What is pragmatics?
The study of pragmatics explores the ability of language users to match utterances with contexts in which they are appropriate; in Stalnaker 's words, pragmatics is "the study of linguistic acts and the contexts in which they are performed" (1972, p. 383). The teaching of pragmatics aims to facilitate the learners ' ability to find socially appropriate language for the situations they encounter. Within second language studies and teaching, pragmatics encompasses speech acts, conversational structure, conversational implicature, conversational management, discourse organization, and sociolinguistic aspects of language use, such as choice of address forms. These areas of language and language use have not traditionally been addressed in language teaching curricula, leading one of our students to ask if we could teach him "the secret rules of English." Pragmatic rules for language use are often subconscious, and even native speakers are often unaware of pragmatic rules until they are broken (and feelings are hurt, offense is taken, or things
References: Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bouton, L. F. (1988). A cross-cultural study of ability to interpret implicatures in English. World Englishes, 17, pp. 183-196. Kasper, G. (1997a). Can pragmatic competence be taught? NFLRC Network #6, University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. [http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/] Kasper, G Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, pp. 81-104. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, pp. 149-169. Rose, K., & G. Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stalnaker, R Wolfson, N. (1988). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House. Kasper, G. (1997b). The role of pragmatics in language teacher education. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. S. Hartford, (Eds.) Beyond methods: Components of language teacher education (pp. 113-136). New York: McGraw Hill. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Hartford, B. A. S., Mahan-Taylor, R., Morgan, M. J., & Reynolds, D. W. Reynolds, D. W. (1991). Developing pragmatic competence: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal, 45, pp. 4-15. Boxer, D. (1993). Complaints as positive strategies: What the learner needs to know. TESOL Quarterly, 27, pp. 277-299. Boxer, D., & Pickering, L Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1991). Teaching speech act behavior to nonnative speakers. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd edition, pp. 154-190). New York: Newbury House. Holmes, J., & Brown, D Scotton, C. M., & Bernsten, J. (1988). Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics, 9, pp. 213-243. Thomas, J Williams, M. (1988). Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics, 9, pp. 45-58. Yoshida, K., Kamiya, M., Kondo, S., & Tokiwa, R