Summary Of Take The F

Response Essay 2
In the article by Ian Frazier, “Take the F” describes about Brooklyn, New York. Frazier mentions that, in Brooklyn people do not use term north, west, south or east to describe their location. Instead they use neighborhood and nearest subway lines. He gives a clear and detailed description about his neighborhood and F train he uses. Furthermore, he mentions about a group of people as well as diversity he sees around. I like the way Frazier had given all the details to explain the community. So, the purpose behind writing this article was to describe his lifestyle in the Brooklyn. In the middle of the article, he explains the visit to Montana and about his daughter who is six years old. The way she grew up, she turned out to be
This all adds the intellectual and thematically themes by describing that people who grew up in the city has a different perspective about small towns and New York train has the diversity and the incident which takes place on a train. Furthermore, I like the way the author has described all the events with details with his observation. At the last, removing the personal narrative from the article would not make any big differences. While changing personal narrative to objective, it will simply turn into analysis based on observation article. For example, as Frazier said that “At Grand Army Plaza, I have seen traffic tieups caused by Haitians and others rallying in support of President Aristide, and by St. Patrick’s Day parades, and by the Jews of the Lubavitcher sect celebrating birthday of their Grand Rebbe with a slow procession of ninety-three motor homes- one for each year of his life.” To convert this to objective- “At Grand Army Plaza, the traffic tieups caused by Haitians and others rallying in support of President Aristide, and by St. Patrick’s Day parades, and by the Jews of the Lubavitcher sect celebrating birthday of their Grand Rebbe with a slow procession of ninety-three motor homes- one for each