving their work, helping to improve other’s work, and becoming a critical thinker. This author speaks from experience. Her own work was greatly improved because her peers occasionally found mistakes and errors that she otherwise would never have caught. Whenever she came together with a group of authors, preferably those also wellversed in classic literature and those also under the tutelage of great masters of writing, she found that her writing was criticized in the best way possible. Her peers provided her with both positive and negative feedback, and best of all, they not only criticized, but suggested ways she could improve! The author could also be a tremendous help to her league of writers by offering her input when they desired help on their essays. Finding flaws in logic, watching for senseless arguments, and determining solutions for those mistakes ultimately helped her to become a better critical thinker and became a key concept in turning her into an excellent