Preview

Summary Of Dividing Power: The American System Of Government

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Dividing Power: The American System Of Government
Chapter 4
We – the People

Dividing Power: The American System of Government
The Basics
• Americans have distrusted any concentration of political power ever since its founding
• American form of government was written down in a Constitution o 1787, after thirteen colonies gained independence from Great Britain
• “Tyranny” of King George III – the Americans wanted to make sure no person was allowed to have too much power
• Representative democracy o Elected representatives who could be regularly shifted out o Power rested with the people
• Federal system o Individual states which give only certain specific powers to a central government o Federalism
• The separation of powers o Divided the power into three o No one is too powerful
…show more content…

“The winner takes it all”. The other votes are “wasted”.

85306

• If A and B goes together and supports one candidate, that candidate could easily win with 60% of the votes
• Problems: finding someone they both support
• The US only has two parties: The Democrats and the Republicans. Both are giant coalitions of wildly different political groups.

Shooting for the center
• Both parties are coalitions → neither party presents a very clear political profile
• A clear ideology would send away some interest groups, weakening the party
• Both parties are vague about what they stand for
• No one wants to come out with strong ideological statements that might scare away any voters, because to win you have to win the votes of the electorate, which basically is divided into two

The Democratic Party (donkey)
• Supports stronger federal authority, more liberal, willing to use government in the service of the people at the expense of “states’


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States has only two major political parties: the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties have a duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country. In the United States, a candidate wins the election by gaining a plurality, or more votes than any other candidate. This is a winner-take-all system because there is no reward for the party or candidate that finishes second. Parties aim to be as large as possible, smoothing over differences among candidates and voters. There is no incentive to form a party that consistently gets votes but cannot win an election. As a result, two political parties usually dominate plurality electoral systems to the disadvantage of smaller third parties, just as the Democrats and the Republicans dominate the American political system. No one person or organization prevents third parties from forming, but the plurality system itself usually hinders their efforts to win votes. The United States also has mostly single-member districts, meaning that each legislative district sends only one member to the legislature. There is no benefit to finishing second. Some countries use multiple-member districts, which makes it easier for minor parties to succeed because there are more members winning seats in the legislature. Also the way the US electoral college system is set up discourages third-party candidates. The Electoral College exacerbates the winner-take-all system…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many reasons why America has only two major political parties. It could be the cause of the federal government. The major parties reflect its decentralized structure. Candidates are recruited at the state or local level and are responsive primarily to their own state or local constituencies. At the national level, they consist of local party representatives. This state local orientation affects the policy positions that parties take and the decisions that their elected officials make. What this really means is that we started off with a two party government and people in these parties came into power. Now that they attained the power they do not want to give it away so what the parties do is give their power to people that think just like them which would be other members in their party. On top of that it is so hard for a smaller party with no financial backing to even compete with the two monstrous parties.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King George III ruled Great Britain during the years of the American Revolutionary War. American colonists were unsatisfied with his rule. As indicated by Bob Ruppert, between 1774 and 1776, he passed out many acts that people detested. Passage of the Coercive Acts, the Quebec Act, the New England Restraining Act, and the Prohibitory Act. King George lost all of the people's trust and faith. "A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may be define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people", Thomas Jefferson stated, saying that the king is a tyrant who violates people's natural rights and should not have power upon free people thus convincing them to support independence.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The US has a two party system, like the UK. One of the main reasons for this is because they both have a First-past-the-post voting system which is unlikely to change. Using this system, it enables two strong parties to be always competing with each other which can be argued as a good thing although it is also argued that it is unfair as it doesn’t give other parties an equal opportunity. A reason why these two parties are so dominant could be because they have ‘catch all’ policies so they attract a wider audience whereas third parties tend to have policies on specific issues such as the Green party which focus’ on environmental issues. One of…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America has succeeded in forming a country based on previous ruling, Monarchy. The founding fathers worked hard in making sure that everyone had a say in our government. America was designed with equal ruling powers, or separation of powers unlike a monarchy, where only one is making the decisions for all subjects of the kingdom. In addition, the separation of powers allows for equal power to be dispersed between the three branches of government. America was established by the founding fathers to create a government with equally divided powers.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    11. A plurality is more than half the votes cast. (false) -the state of being plural or numerous…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early years of the United States, the men who began our government had many issues to resolve. The Separation of Powers in the American democracy is where the early government decided to separate the branches of government into three separate areas. The separation was enacted due to keeping the government from having one person in total control and having a tyrannical form of government instead of a democratic form for the people. The writers of the Constitution; or Framers, were the earliest form of government and thought by following the rules and agendas that they had been following for more than 100 years, that the government would be better…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government in America

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ch 9 Study Guide 1. The three elements needed for success in the nomination game. a. b. c.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze how the U.S. Constitution implements separation of powers and checks and balances. Briefly explain why the constitutional framers based the new government on these ideas. Evaluate how separation of powers and checks and balances are working out in practice, today, justifying your assessments with persuasive reasoning and examples.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having a government that contains energy, stability and republican liberty might not seem that hard if one of these three ingredients are present, but if two or more are present in government it is where the difficulty begins. It is hard to fit all these three characteristics into one government because they do not blend together. Publius describes the need for energy and stability in the new government while at the same time maintaining the republican liberty. The 1787 Constitution achieves these through a separation of powers between the three branches of the federal government.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution does not contain a provision explicitly declaring that the powers of the three branches of the federal government be separated. Yet, separation of powers serves various goals. Separation prevents concentration of power and provides each branch with the arson to fight off encroachment by the other two branches. The system of separated powers is designed to maximize freedom.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers is the process of the United States government in which powers and responsibilities are divided among the federal and state governments. Powers not given to the federal government in the Constitution are given to the states. The federal government is made up of three branches: Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the thirteen colonies were already free and sovereign states, they were not a united nation. These colonies had been governed since 1781 by the Articles of Confederation, a constitution that established a weak central government. According to the Articles of Confederation, Congress, which was composed of representatives of the people, could not enact laws or raise taxes. Moreover, there was no federal judiciary or permanent executive power. Each state was almost independent, meaning that it could even establish its own fiscal barriers.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At one point it was expected, that the Congress would pass laws, the President would execute them, and the Supreme Court would interpret them in individual cases. This was the framework for the Separation of Powers; established by the Constitution, and stuck to it for the greater part of our history. The Founding Fathers were well-acquainted with a long-held tenet of government: the accumulation of power by a single person or body of government is the greatest threat to liberty. In fact, a celebrated feature of the…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays