Meanwhile, Franklin’s existence was based on doing good for society. He was a public figure, an activist, a revolutionary. He was not out to manipulate society in a negative sense, which is how Warner’s wording makes it seem. Franklin did not allow himself to generalization in order to keep his writing as unbiased as possible. He understood that in order to help society, he must create a discussion that allows the audience to think and establish their own opinions and arguments. This exact argument can be seen through the Dogood Papers. At first glance, these letters seem like a flow of a persons opinions and complaints. However, Franklin wrote them with the intention of creating a discussion within society on these particular problems. Warner argues that because Franklin did not have anything in common with Mrs. Dogood when he wrote the letters, the claims are valid, and to some extent, I agree. However, Franklin had to include his own biases, because without them, he would have nothing to write
Meanwhile, Franklin’s existence was based on doing good for society. He was a public figure, an activist, a revolutionary. He was not out to manipulate society in a negative sense, which is how Warner’s wording makes it seem. Franklin did not allow himself to generalization in order to keep his writing as unbiased as possible. He understood that in order to help society, he must create a discussion that allows the audience to think and establish their own opinions and arguments. This exact argument can be seen through the Dogood Papers. At first glance, these letters seem like a flow of a persons opinions and complaints. However, Franklin wrote them with the intention of creating a discussion within society on these particular problems. Warner argues that because Franklin did not have anything in common with Mrs. Dogood when he wrote the letters, the claims are valid, and to some extent, I agree. However, Franklin had to include his own biases, because without them, he would have nothing to write