Preview

Summary Of Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
508 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals
Jeremy Rifkin is an American writer, public speaker, and activist who wrote a meaningfully dense article for the Los Angeles Times titled "A Change Of Heart About Animals." His article defends animal rights and disputes many myths regarding animals. Rifkin argues that animals do have a sense of individualism, they experience emotions, they learn from past experiences, and that “They are more like us than we imagined” (). After reading the article, I can personally say that I agree with Rifkin, albeit my only problem is drawing the line between advocating for animals rights and extremism.

Animal rights are rights given to animals that allow them to live a life without ill-treatment and corporate exploitation. PETA founder Ingrid Newkirk has said, “When it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. Each one values his or her life and fights the knife”(). I agree that animals should have compassion shown towards them, as they have a life worth living. At the same time, I don't believe that an animal's
…show more content…
Ariel Garlow, a student of Philosophy at McMaster University, states in her article “A Fox Is a Cow Is a Cat: Why We Treat Animals Differently” a few problems that I find in the vegan mindset. Garlow states that “All animals – human, fox, cat, elephant, and more – have unique traits that shape who we are. But if we search hard enough, we find no specific trait in any animal that justifies the exploitation of their species” (). I don’t agree with animals exploitation as their nature should not be stripped away for commercial purposes. Then again if it came to the lives of human to the lives of animals, I am going to strive for us. Victoria Braithwaite, in Hooked On A Myth, poses a similar statement. Braithwaite states that although animals should have right, as they suffer, “where should we draw the line?”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am writing to you regarding Mr. Jeremy Rifkin’s article.”A Change Of Heart About Animals” I personally didnt agree with much of what Rifkin said.To me he is a man who just talks and doesnt really go in to depth or think what hes trying to say through.He reccomended we give pigs toys so that they would be more happier and less agressive.Mr. Bob Stevens on the other hand had an amazing argument to what Mr.Rifkin was saying it was outstanding.Rifkin makes an argument saying that we should be more sympathetic on how we treat our animals.Logically there is million of kids in the world who do not have toys but have familes and can not afford them.So there is a dirty pig who is destin for slaughter that is given the oppurtunity to have toys,they…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Trunk Full of Empathy Throughout the years the generation among us has become less selfless. We worry less about those around us and worry more about what we’re going to consume for dinner or how many likes a picture of yourself will get.. In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, (published by Los angeles Times) “A Change of Heart about Animals”, he describes that animals are more like us humans than we think and that our empathy needs to constantly become stronger towards animals. Rifkin gives us a plethora of rhetorical ways to persuade readers to feel more towards animals. One strategy Rifkin utilizes is to note how other countries, universities and groups have already begun to discuss the right to animals.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin. This article talks about how animals are so much like us. Jeremy Rifkin asserted in his September fifth letter announcing that creatures were equipped for each feeling an individual was, and requesting that all individuals augment a feeling of balance and compassion to living creatures equivalent to that they would give an alternate person. This is clearly preposterous and, in the event that you truly make a stride back and take a gander at the procedure behind the thought, unexpected.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading the article A Change of Heart about Animals by Jeremy Rifkin . I conclude that Rifkin is really interested in the way animals feel and the research that proves animals are just like humans . He is persuading us to think that animals are just like us by giving lots of examples of animals having emotions just like humans do. There is also lots of science that leads me to believe animals are just like us. Like the studies researchers have done on pigs, they need attention to stay happy because keeping them isolated or alone will make the pig feel depressed.I feel like animals should have their own rights because they are very intelligent and some, like Koko the gorilla, can communicate with humans. Betty and Abel the…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkins argues that animals should be treated in a more humane way. I agree with Rifkins argument because I have seen animals get abuse and it should not be like that. People may say that they do not feel anything but THEY DO! It’s similar to when a humane it getting abused. Many researchers are finding that the animals are similar to us in many ways: they feel pain, suffer, and experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love. Rifkins give scientific evidence to support his argument from credible source and make his stronger.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that more than 50% of the fur in the United States comes from China, where there are no penalties for abusing animals, which are raised in unbearably cramped and run-down cages on fur farms? Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have emotions, feel pain, and are being forced into painful experiments.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article on September 1st of the Los Angeles Times, Jeremy Rifkin claims animals have the same understanding and concept of emotions we humans have, and that we should treat them as our equals. This idea of his is absurd, and if you really look at it you can see, he is just another animal rights activist trying to get his voice heard.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ear Editor, In “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, he says that “Animals are more like us than we could imagine” and I think I’m kind of on this middle plane where I can see both sides of the argument. Cause while I do realize that animals are living things and how they have all the components of one, I still believe it is ok to farm and use them for our needs. I say that in a good and humane way, as to make sure the animals are brought up in the right way. Now to get this out the way I am no way a vegan.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your newspaper published an editorial “A Change of Heart about Animals” September 1, 2003 by Jeremy Rifkin, author and president of the Foundation on Economic Trends, in which Rifkin suggests that the center of the human experience is about extending concern to wider and wider realms to the species we share the world with (34). He implies throughout the article that animals like us, feel pain, experience stress, affection, excitement, and even love (33) . He claims that animals should be treated better because they experience similar emotions we do. By focusing on the ideal of extending the amount of empathy we give to animals, Jeremy Rifkin overlooks the deeper issue of how these creatures of the world feel about us because he does not consider that like them, we…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two philosophers I explained above comes from both sides of the argument. Lori Gruen perspective shows how animals are sentimental and have interest and well-beings. On the other hand, Rene Descartes believes animals lack a mind and soul and you cannot harm them because they don't possess thoughts and feelings. Although, both Lori and Rene share the same passion they do not come across the same conclusion. If I was to ask them a series of questions on animal ethics there answers would be completely different.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Research Essay OutlineI. IntroductionA. Definition of animal rights-the belief that non-human animals have interests and rights similar to humans and deserve the same respectB. Background information on the issueC. The discussion of animal rights and whether or not animals deserve the same rights as humans has been prevalent in society since the early 1800s, but animals do reserve the same rights to a life free from the terror of being hunted and the pain of abuse and experimentation; therefore, the solution is to create more laws in favor of animals’ rights and to prosecute those who choose to ignore these laws.II. HistoryA. Research says each side tries to goad the other in an effort to undermine themB. Research says the side for animal rights has been fighting for their cause since the 19th centuryC. OppositionIII. Addressing the IssueA. Research says animal rights activists have a valid point…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays