Sustainable Food Production
Sustainable Food Production and Consumption
Agenda for Action
Current methods of food production and consumption are imposing a severe burden on the environment and the constituent natural resources. New production and processing methods driven by biotechnology (genetically modified organisms (GMOs), hormones and other growth promoters) affect food safety. Are alternative more sustainable patterns of food production and consumption feasible? The paper examines some consumer initiatives in Asia and in the UK to examine how the consumer as a ‘market force’ can proactively influence the food industry, thereby making sustainable practices the norm rather than the exception. It also looks at the significance of empowering women, as consumers, with awareness and education on food safety, nutrition and its dependence on sustainable practices to exert a ‘pull’ on the market. Finally the paper discusses a multi-pronged approach involving, besides consumer pressure, policy changes, regulatory efforts and economic instruments to steer food production and consumption in a more sustainable direction.
RADHA GOPALAN orld politics and governance is increasingly being challenged by one major issue, the capacity to provide safe and adequate food to its population – food security. A number of international development institutions and organisations are presently engaged in a debate on global food prospects for the next 10-15 years which is fast being relegated to a numbers game. Food supply and demand projections are being made with arguments being offered about food surpluses and falling prices on one side and food scarcity and hunger on the other. Such projections and contrasting arguments have tremendous implications on the future survival of this planet. A requirement of ensuring food security is to first understand the food needs, and then ensuring that, in answering these needs, the integrity of natural ecosystems is not compromised so that food can be made available in a
Agenda for Action
Current methods of food production and consumption are imposing a severe burden on the environment and the constituent natural resources. New production and processing methods driven by biotechnology (genetically modified organisms (GMOs), hormones and other growth promoters) affect food safety. Are alternative more sustainable patterns of food production and consumption feasible? The paper examines some consumer initiatives in Asia and in the UK to examine how the consumer as a ‘market force’ can proactively influence the food industry, thereby making sustainable practices the norm rather than the exception. It also looks at the significance of empowering women, as consumers, with awareness and education on food safety, nutrition and its dependence on sustainable practices to exert a ‘pull’ on the market. Finally the paper discusses a multi-pronged approach involving, besides consumer pressure, policy changes, regulatory efforts and economic instruments to steer food production and consumption in a more sustainable direction.
RADHA GOPALAN orld politics and governance is increasingly being challenged by one major issue, the capacity to provide safe and adequate food to its population – food security. A number of international development institutions and organisations are presently engaged in a debate on global food prospects for the next 10-15 years which is fast being relegated to a numbers game. Food supply and demand projections are being made with arguments being offered about food surpluses and falling prices on one side and food scarcity and hunger on the other. Such projections and contrasting arguments have tremendous implications on the future survival of this planet. A requirement of ensuring food security is to first understand the food needs, and then ensuring that, in answering these needs, the integrity of natural ecosystems is not compromised so that food can be made available in a
References: Alvares, Claude (ed) (1996): The Organic Farming Sourcebook, The Other India Press in association with Third World Network, Malaysia. Brown, L R (1996): Tough Choices, Worldwatch Environmental Alert Series, W W Norton, New York. Capra, F (1982): The Turning Point: Science Society and the Rising Culture, Flamingo, London. Hannis, M (1998): ‘The Myth of Green Consumerism: Consumption, Community and Free Markets’, Lancaster University MAVE Programme, http://www.lancs.ac.uk/users/ philosophy/mave/mh_2.htm. Hare, J (1998): Crisis in Agriculture Cultivating Disaster: US Farm Policy Fiasco’, Multinational Monitor, July-August, Vol 10, Nos 7 and 8. Meadows, D H et al (1972): The Limits to Growth, Pan Books, London. Oxfam (1999): ‘Genetically Modified Crops World Trade and Food Security’, November (http:// www.oxfam.org.uk). UNDP: Human Development Report 1998, Oxford University Press, New York. von Weizscker, E, A B Lovins and L H Lovins (1997): ‘Factor Four: Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource Use’, Earthscan, London. Economic and Political Weekly April 14, 2001 1225