Humans have for centuries tried to alter their state of consciousness using various ways. These ways include dancing, chanting, holding their breath, and various plants or drugs. Drugs were not a concern of the people or of the government until the Chinese railroad workers were smoking opium in the United States. This began to raise concern and led to laws being passed to regulate drugs. However, those laws were replaced with a stricter version called the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. This act called for more enforcement of drugs in the United States. Within this act was the controlled substance act which allowed the government to not only control drugs but also allowed them to be classified. While this…
The WARN Act is a law that formulated to cater for mass layoffs of employees. This law will provide a protective shield to various employees and their individual families by notification to the employees before the closure of the plants they are working in within a 60 day period (Ford et al, 2000). This law majorly applies to companies with a high number of employees and in this case the company that is about to undergo closure has 73 employees.…
Insurance companies wouldn’t have to pay additional costs because once patients sign the release form patients are then responsible to pay for the investigational drugs at market costs. House bill 481 also includes all devices and procedures. In order for patients to be able to qualify for The Right to Try they must be deemed with a terminal illness and have exhausted all possible avenues before they are allowed to try investigational drugs in phase 2 of the 3 phases of FDA procedures. That is if the bill is to be passed then patients must fall under these stipulations. Once Representative Wintrow finished addressing the house committee she introduced Dr. James Quinn.…
The RLA has basic concepts: avoid any interruption to commerce; ensure an unhindered right of employees to join labor union, which was added in 1934; provide complete independence of organization by both parties to carry out the purpose of the RLA. The Norrsi-Laguardia Act (NLA) assist in the prompt and orderly settlement of disputes covering of pay, work rules, or working conditions; assist in the prompt and orderly settlement of disputes growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of existing contracts covering the rates of pay, work rules or working conditions. The NLRA, also known as the Wagner Act, the purpose is to protect the rights of employees, support collective bargaining, and put an end to the abusive practices…
The Uniform Controlled Substances Act was drafted by the United States Department of Justice in 1969. The Uniform Controlled Substances Act brings together a number of laws regulating the manufacture and distribution of any narcotics. All controlled substances are placed in five different schedules, based on medicinal values, harmfulness and potential for abuse or addiction. Narcotics can be refer to as opium and have semi-synthetic substitutes such as; heroin, oxycontin, vicodin, codeine, morphine and fentanyl. Narcotics “opioids” medical uses are prescribed by doctors to treat pain, suppress cough, cure diarrhea and help as a sleep aid. Other manufacture and distribution drugs are stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, anabolic steroids…
A law in relation to defence requires a test of proportionality, so that law-making channels are seen as being able to be “reasonably appropriate and adapted to the purpose of defence”[4]. Thus, in attempting to determine the correct application of the defence power in the current political climate, one must contemplate all facts and circumstances surrounding the threat of terrorism before coming to a conclusion. One must also look back through the history of the defence power to decipher the correct proportional means by which it is applied.…
Mullinex, L. S. (2012, January). Confusion over the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Social science research network, 34(20), 9.…
The year, 1984 saw the introduction of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, also known as the PACE codes. The PACE codes were an act of parliment, the introduction of these codes was to standardise and proffessionalise police work. It basically provides a core framework of police powers and safeguards around stop and search, arrest, detention, investigation, identification and interviewing suspects. Official dissatisfaction with the rules of the criminal process goes back to the mid 1960's when the Home Office asked the Crimial Law Revision Committee to look into the rules of evidence in criminal cases. After their ill fated 11th Report the Home Office shelved the issue until 1977 when the labour government announced that it was to set up a Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, whose terms of reference were to consider the investigation of offences in the light of police powers and duties, aswell as the rights and duties of suspects. The Philips Commission was asked to examine the issues, " Regarding both the interests of the community in bringing offenders to justice and to the rights and liberties of the person accussed or suspected of crime." The Report was well recieved by the police and legal proffesion but not so well by the political left as it was said to be to prosecution minded. In November 1982 the Home secutary introduced the first ever version of the PACE Bill, the bill was highly contrivesal and didnt pass throught the house of commons until October 1984, when it had been subject to many government amendments. The question that remains is why was there a need for such an Act to be passed? As a group it is the stop and search aspect of the codes that we shall be analising, why there was a need for these measures to be in place, what its impact has been and what the code actually involves, aswell as a statistical analysis of the Act.…
itle: Subject: Publisher: Description: Contributors: Effective_date: None Expiration_date: None Type: Document Format: text/plain Language: Rights: SafetyBelt: None ?…
(Farrell 1997). It also enabled the CIA to protect criminals like Barbie Klaus and suppress criminal investigations (Cockburn and St. Clair 1999: 111). Like Barbie, many other intelligence officers were granted exemption from prosecution (Cockburn and St. Clair 1999: 110). Clearly, through providing protection for these individuals despite all their wrongdoings, it can be argued that the law does not apply to everyone and grants those who fulfil the interests of the state exemption from legal criminal status. Thirdly, the CIA maintained complete denial about their involvement with the drug…
The Canada Health Act (CHA) unmistakably forbids “cherry-picking” of patients, stating “no one may be discriminated against on the basis of such factors as income, age, and health status”. It also sets provisions against charging patients for insured services through user charges or extra-billing, a practice that makes discrimination in favor of wealthier patients unprofitable to physicians (Madore). If met and given universal coverage, these provisions imply that greater patient wealth offers no promise of monetary reward to physicians and should, thus, be unimportant when offering a medical appointment.…
What were the advances in information technology that resulted in new ethical issues necessitating the creation of each act?…
Reeves uses diction and details to show the audience the importance of passing the Americans with Disabilities Act. The purpose of the Americans with Disabilities Act is “...to give the disabled access not only to buildings but to every opportunity in society.” This is important because many Americans are hurting and our nation needs to do something about it. Throughout his speech, Reeves explains that he believes we can fix this and find cures because he learned that nothing is impossible.…
The U.S. immigration law is very complicated, and there is a lot of confusion about how it actually works. The Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA), who is the body of law administrating the present immigration policy, provides an annual limit of 675,000 permanent immigrants.…
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) signed into law by president Obama on March 23, 2010 is arguably the most extensive reform of health care law ever to be enacted in the U.S. It will impact the way professionals practice health care, the way insurance companies handle health care as a product, and the way consumers purchase and use health care as a service. The Affordable Health Care Act is primarily aimed at reducing the number of uninsured Americans and reducing the overall costs of health care from an administrative and consumer standpoint. The PPACA requires insurance companies to cover all applicants and offer the same rates to all applicants of the same age regardless of pre-existing conditions, gender or any other intrinsic factors that may deem an individual a particularly “risky” investment for an insurance company. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2009, there were 50.7 million Americans living without health insurance; that amounts to 16.7% of the population (DeNavas-Walt et al.). In order to increase the rate of coverage, the PPACA provides mandates, subsidies, and tax credits to employers and individuals. Since individuals will not be discriminated against on the basis of their health, insurance companies will have larger pools of individuals to cover and the price of insurance will decrease based on the idea that the collective or average risk of any given group of individuals will, theoretically speaking, be less risky than the highest-risk individuals in that group. Because consumers will not be judged on their individual health, the insurance companies, instead, will have to compete for consumer attention and theoretically speaking, market prices of insurance will fall further due to the increased competition between companies (HealthCare.gov). In addition, there will be a mandate in place which will require all individuals not covered by their employer, Medicare, or…