Preview

Summary: The Moral Fabrications Of Meat

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1901 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: The Moral Fabrications Of Meat
The Moral Fabrications of Meat

Dale Cunningham Student ID: D40066798 ENG-135-13386 Advanced Composition Jayme Dahlbeck Bunch

Meat is murder. Eat beans not beings. Friends not food. These are just some of the popular slogans that have cropped up in the latter half of the 20th century in a growing trend among a mostly urban dwelling environmentalist culture. The more radical among them maintain the eating of any sentient animal is immoral and a betrayal of humanity’s stewardship over the planet. The less radical among them insist that the methods used in the manufacture and mass production of our meat products is inhumane and cruel. Both questions will be explored to see if in fact there
…show more content…
They would like to convince themselves that the intelligence from which they derive their ideas is an ill gotten gain. When you eat a hamburger, you are culpable in the murder of an innocent sentient life form. This is the type of moral absolutism that reminds me very much of the kind of blind faith that condemns everyone to the fires of Hell for some mysterious “original sin” without so much as a single rational doubt. Needless to say, there is very little to take seriously with such dogmatic arguments that pre-suppose an irrational premise in order to dictate an equally irrational conclusion. One need only look back at the last billion years of reality in order to find an infinite supply of …show more content…
Many of the conditions mentioned earlier in this paper are very real conditions on some of the huge mega-farms. Do we have a moral responsibility to ensure these animals live a relatively pain free existence before and during processing? Logically speaking, there is absolutely no moral imperative whatsoever to do or not do anything. Though realistically speaking, we are none of us unmoved movers so we must all judge our actions in relation each other and form some rational consensus regarding our situational awareness. Why do we have compassion towards one species of animal like the dog or cat, where we often share our homes and even our lives with, but not towards others animals like the cow or chicken. The short answer to that is because we can. Part of being a creative species with an imagination is having the will to be contradictory and not having to answer to any rigid formula or creed. It’s this very versatility that makes us such a thriving species and why no belief held in common ever stands the test of time, because it must give way, in every instance, to something

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Lisa Hamilton’s “Unconventional Farmers; Let Them Eat Meat”, she justifies the issue of raising livestock for food causing greenhouse gas emissions. Should we be eating less meat or actually eating more? Hamilton’s research found many interesting points that would interest any human beings that consume meat or any other type of consumable goods.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nibert argues about the treatment of domesticated animals on factory farms. Many campaigns, legislations, and ballots have made people switch over to a safe and friendly way of obtaining our food. This strategy called the new welfarism promotes continued oppression of domesecrated and the underlying global injustices and dangers that accompany it (Nibert 259). The welfarism reflects the historical pattern of elites consuming our “meat.” The more affluent consume our chemical free, “humanely” produced “meat,” while the majority consumes the cheap toll that the animal industrial complex profitably can produce. There is not enough land to “free range” the amount of individuals necessary for the growing, socially created need for the domesecrated animal products. All of this can cause the scarcity of water, oil, global warming, diseases, and etc (Nibert 261). In Kenya for example, where ten of thousands are poison have been poisoned, or raised by ranchers who ordered the murder. Facing the reality, not the least of which is violence and exploitation against the growing number of domesecrated animals, is to practice and promote global veganism. Affordable plant based food is all around the world, criticism of people who have no motive to exploiting show be redirected…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought about how the food you’re about to eat was prepared? I know I rarely do, and many of us never pay any mind to what exactly is on our plate. David Foster Wallace’s essay will almost definitely make you ask yourself a few questions regarding meat consumption. His piece talks about the controversy behind killing lobsters and questions people’s general views on that matter, making his audience think about morality.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the course of mankind, “meat has been closely associated with power and privilege—a staple for the gentry and a rare treat for the peasants” (Ruby, Heine 448). Linking back to Campbell’s 1940 beef soup advertisement, beef is illustrated as a “For MEN Only” diet. There is a possibility that the ad’s secret message conveys’ females as being vegans’ since “people’s perceptions of vegetarians found that women were more accepting of vegetarians than men (Walker, 1995)…” (447). Furthermore, “[women’s] attitudes toward vegetarians were predominantly positive, especially among those [that scored] low in authoritarianism (Chin, Fisak, & Sims, 2002), and that omnivores tend to rate vegetarians as good, but weak people (Monin & Minson, 2007).” (447). In other words, women and vegetarians are seen as inferior compared to those who eat meat – though this is seen a generalization/perception in society. On the other hand, vegetarians are also perceived as people that have “a stronger sense of virtue and morality in those who abstain from eating meat” (450), since they abide by “four principal reasons: concern for animal welfare, concern for the environment, concern for health, and disgust at the sensory qualities of meat (e.g. Fox & Ward, 2008; Santos & Booth, 1996; Worsley & Skrzypiec, 1998).” (447). For males,…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Lundberg's essay "Eating Green" delivers the message that the way people eat is how they affect the planet. Lundberg has a very strong argument that the meat industry is the "Largest source of global warming" (Lundberg, 482) and if everyone were to become vegetarians the world be a healthier place. For everyone to become a vegetarian would be a lot to ask; however, Americans love for meat has affected the environment and the personal health of Americans.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People tend to pay as much attention to food as they do brushing their teeth. I urge you, however, to take a step back, slow down, and really think about the food you eat. Eating is a complex thing. It may surprise you. And when you actually think about eating, you will eventually come to think about eating meat. This is no accident, meat has it's pull on humanity. And on our world. The choices we make matter. According to the best-selling author Jonathan Safran Foer, eating the meat we know "is certainly the single worst thing that humans can do to the environment"(457). Foer has been recognized by Rolling Stones Magazine and Esquire for his many accomplishments. In one of his works, "Against Meat", Foer covers the relationship of meat and…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Care Ethics and Animal Welfare” is an article written by Daniel Engster from the Journal of Social Philosophy, published by Wiley Periodicals in 2016. Daniel Engster received his PhD from the University of Chicago and is a professor in the Political Science department at the University of Texas in San Antonio.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Some people become vegetarians after realizing the devastation that the meat industry is having on the environment.” (Vegetarian Times)…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since the beginning of human race, meat has been a primary source of food. From our ancestors hunting animals for meat, to our generation going into a fast food restaurant and ordering a cheeseburger, meat has always been a huge part of our food consumption. Today there are certain groups that look at meat industry as a slaughter house. They do everything in their power to “stop animal cruelty”, as they put it. This story, “Carnal Knowledge” revolves around this dilemma. It’s a story of a man whose perspective on meat changes throughout the story after he meets Alena Jorgensen, a Vegan.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The Carnivore’s Dilemma”, an essay by Nicolette Hanh Niman, incorporates rhetorical elements, such as logos, ethos, and rhetorical questions, in an attempt to convince the audience that meat itself is not the root of global warming. Written from a rancher’s point of view, the essay relies on studies and logic to prove itself. Niman starts out with a short acknowledgement that the meat industry has a hand in the increasingly noticeable global climate change. She then quickly changes gears, stating that the studies that show the meat industry is a major player in global warming only take the prevailing methods of producing meat into account and spews facts that show the flip side of the food industry.…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Omnivore Diet Benefits

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Industrial farmers appear to be more concerned with massive profit margins, than they do with producing quality food in providing meat and vegetables: “The cruelty of the factory farms—the cages are small, the slaughter is violent” (Foer 67). Spiritually, I cannot tolerate the brutal methods of animal treatment, which industrial ranchers and meat producers tend to follow in the 21st century. Therefore, it is important to follow an ethical version of the Standard American Diet, which provide the healthiest and most ethical production of food for human health. I believe that all living things should be treated with respect and reverence for what they provide, which sustains my own life through the sacrifice of their own. These are important aspects of the omnivore diet, which can be sustainable in the modern world. I follow a code of ethics in terms of how animals should be processed for consumption. The problem with eating meat is not necessarily eating the meat itself; it is respecting that another life form has given me life. This is why I support organically produced foods that will be processed through ethical farming methods within the general framework of the Standard American…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just before the turn of the millennia, Laura Fraser, who had been a vegetarian for 15 years, decided to return to eating meat. In her essay, Why I Stopped Being a Vegetarian, she details her original convictions of the lifestyle and her new reasoning against continuing vegetarianism as a defense against those who endorse vegetarianism. She sets past actions and beliefs as her opposition, and then critiques her previous thoughts and behaviors. Rather than discrediting herself through this act, she actually boosts her current ethos and logos. This complex strategy effectively works to convince the audience because in essence Fraser debates her opposition and convinces them as to why the shift away from vegetarianism…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to viewpoints there will always be an opposing side. You must develop your strongly focused opinion with examples and/or reasons. In order for a reader to accept your side you must use clear, powerful, and direct language to really capture them. Express your opinion clearly, and then base it on factual, researched or first-hand information. Hard facts and first-hand experience are so convincing to readers. The way to convince your audience to accept your opinion is through the combination of ethos, logos, and pathos appeals. These appeals are required for successfully appealing to the average reader and getting your point across in the most effective way possible. The vegetarianism lifestyle can be adopted for many different reasons. Aside from the main decision of preventing the cruel treatment of animals, many people choose this lifestyle for health reasons. Winston Craig supports this reasoning in his essay “Plant-Based Diets Provide Many Health Benefits,” while Ben Kim argues that this kind of diet causes many health problems in “A Strict Vegetarian Diet Is Unhealthy for Most People.” Their opinions, supported by facts, makes each case convincing.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trust is one of the most essential feeling that anyone would want in themselves, and in other. Trust gives us the confident to support one’s point of view, and believes. There is no doubt that we can perfectly relate this to Michael Pollan’s essay “An Animal Place”. Pollan addresses the animal rightist claim that animals should be giving more rights, while other think that animals do disserve to have right since they are less intelligent than us humans. Pollan’s main objective is not to persuade his audience to stop eating meat, but rather to study the ethics of eating animals and to find out the way meat is processed by building a sense of trust with his audience. He effectively abutment his main opinion about the problem in the industrialized…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays