Summary Of Ian Brown's Internalized Oppression

Ian Brown compels readers with his memoir of the challenges and rewards that come with raising a child with (dis)abilities. Brown provides evidence into the ramifications of ableism and the negative socio-cultural construction of (dis) ability, on top of, the inadequate support available. The compounding oppressions after exposure for an extended period create damaging psychological effects (Mullaly, 2007). Many of the economic, political, and social barriers the Brown’s encounter are due to ableism and an oppressive society (Carniol, 2010). This has led to normal but destructive and ineffective coping mechanisms, such as guilt expiration rituals and social withdrawal. I had several reactions to this book, ranging from sympathy to anger, at the several types of oppression they experience and anger in how Ian portrays his son, as a curse bestowed upon his family (Michalko & Titchkosky, 2009). Following a brief introduction to the Brown’s family, this paper will analyze this family’s internalized oppression, how this progressed, on top of, the consequences this poses for practitioners and preferred interventions who wish to begin breaking down these barriers.
The family experiences social isolation, rejection, and conflicts in their family, creating an “unusual loneliness.” (p.68), and leading to damaging psychological effects. Caring for Walker has impacted their marriage and home life “my wife and I fought a lot” (p.65). With no support, how could this not affect their marriage? They cannot socialize, and when they do, they are rarely invited back as guests. Friends try to help but despite Johanna’s protests, Ian refuses as Walker would be too much. Had this family had the at-home support they deserve, their social life would have increased, decreasing the damaging effects of long-time exposure to social