Preview

Summary Of There's No Crisis Of Free Speech By David Shariatmadari

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
284 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of There's No Crisis Of Free Speech By David Shariatmadari
David Shariatmadari’s article “There’s No Crisis of Free Speech” imbedded an entirely new idea into my head: There is no censorship of speech, but backlash and opposition to what people say. In a particular way, this method of reaction can be restrictive of one’s freedom of speech, but in no way is a campus backlash against a speaker a prime, direct example of the end of First Amendment rights. In my opinion, however, there should be no reason that one should not be able to or be obliged to express their thoughts and opinions on the soil of the United States. It would not be morally correct for audience members to resort to violence whatsoever, as everyone is entitled to their own opinions. For no one, by any means, is trying to impose their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1988 was a great year for Larry Flynt, the publisher of a highly criticized magazine called, “Hustler.” This magazine was unlike any of its predictors, such as Playboy. While sexuality was on the rise, so were “new” ways to do it. Hustlers’ publisher, Larry Flynt was merely exposing what people were already doing. This does not mean that everyone had the same sexual desires as everyone else, but he did become popularized by certain “hardcore” sexually active persons. While he became a hero amongst some, there seems to have been more against what Flynt was doing. It has been documented that even some of his staff did not agree, saying that he was making men out to be rapists, and making comparisons to men being like “stud bulls,” wanting to have sex with “everything in sight.”…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But according to court rulings, “public expression is speech and I cannot think of a single Supreme Court case that has ever deemed public expression to be harassment” (Erwin). Many Supreme Court rulings never explore speech for its harassment, but more of how it should protect the people’s constitutional rights of the first amendment. In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, students wore armbands as a way of expressing their opinion on the Vietnam war. Those who didn’t remove the armbands would ultimately be set in suspension from the school. The court ruled that “in our system, undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance is not enough to overcome the right to freedom of expression” (Saunders).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Free speech is not to be regulated. The audience that hissed yesterday may applaud today, even for the same performance.” –Michael Douglas…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Roger Rosenblatt endured in countries of constrained inhabitants, “the secret publication of books, the pirated music, the tricky subversive lines of poetry read at vast gatherings of tens of thousands. And the below the surface comedy” (503) will continuously arise no matter the discouragement present. In a country founded on its freedoms, the retraction of any of those privileges will be met with extreme adversity. Moreover, “since free is the way people's minds were made to be” (Rosenblatt 502) the restriction of verbal expression will only cause riots and outrage. Currently, various universities and colleges have faced the backlash of unjust speech limitations on their campuses. One student attending a college in Arizona prepares to sue the school for, “her school’s so-called “speech zone,” arguing the policy “severely limited” her right to free speech and due process” (Harkness). Reactions to a decrease in the liberty to speak freely induces immediate retaliation and hardship, in addition, to being entirely unnecessary. To keep the peace and stability, the United States must keep the freedom of speech as it was intended to be used, freely.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    continues to explain that Texas Tech bans students to a freedom of speech zone which is only a gazebo that can hold no more than forty people. If a student would like to engage in any type of freedom of speech activities outside of this zone, then they must have approval six days before the activity (504). The fact that students are not permitted to speak their mind freely outside of the gazebo without permission is saddening. Higher authorities are limiting the thoughts of not only students, but also all people because of the fear that they will insult someone or they will speak out against their rules. Freedom of speech should not be limited to a certain zone with only a certain amount of students to hear it because the founding fathers did not intend for it be like this. They came from a country where they were not permitted to have their own opinion; therefore, they wanted the United States to allow freedom of speech whenever and wherever. Limiting speech is limiting diversity, knowledge, and opinion; moreover, censorship is not allowing the country to grow. Rampell continues to state “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders at Wesleyan and…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American Citizens our freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution’s first Amendment which “guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition…” (Cornell Law 2017), but that doesn’t or shouldn’t give anyone the right to cause harm or violence against another person or group of people if we do not agree or share the same beliefs. The laws were created to protect us, but many people interpret the laws differently and therefore, feel entitled to speak freely even if it causes…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Week 9's Final

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If our legal reality truly reflected our political rhetoric about liberty, Americans and especially American college and university students would be enjoying a truly remarkable freedom to speak and express controversial ideas at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Virtually every public official declares a belief in "freedom of speech." Politicians extol the virtues of freedom and boast of America’s unique status as a nation of unfettered expression. Judges pay homage to free speech in court opinions. Even some fringe parties’ communists and fascists who would create a totalitarian state if they were in power have praised the virtues of the freedom they need for their survival. Few individuals speak more emphatically on behalf of freedom of speech and expression, however, than university administrators, and few institutions more clearly advertise their loyalty to this freedom than universities themselves. During the college application process, there is a very high probability that you received pamphlets, brochures, booklets, and catalogs that loudly proclaimed the university’s commitment to "free inquiry," "academic freedom," "diversity," "dialogue," and "tolerance."You may have believed these declarations, trusting that both public and private colleges and universities welcome all views, no matter how far outside the mainstream, because they want honest difference and debate.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American citizens, according to the 1st Amendment in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States, we have the right to freedom of speech. However, in certain vicinities, such as public schools, that freedom is limited. Teachers for example, cannot discuss their own political or religious views with students. In addition, neither the teacher nor the student is allowed to profane. These types of restrictions are justified by saying there is a certain time and place for those subjects and school is not the proper place. School is for fundamental education and obtaining a broad view of the world without students being compelled into believing or acting based on the views of the teachers.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racist speech

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Charles R. Lawrence III, a professor of law at Stanford University, wrote the article “On Racist Speech” against the growing incidence of racial violence, especially in University campuses in the U.S. A college campus has the status of a “home” for the students residing therein, and as such any racist aggression or violence in general and racist speech in particular have the potential to disturb the law, order, and harmony in the social environment, apart from causing injury to the victims of such racial behavior. This paper attempts to analyze the reasons and arguments mooted by Lawrence to demand that racist speech must be regulated, more so in a college campus environment. It also examines how such regulation will impinge upon, or impact, the rights assured under the First Amendment.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1st Amendment

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For Instance, if the public was not able to possess freedom of speech than people would be force to be fastidious about the things they say. Politics, Speech in the classroom, Speech related to college and university governance, or Research related speech are all prime examples of why higher education is critical to the first amendment and freedom of speech. Even faculty members see continuing aggressive challenges to what they are allowed to say publicly or through an email privately. If you ask me, faculty members, academic professionals, or anyone should have a right to freely express themselves both in the classroom and externally because we all play an important role in providing necessary criticism, insight and invention to society. Ineffective or bad communication is equivalent to not exhibiting your opinions.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Newsweek's cover story by Nina Burleigh "The battle against 'hate speech' on college campuses gives rise to a generation that hates speech”, raises so many questions regarding the issue of hate speeches in college campuses. In this article, Burleigh explains that current issue about the "war on free speech" effect the current situations of college graduates. She highlights that so many things are responsible which are responsible for the recent incidents including students, management of college/universities, Department of Education and activists. Also, she provides a comparison between the George Orwell's "Thought Police" or East Germany’s Stasi with the recent climate on college campuses. Another example of hate speech she explained is the…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Issue

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Being able to express one’s self is one of the most important rights of the people to maintain a connected society right to speech should be accepted to do so. The first amendment is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals have. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. This amendment describes the principal rights of the citizens of the United States. If the citizens were unable to criticize the government, it would be impossible to regulate order. By looking at freedom of speech there is also freedom of assembly and freedom of press that are crucial for the United States democracy. According to the “Derechos, Human Rights”, freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous rights, because it means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. These types of rights are protected by the first amendment. There are groups for example like ACLU and other type of organization. ACLU is “America’s nation's guardian of liberty”, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights that the Constitution protects. We should be allowed to try our first amendment right specifically dealing with freedom of speech.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Profession Outline

    • 3403 Words
    • 14 Pages

    a) The Attorney Client privilege is a shield in evidence which protects all documents created for the client during discovery....if a third party is present the privilege is lost.…

    • 3403 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays