The article makes use of tables, charts, and diagrams to explain to the reader how each contributing factor such as a strong
The article makes use of tables, charts, and diagrams to explain to the reader how each contributing factor such as a strong
By comparing total crimes per population, we concluded the population per square mile is not a factor in determining the amount of crime: York County has a population of 9.01persons per square mile and it’s a high-crime county and Lane County has a population of 13.7 persons per square mile and is also a high-crime county; on the other hand, Lake County has a population of 4528.1 persons per square mile and Lee County has a population of 5609.25 persons per square mile and they are both considered low-crime counties. Therefore, our metric using total crimes, instead of a breakdown of individual categories of crimes and population provide the best methodology to identify and classify the levels of crime levels in the counties of…
Furthermore, while watching the documentary, I was interested in how the ban of abortion impacted the national crime rates in the 1990’s and 2000’s. It was found that the cohort of children born between 1967 and 1969 had lower crime rates than those born prior to 1976. Meanwhile, the cohort of children born after 1970 had higher crime rates than those born prior to the ban of abortion. However, the degree of change of crime rates between these cohorts is minimal. However, Pop-Eleches does admit that there exist a variety of factors that contribute to the country’s crime rates, and that his findings are not dependent on the banning of abortion (Pop-Eleches 2006:767).…
The duo validates their argument by pointing at how the candid laws that initially permitted abortion and those that later followed that prohibited it impacted crime rates in the US either negatively or positively. In this work, I have applied Wolcott's "Steps for Better Thinking" for providing answers for the reason behind the experienced crime rate reduction.…
In Chapter 4 of Freakonomics, the main subject is the question on why criminal activity has declined so rapidly at such a sharp rate in time. This chapter goes in depth and explains the relevance between abortions and the impact it had on society. While crime is still going on today the overall statistics of criminal actions has decreased at such a high numbers many questions were asked on how and why this has happened. This chapter goes into detail on the 1990’s in which one big law was passed that ultimately resulted in a lower population of criminals in the United States.…
Individuals lead to crime for slightly different reasons which relate to their unique genetic character, their corresponding mental ability, their socialization and life circumstances; it is the interplay of these and other variables, any one of which may be more determinative in a particular case that causes a particular individual to resort to crime. Consequently, crime, like poverty, doesn't lend itself very well to comprehensive solutions, unless these solutions simultaneously address all the dominant factors underlying its causation in the majority of cases. The “Urban Society-Gesellshaft Thesis” goes on to say that important normative constraint which served to deter criminal behavior in the past tend to be absent in modern urban societies. The dramatic increase in crime in the 19th and 20th centuries has been attributed to the absence of a sense of community in urban societies.…
The central thesis and argument of this segment of Freakonomics are the reasons why the rates of crime in the United States rapidly reduce in recent years. I think this argument that Steven Levitt reasonably explains about decreasing American criminal rates in possible points. As Levitt’s explanations, he is arguing that an increase in the reliance on prisons, innovative policing strategies, changes in the crack market, lawful enforcements including to increase in police nationwide and gun-control laws, and a legalization of abortion. I personally also think that all of these reasons are definitely…
Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. In F. Cullen & R. Agnew (Eds.), Criminological Theory Past to…
Many commonly conceivable explanations are given as the answer to this such as increased number of police, more imprisonment, and an expanded police force. However, a more anomalous explanation for the drop in crime was that of legalized abortion. When abortion was made legal after the Roe vs. Wade case, the amount of women who had abortions increased dramatically. Levitt stated that studies showed, “childhood poverty and a single-parent household-are among the strongest predictors that a child will have a criminal future”(138). He also explained that “abortion led to less unwantedness; unwantedness leads to high crime; legalized abortion, therefore, led to less crime”(139). This theory is something that reaches so far out of the common person’s comfort zone and appears to be so unbelievable; it stretches beyond our common way of thinking. However, the statistics suggest that this could be a very accurate reason behind the drastic drop in crime. For example, a statistic Levitt includes in his argument states, “Since 1985, states with high abortion rates have experienced a roughly 30 percent drop in crime relative to low-abortion…
In the novel Freakonomics, Levit and Dubner try to take a unique approach to analyzing reasons behind why things occur in our society. Essentially, “What this book is about is stripping a layer or two from the surface of modern life and seeing what is happening underneath.” (10) A perfect example of this is how they discovered that the legalization of abortion was the cause of crime dropping to its lowest level in thirty-five years. While most expert economists simply attributed the drop to the wellness of the economy, the increase in gun control laws and the new policing strategies, Levit and Dubner searched for other possibilities where no one else thought to look. That is when they realized that approximately twenty years before the drastic drop in crime, abortion was legalized. Studies have shown that “… a child born into an adverse family environment is far more likely than other children to become a criminal.” (4) Thus, this theory was proven further by the fact that around the time when these children would have begun committing crimes, there was significantly less crime.…
Sometimes the best way to take off a band aid isn’t to rip it off quickly. Such a rigid shock can cause excessive discomfort. He argues that crime has dropped in that past 20 years because of the legalization of abortion. Abortion is an extremely sensitive topic and debating it, in the USA, has essentially become taboo. Families that tend to practice abortion, using that phrase loosely, are more likely to raise children that become criminals. They aren’t able to raise the children well in their economic struggle.…
At first glance of the cityscape the thought may arise on why crime is not the principle personal concern. However, decades of research suggest poverty is the driving force for crime. The Greek philosopher Aristotle wrote “poverty is the parent of crime.” Nevertheless, poverty, crime and the lack of education are all related.…
Levitt also believed that legalization of abortion was the real crime stopper. Legalized abortion led to less unwantedness; unwantedness leads to high crime; legalized abortion, therefore, led to less crime. He believed that the children born after Roe vs. Wade hit their adolescent years the crime began to fall. This meant if the mothers that did not want children and had those children were more likely to be the criminals, then the mothers that wanted children and were brought up with fathers were less likely to cause any crimes. He tested this theory by looking at the effects. Measure the crime data in the five states that abortion was legal before the law changed. Which come to find out the crime rates did indeed drop.…
This chapter tackles the complex questions surrounding the sudden crime drop of the 1990’s. It dissects a slew of possible reasons and comes to a conclusion that wasn’t even originally listed, but was talked about at the beginning of the chapter. It begins discussing Nicolae Ceausescu, the communist dictator of Romania, and his abolishment of abortion. He felt the increase of child birth would ensure it a rapid increase of national strength. And he was right. Birth rate doubled, but these children had it worse in almost every way. They had lower test scores, bad luck finding jobs in the market, and were more likely to be criminals. This ban stayed in effect until the family lost control in 1989. The protesters were all very young and unhappy with their lives.…
Criminologists believe that the decline is a result of varying factors in the criminal justice system. There is a causal link between legalized abortion and the drop in crime during the 1990’s. The implementation of the Three Strikes Law in state governments has also aided in decreasing crime rates. These factors function cohesively to affect crime rates. Conversely, the economy impact has the weakest correlation to be able to account for the reduction. Crime rates in the United States have steadily declined in the past twenty years due to the legalization of abortion as well as the implementation of the three strikes law.…
There are multiple factors that play in the crime wave we see. I feel a major problem that contributes to the problem is poverty. For year’s people though that poverty just caused because of the stereotypic mindset that this is America and anything is possible here. But that’s not the case for others (Cause and Effects p.2). Today it…