The source lacks credibility due to the fact that it was written by an inexperienced high school student who prioritizes emotion over truth and facts. A small number of genuine facts were utilized and the main idea of opposing armed teachers presented itself many times through repetition. The article all together is biased since Hernandez is frequently exposed to this violence and introduces herself as a high school student when she says “As a student at James A. Garfield High School, I find such a proposition very one-sided and ignorant” (Hernandez). The bias of the article overpowers the main points trying to present themselves since it does not allow the audience to fully comprehend and construct individual ideas. Hernandez uses emotional appeal when she states “I would not feel safe sending my own kid to a school with armed teachers. Parents should not have to fear sending their son/daughter to school every morning due to the presence of guns on campus”
The source lacks credibility due to the fact that it was written by an inexperienced high school student who prioritizes emotion over truth and facts. A small number of genuine facts were utilized and the main idea of opposing armed teachers presented itself many times through repetition. The article all together is biased since Hernandez is frequently exposed to this violence and introduces herself as a high school student when she says “As a student at James A. Garfield High School, I find such a proposition very one-sided and ignorant” (Hernandez). The bias of the article overpowers the main points trying to present themselves since it does not allow the audience to fully comprehend and construct individual ideas. Hernandez uses emotional appeal when she states “I would not feel safe sending my own kid to a school with armed teachers. Parents should not have to fear sending their son/daughter to school every morning due to the presence of guns on campus”