Preview

Teaching Pragmatics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teaching Pragmatics
Teaching Pragmatics explores the teaching of pragmatics through lessons and activities created by teachers of English as a second and foreign language. This book is written for teachers by teachers. Our teacher-contributors teach in seven different countries and are both native-speakers and nonnative speakers of English. Activities reflect ESL and EFL classroom settings. The chapters included here allow teachers to see how other teachers approach the teaching of pragmatics and to appreciate the diversity and creativity of their endeavors. Taken together, the activities constitute a spectrum of possibilities for teaching pragmatics. Each submission provides novel insight into the ESL/EFL classroom and demonstrates that there is no single approach to the teaching of pragmatics. The variety of approaches means that pragmatics can be integrated easily into any classroom, whether traditional or communicative.
What is pragmatics?
The study of pragmatics explores the ability of language users to match utterances with contexts in which they are appropriate; in Stalnaker 's words, pragmatics is "the study of linguistic acts and the contexts in which they are performed" (1972, p. 383). The teaching of pragmatics aims to facilitate the learners ' ability to find socially appropriate language for the situations they encounter. Within second language studies and teaching, pragmatics encompasses speech acts, conversational structure, conversational implicature, conversational management, discourse organization, and sociolinguistic aspects of language use, such as choice of address forms. These areas of language and language use have not traditionally been addressed in language teaching curricula, leading one of our students to ask if we could teach him "the secret rules of English." Pragmatic rules for language use are often subconscious, and even native speakers are often unaware of pragmatic rules until they are broken (and feelings are hurt, offense is taken, or things



References: Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bouton, L. F. (1988). A cross-cultural study of ability to interpret implicatures in English. World Englishes, 17, pp. 183-196. Kasper, G. (1997a). Can pragmatic competence be taught? NFLRC Network #6, University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. [http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/] Kasper, G Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, pp. 81-104. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, pp. 149-169. Rose, K., & G. Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stalnaker, R Wolfson, N. (1988). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House. Kasper, G. (1997b). The role of pragmatics in language teacher education. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. S. Hartford, (Eds.) Beyond methods: Components of language teacher education (pp. 113-136). New York: McGraw Hill. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Hartford, B. A. S., Mahan-Taylor, R., Morgan, M. J., & Reynolds, D. W. Reynolds, D. W. (1991). Developing pragmatic competence: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal, 45, pp. 4-15. Boxer, D. (1993). Complaints as positive strategies: What the learner needs to know. TESOL Quarterly, 27, pp. 277-299. Boxer, D., & Pickering, L Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1991). Teaching speech act behavior to nonnative speakers. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd edition, pp. 154-190). New York: Newbury House. Holmes, J., & Brown, D Scotton, C. M., & Bernsten, J. (1988). Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics, 9, pp. 213-243. Thomas, J Williams, M. (1988). Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics, 9, pp. 45-58. Yoshida, K., Kamiya, M., Kondo, S., & Tokiwa, R

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    DTTLS Assignments

    • 5208 Words
    • 149 Pages

    Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and spoken language. "Applied Linguistics, 16" (2), 141-158…

    • 5208 Words
    • 149 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    -Pragmatics= how we use lang to convey our intended meaning within a particular social context and how we figure out others' intended meanings…

    • 10440 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although McDonald’s and Burger King are the two largest fast food restaurants in the world, McDonald’s service and quality far exceeds Burger King’s. This would be considered important information to people who consume food or require services at McDonald's or Burger King, whether on a regular basis or not so constantly. This information could also be useful to employees who are new to the companies and to perspective investors or buyers.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Bruthiaux, Paul et al. 2005. Directions in Applied Linguistics: Essay in honor of Robert B. Kaplan. Great Britain: Cromwell Press Ltd.…

    • 2535 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    language pragmatics whose mission is to scrutinize how non 2native speakers do things with words with L 2. This paper reported that 4 NPT 2related aspects have been heavily document 2 ed in the current literature :1 ) L 1 negative pragmatic transfers at the speech2act level;2 ) the distinction between negative pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic transfers ;3 ) conditions of negative pragmatic transfers ; and 4) native speakerz] attitudes towards L 1 negative pragmat 2 s ic transfers . Consequently , issues for future studies are also raised. Key words: negative pragmatic transfer ; interlanguage pragmatics ; speech acts [ �d �1 �� ]H09,� ,� [�� �p�J �� �2 ]A ,� ,� ,� [�� �� �T �� ]100126597 (2002 ) 0120034212 �� ��…

    • 7392 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Semantics vs. Pragmatics

    • 2050 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Pragmatics is a subfield of linguistics which studies the ways in which context contributes to meaning. It encompasses speech act theory, conversational implicature talk in interaction and other approaches to language behavior in philosophy,…

    • 2050 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    guidance and detailed advice throughout the development of this thesis. I remain greatly indebted to…

    • 46059 Words
    • 185 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pragmatic Acquisition

    • 4086 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Every body experiences pragmatics acquisition since he/she is a child. In the acquisition of pragmatics children are faced with learning diverse skills. They need to learn amongst other things to take the listeners perspective into account and choose the correct pragmatic function they want to convey. There has been considerable work on the acquisition of pragmatics.…

    • 4086 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Politeness

    • 5606 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Lakoff, R. T. (2004). Language and Womenʹs Place. Rev. and expanded ed. New York; Oxford:…

    • 5606 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on Speaking. Sydney: Sydney National Centre for english Language Teaching and Research.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At present it has become quite obvious that a good amount of comprehension must be ascribed not to the rules of language, but to our ability to infer what the speaker’s intentions are in saying what he says. Linguists try to explain this in terms of theories known as pragmatics, which is the study of linguistic acts and the contexts in which they are performed.…

    • 10903 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Being polite is not as easy as people think about politeness. People tend to think politeness as a simply thing like saying thank you and please in appropriate place (Holmes, 2001). For instance, children are taught to say please for being polite when they make a request. But the word please for adults can be more than just being polite, sometimes they use please to give more power or peremptory in directive. When we learn politeness, we not only have to understand about the language but also the social and values of the community.…

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Natural Approach

    • 4921 Words
    • 20 Pages

    1. Jack C. Richards, Theodore Stephen Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press : ( 178 – 190)…

    • 4921 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The new curriculum ignored pragmatics, phonology, and real syntax. In the new curriculum, communication with world based on our culture means ignoring pragmatics in western culture. However, knowledge of vocabulary cannot be restricted to its meaning. Learners need to know the correct pronunciation, parts of speech, and the proper contexts to use vocabularies.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Computer Misuse Act

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pragmatic competence (the ability to use language effectively in order to achieve a specific purpose and to understand language in context) can be divided into two parts---pragma-linguistic competence and sociopragmatic competence. When talking about pragma-linguistic competence, it not only includes the competence of using grammar rules to make sentences correctly, but also the competence of using the language to communicate successfully in a certain situation, while sociopragmatic competence means to communicate properly according to the social rules of a language. Poor pragmatic competence will cause pragmatic failure.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays