The Yes Side Analysis

The book Taking Sides written by Glenn L. Koonce questions “Is There Support for Arming Teachers in school?” The author includes both side of the stories, the yes side is written by Nirvi Shah, and Trump spoke on behalf of the National School Safety and Security Services, which supported the no side. Both of sides have great support for their ideas, for example Shah says that the school officials are usually the first responders to the situation, while they cannot do anything to aid, because they are not armed. While Trump says that well trained law enforcement officer should tackle on bad situations that involves guns. They both have good arguments on if the school staff should be armed or should they just really on well-trained officers for
He has point that all the school officials are the first responders to the bad situation but they cannot do anything without a gun. Some school districts are allowing the teachers to carry a concealed weapon, where the police station is not close enough for them to respond quickly enough. Schools are just trying to just handle a bad situation until the help arrive. Some of the schools staff said that they would rather attack the intruder rather then let the situation get worse. They forget that if they were to die by the intruders gun, the rest of the people they were suppose to protect are now vulnerable. If a bad situation were to raise the, school staff that is present would be able to control the situation with a gun. The author is trying to support that the teachers should be armed, while he is giving reason why they should not be, like he said that practicing shooting is important, but the school staff might hurt the students they are trying to protect. The schools that are located within one mile of a police station are defenseless for five minutes until the police arrive. The teachers that would be selected to carry a concealed weapon would also put on major responsibilities on