She takes such gross liberties with the language and manages to squeeze out so little of her mutilations that at times her own stylistics are sadder than her case. At one point she decides to hit the reader with something to the equivalent of this, “!!!!!!!!!” We know what she meant, but it lousy attempt to try and deduce feelings of frustration, bewilderment, amazement, etc, to a single knot of symbols. This is what happens when women try to use words sometimes. They try to express complex emotions through strange use of symbols, elaborate argumentation, and other such sure failures in expression. Emotion cannot be expressed on the page. You can say she was such and such a thing, but it is better to leave the reader to conclude for themselves what the feelings are, and sympathize with that. You need to contextualize. If you say your favorite dog died, I immediately sympathize. So, you cannot ask me to sympathize with you by simply saying that you are sad, let alone writing
She takes such gross liberties with the language and manages to squeeze out so little of her mutilations that at times her own stylistics are sadder than her case. At one point she decides to hit the reader with something to the equivalent of this, “!!!!!!!!!” We know what she meant, but it lousy attempt to try and deduce feelings of frustration, bewilderment, amazement, etc, to a single knot of symbols. This is what happens when women try to use words sometimes. They try to express complex emotions through strange use of symbols, elaborate argumentation, and other such sure failures in expression. Emotion cannot be expressed on the page. You can say she was such and such a thing, but it is better to leave the reader to conclude for themselves what the feelings are, and sympathize with that. You need to contextualize. If you say your favorite dog died, I immediately sympathize. So, you cannot ask me to sympathize with you by simply saying that you are sad, let alone writing