Summary Of The Yes Side

The author of the yes side is, Andreas Hillgruber. The author of the no side is, Ian Kershaw. The major thesis of the yes side is, german scholar and history professor Andreas Hillgruber states that Hitler systematically pursued his foreign policy goals once he came to power in Germany and that World War II was the inevitable result. The major thesis on the no side is, Ian kershaw, a professor of history at the University of Sheffield, argues that Hitler was responsible for the execution of German foreign policy that led to World War II but was not free from forces both within and outside Germany that influenced his decisions. Two facts presented by the yes side are: Hitler occupying the demilitarized zone of the Rhineland on March 7, 1936,
Two opinions stated by the yes side are that Hitler's war plans were radically simplified compared to German war goals in the first World War, also that Hitler could only escape his predicament of dealing with the Western coalition and having not built up German forces by rapid and risky military action. Two opinions by the no side are even though a large number of military advisors shared secret planning to reoccupy the Rhineland the decision was made by Hitler alone, and that the timing of Nazi withdrawal from the League of Nations and reversed relations with Russia and Poland were done all because of Hitler's initiatives. When researching I can not find any proof that the Hitler's war plans were radically simplified compared to German war goals of WWI or that Hitler's only choice was to start war to deal with his predicament with his own military and the Western coalition. Also, for the no side, I could not find any proof that reoccupying the Rhineland was all Hitlers decision or that the decisions made to withdraw from the League of Nations, as well as reversing relations with Russia and Poland were done all because of Hitler's