Traditionally the surrogate mother is usually a close relative who is looked after and taken care of and there is no financial obligation involved. However with the times changing and relatives not readily available to suffer the discomfort and pain involved, the services of surrogate mothers have assumed pecuniary overtones. The recent case of a poor woman advertising the services of her womb, in return for Rs. 50,000, has raised the question of ethics involved.
Nirmala, a 30 year old woman from Chandigarh planned to ‘rent out her womb’ and the reports highlighted by the media were received with dismay. Her unconventional plans to raise money for the treatment of her husband raised many eyebrows and the legal, social and ethical ramifications of the latest technologies being introduced were questioned.
The fact that surrogate motherhood was as old as the Mahabharata and Bible, when surrogate mothers got impregnated through sexual intercourse, is being overlooked. The problem of infertility is a serious one in our society and the social stigma involved include abandoning wives. The economic pressures that entail should indeed find welcome support through IVF.
The IVF method comprises artificial insemination involving the husband’s or denors sperm and the ova from the wife or surrogate mother is used for fertilization. The resulting embryos are then implanted in the woman’s or surrogate mother’s womb. The techniques today have in-vitro fertilization being used to achieve pregnancy in a petri dish.
Since the birth of the first test tube baby in 1978 there have been demands for promulgation of laws to solve the disputes which were likely to crop up as derivatives of modern