The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…
Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…
In this paper, I will analyze both Hobbes’ and Rousseau’s view on the Nature of Man. Through my analysis of both, I will show contrast and comparison between both philosophical views. I will identify and explain the central aspect of the Nature of Man as identified by Hobbes and Rousseau and will make connections through a series of explanations and examples that were presented by Hobbes and Rousseau.…
Desires are only based upon what a person wants most, but they do not always truly embody what is most important. Even if a person’s second-order volition desire is based upon good intentions it could be detrimental when decided upon as a first-order desire because it is based on want. In Gary Watson’s “Free Agency” he writes that “‘what one most wants’ may mean either ‘the object of the strongest desire’ or ‘what one most values.’ The problem of free action arises because what one desires may not be what one values”(209). Desires do not lead to what is truly beneficial to a person’s life because they do not accurately evaluate what is valuable in their life. In order for a second-order volition to be the most rewarding, a person’s desires have to be founded upon their values. The values of a man have been formed around a lifetime of experience and are based upon more then what they want. Higher order questions become easily solvable when the desires are formed upon what a person truly values. While people can have many desires, they only truly value certain aspects of their lives, and the desire that is the most important to ones values should be their first-order…
You denounce it. You disarm it,” by repeating the first word to each sentence helps demonstrate the idea that indifference cannot operate by itself; only a person's authority can let the consequences of indifference influence humanity. At this point, Wiesel’s critical tone focuses on playing with the audience’s emotion to allow other who are have not yet grasp the reaction indifference towards humanity. Nevertheless, indifference has been repeated multiple times as he uses this technique to conclude that indifference gives no effect, “Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response. Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy… Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment.” This is another key point to help wrap up the perception of Indifference. The section is developed around the topic of indifference. Wiesel’s comparisons and choice of structure help support his claim of how much destruction indifference can cause, provides different perspectives for those in front of him and increase the intensity of his tone as he approaches the climax of the…
That men are sinister in the State of Nature could be promoted as a headline to Hobbes’s magnum opus, Leviathan. In the state of nature, men are not magnanimous beings. A notion similar to the first sin, yet different from a philosopher like Jean Jacque Rousseau. It has always been taken for granted that there are wicked and virtuous humans, yet for Hobbes, humans are innately wicked. These notions, however abstract and contradictory they may seem, are demonstrated in this short paper; Hobbes’s chapter 13 of Leviathan is abridged in this paper. First, the inclinations that drive men to behave in a wicked way are outlined step by step. Then Hobbes’s reason for having a common power is established. Generally, this paper is a reflection on Chapter 13 of Leviathan with explanation and commentary.…
Man’s nature is evil; goodness is a result of a conscious activity. The nature of man is such that he is born with a fondness for profit. If he indulges this fondness, it will lead him to wrangling and strife, and all sense of courtesy and humility will disappear. He is born with feelings of envy and hate, and if he indulges these, they will lead him to violence and crime, and all sense of loyalty and good faith will disappear. Man is born with the desires of eyes and ears, with a fondness for beautiful sights and sounds. If he indulges these, they will lead him to license and wantonness, and all ritual principles and correct forms will be lost. Hence, any man who follows his nature and indulges his emotions will inevitably become involved in wrangling and strife, will violate the forms and rules of society and will end as a criminal. Therefore, man must first be transformed by the instructions of the teacher and guided by ritual principles, and only then he will be able to observe the dictates of courtesy and humility, obey the forms and rules of society, and achieve order. It is obvious from this then, that man’s nature is evil, and that his goodness is the result of conscious activity.…
have to wear handicaps. More attractive people have to wear red noses, face masks, and false teeth so they don’t appear more attractive than the others who do not wear them. The stronger you are the more weights you have to wear. Even with these things the people still are not equal. If one person is more intelligent than another that person would have to wear more handicaps or if one person is stronger they would have to wear more weights than the other.…
all men are created equal. However, until very recently in this country this was not the case.…
Human nature: a concept so intricate and esoteric that it has caused bewilderment in the minds of the most intelligent men to have walked on earth. Morality- an important component of human nature- is the ability to choose between right or wrong. Tracing back to our roots, Adam and Eve`s act of disobedience, it is evident that since the beginning of times man has chosen to do wrong, showing that human nature is bad. Still, some insist of its being good, like Socrates, a Greek philosopher, who argued that ``it is impossible for a human being to willingly do wrong because their instinct for self interest prevents them from doing so``. Nevertheless, looking at tragedies like the Holocaust or World War II, one has reasons to believe that man is definitely wicked and evil. William Golding begs to differ and believes that although man is indeed bad, he is also capable of good. His allegorical novel, Lord of the Flies, scrutinizes our iniquitous human nature and reveals mankind`s true potential for evil, acknowledging, however, that good could be found in the most remote areas of man.…
A tip from me is do the essay first question are easier and you can always bullshit and rush the question but you have to think for the essay which you cant do properly under pressure…
1. Desire is what makes people greedy. It is what makes people commit mistakes whether it be material desire or desire for power and knowledge. Desiring something is what makes a person human. It is implanted in a human’s mind that we must acquire what we desire for our personal purposes. These purposes are usually intended for themselves and sometimes require a negative impact in others. Sometimes when you desire something and acquire it, you tend to hurt some others on the way. But having a free soul on the other hand, will make you careless and too free. Being careless will hurt yourself even if you don’t know it. It is not normal for a person to not desire anything for everyone desires something once in a while. This is why we must balance being free spirited and having desires to not hurt the ones we love and ourselves as…
The only thing holding women back from competition with men is their own lack of physical capabilities. Women are, generally, naturally smaller and less muscular than men, especially in the types of muscles and size required for games like basketball and football.…
Next, Women have more athleticism than men. Women can run longer, they are flexible, jump high, and more. So that means women have more athleticism than men. But men can be way stronger than women because men have more muscle mass and bone mass than women. So women are flexible and fast, men are strong and fast. But it can be different because women can be strong and fast to.…
Hobbes credits to each person in the state of nature a liberty right to preserve herself, which he terms “the right of nature”. This is the right to do whatsoever one sincerely judges requiring for one's protection; yet because it is at least possible that virtually anything might be judged necessary for one's protection, this hypothetically limited right of nature becomes in practice an unlimited right to potentially anything, or, as Hobbes puts it, a right “to all things”. Hobbes further assumes that people should accept what they see to be the necessary means to their most important ends.…