city matters and why city should heavily consider love while thinking about their community. In chapter two of "For the Love of Cities", Kageyama discusses how the use of a city pyramid can be beneficial to a city in their decision making. He explains that a city's "hierarchy of needs" is utilized to make their communities functional and safe. The hierarchy of needs is a pyramid that consists of 5 sections. The very top of the pyramid is titled, 'interesting', the second is 'convivial', the third is 'comfortable', the fourth is 'safe' and the last one is 'functional'. Each of these levels are what city officials would want a city to be made up of. City officials simply want their city to be place where their citizens feel safe and to feel as though their city is functional. Kageyama doesn't find a problem with city governments trying to make their cities safe and functional but rather when the government solely focuses on these qualities in their city- they lose the opportunity to do even better work. He argues that a city should be able to be safe, comfortable and functional. They should also be able strive to be interesting and fun by creating a convivial atmosphere.
city matters and why city should heavily consider love while thinking about their community. In chapter two of "For the Love of Cities", Kageyama discusses how the use of a city pyramid can be beneficial to a city in their decision making. He explains that a city's "hierarchy of needs" is utilized to make their communities functional and safe. The hierarchy of needs is a pyramid that consists of 5 sections. The very top of the pyramid is titled, 'interesting', the second is 'convivial', the third is 'comfortable', the fourth is 'safe' and the last one is 'functional'. Each of these levels are what city officials would want a city to be made up of. City officials simply want their city to be place where their citizens feel safe and to feel as though their city is functional. Kageyama doesn't find a problem with city governments trying to make their cities safe and functional but rather when the government solely focuses on these qualities in their city- they lose the opportunity to do even better work. He argues that a city should be able to be safe, comfortable and functional. They should also be able strive to be interesting and fun by creating a convivial atmosphere.