Preview

Summary Of Jean Hatter's Complaint Against The Defendant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Jean Hatter's Complaint Against The Defendant
The plaintiff, Jean Hatter, by and through her attorney, Nancy McGee, for her Complaint against the Defendant alleges the following:

1. Plaintiff is a citizen of North Carolina, residing at 123 Shirtsleeve Drive, Durham, North Carolina, 27517. The action occurred in the state of North Carolina, county of Durham.

2. Defendant is incorporated to do business in the state of North Carolina, with the principal location of business being 456 Food Shop Road, Durham, North Carolina, 27517, and the defendant’s registered agent is Marco Lario, who can be served at that address.

3. On April, 9, 2017 the plaintiff was shopping for food at the defendant’s store when the automated conveyer belt caught her sleeve causing her to suffer the injuries and damages listed
…show more content…
Plaintiff’s injuries included a dislocated shoulder, loss of consciousness, and a laceration on her head.

5. Due to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff at the defendant’s store the plaintiff has been unable to work and has incurred expensive medical bills ($25,000).

6. Plaintiff has suffered prolonged damage due to the unlikelihood of her complete recovery and inability to return to work coupled with emotional damages from the action.

WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant in an amount to be proven at trial, including medical bills, lost wages, costs of damaged clothing, pain and suffering, costs expended in filing this suit, interest from the date of the commencement of this action, expert witness fees, attorney’s fees, and for any other and further relief that this Court may seem proper and just.

THE PLAINTIFF DEMANDS THAT THIS ACTION BE TRIED TO A JURY.

The defendant, Foods Deluxe, by and through its counsel, Robert Smith, for its Answer states and alleges the following:

1. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation contained in paragraph 1 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS Fitness center member Gina Stelluti sustained various injuries while participating in a fitness class. The plaintiff in this case claimed that her injuries were the result of the defendant’s negligence in regards to failing to repair the broken exercise bike, which had caused the injuries to the plaintiff. The defendant had filed for a motion for summery. The original trial court had granted that request. This request was granted due to a liability contract that cleared the defendant of negligence and gross negligence.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appellant challenged the judgment of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas (Ohio) which granted summary judgment in favor of appellees, restaurant and distributor, in a products liability action regarding a clam shell.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smith filed a complaint in trial court claiming that the store was negligent with maintaining safety of their store. She is seeking damages for injuries that she suffered from the fall. The store claims that Smith is just as much at fault as they are and that she was not paying attention to where she was walking because she was too distracted by her child.…

    • 530 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    STATEMENT OF THE CASE The matter currently comes before the court on Petitioner Elizabeth Hamilton and counsel’s appeal from the 2nd Circuit award of sanctions under 28 U.S.C § 1927 (2012) for attorney’s fees to Respondent Randall’s Plumbing Supply. (J.A. 8). The initial action was brought by the Petitioner in the Southern District of New York alleging she was wrongfully terminated and seeking to recover against Respondent. (J.A. at 4.)…

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PA205

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On or about April 8, 2013, the plaintiff was en route back to his home after signing a three-year contract with MCI records after winning National Idol. The plaintiff was riding his motorcycle southbound on Highway 57 going a speed of 60-65 miles per hour. The defendant’s driver flashed his lights signaling the need to pass which the plaintiff obliged to. The plaintiff swerved to avoid falling cases of beer but was struck.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Class V.: Case Study

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (#4-7) According to the case, the plaintiff should not be held as semi liable for his injuries while attending the Daytona International Speedway. My client should receive a decision in his favor because NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway were and are negligent in how races are conducted, the design of the speedway, and the lack of safety barriers to protect spectators, such as my client, from being severely injured during an event. There were several issues that NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway are responsible for that resulted in the traumatic injury my client sustained. According to my client the numerous problems that resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries are:…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nadel Law Case Essay Example

    • 5133 Words
    • 15 Pages

    On a morning in early December 1993, plaintiff-appellant Paul Nadel was driving his son, plaintiff-appellant Christopher, and two younger daughters, Ashley and Brittany, to school.1 Paul's mother, plaintiff-appellant Evelyn Nadel, was seated next to the passenger window. Christopher was seated in the front seat between Evelyn and Paul, with one foot on the transmission hump and one foot on the passenger side of the hump. Brittany and Ashley were in the back seat. On the way, they ordered breakfast from the drive-through window of a Burger King restaurant owned and operated by defendant-appellee Emil, Inc. (“Emil”) under a franchise agreement with defendant-appellee Burger King Corporation (“BK”). Paul's order included several breakfast sandwiches and drinks and two cups of coffee. The cups of coffee were fitted with lids and served in a cardboard container designed to hold four cups, with the two cups placed on opposite diagonal corners. Emil's employee served the coffee through the car window to Paul, who passed it to Christopher, who handed it to Evelyn.…

    • 5133 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Complainant denies that she requested her deposit and states that Martinez handed it to her when she arrived at Respondents’ office. Complainant states that Martinez was rude and abrupt with her during the entire encounter; most critically, he interrupted her…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ( Raley & Burnor p.g. 215) Case 9, pp. 130-131 The parties involved…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caudle v. Betts

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plaintiff filed suit against Bett and the company individually, seeking damages for past pain and suffering, lost motion and enjoyment of life, past medical expenses, loss of earning, and future damages for the permanent paralysis in his right scalp. After a bench trial, the district court found that the defendant intended to shock the plaintiff but did not intend to injure him beyond a momentary, unpleasant jolt and ruled in favor of the defendant.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We are in receipt of your client’s objections and answers/responses to Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories, First Request for Production and Request for Disclosure. In your clients’ answer/response to Interrogatories Nos. 11, 12 and 21, Request for Production No. 7, and Request for Disclosure (d), your client states that he is not seeking recovery of damages for loss of earnings and/or loss of future earning capacity. This is inconsistent with Paragraph 8.1 of your client’s current petition wherein he states that he is seeking to recover for such damages. Also, in answer to Defendants’ Interrogatory No. 13, your client states that he is not seeking damages for physical disfigurement. Again, Paragraph 8.1 of your client’s petition states…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Regulation

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kriethen, Baron & Carpey. (2012). Examples of Tort Violations Where it is Best to Hire a…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law of tort

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Week 8 Lecture Aspects of the Tort of Negligence 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Problem Solving

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Edwards, L., Stanley, E., & Patricia, K. (2012). Tort Law. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays