Preview

Teenage Murderers

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teenage Murderers
Teenage Murderers
By: H.Mook Monroe
Section One
My topic is the teenage murderers. Teenagers are capable of committing serious crimes. The question is after they commit a serious crime what should happen to them.
The article “Many Kids called Unfit Adult Trial,” states that teenagers are emotionally & intellectually incompetent to stand trial. Some important ideas from this article are that most teens on trial are equal to mentally ill adults ; thousands of teens were tried when they shouldn’t have been, an teens can’t fully grasp consequences.
The article “Supreme Court to rule on Executing Young Killers,” asks should young teenage killers be executed? Some important ideas from this article are that he
(Robert Acuna) is the latest person to enter death row for a crime committed before age eighteen. The Supreme Court agreed to consider the constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty, and he was laughing at the wrong place and the wrong time.
Another article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” is saying that kids who do these crimes are immature and not thinking their reactions because it says Brazil’s immaturity was evident throughout the trial through the faces he gave. He wasn’t worried “Child is not a man.”

Section Two
This research paper has presented the facts about teenage murderers. Underlying all these facts is one important and controversial question: Should a teenager who commits murder be tried as an adult or as a teenager? In my opinion it depends on how it happen, if it was on accident or on purpose because it could’ve been out of self-defense. The court should not look at the case as if it was an adult instead they should look at them as individual cases.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority advances their argument by listing some of the mental differences between adults and juveniles such as: “susceptibility to immature behavior”, lack of control over their environment and the peers that come with it, the ability to undergo a character change. These factors were enough for the Court to find the age group a suspect class and hold that they have diminished culpability, at least to an extent that the death penalty becomes an excessive…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles should be tried as adults depending on the level of the crime. Based on the information in , “On Punishment and Teen Killers ”, Jennifer Jenkins, explains how a teenager killed her younger sister ,which was pregnant with her first child, and her husband If the juvenile knew what they were doing they should be tried as an adult. Juveniles that commit huge crimes should face adult sentencing since they are responsible.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jazmyne Garcia Shywanda Royal English 12b 04/6/16 Juveniles deserve life sentencing It is more likely for teenagers to commit heinous crimes when they have been emotionally and physically abused. Teenagers who suffer from a mental illness are more likely to commit recidivism than an adult that has random encounters with the law. Prosecutors who try juveniles as adults believe that a crime is a crime, even if the person who committed it was a young adult.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults when they commit serious crimes, because the adult prison is too violent with juveniles not mature and fully mentally developed, and children in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ten year old boy murders his family. Does he get out when he turns eighteen, because he knows not what he did? Or does he spend the rest of his life in prison? Sometimes teenagers are tried for crimes as adults and face equal penalties that are subject to adults. This is a controversial issue among americans. There are two groups of people. Those who believe that teenagers under the age of eighteen who commit serious crimes should be held responsible as adults for their actions. Courts are said to be too lenient and the young juveniles are evolving into violent youth criminals; And there are those who suggest that teenagers are less likely to understand the consequences of their actions and more likely to become productive citizens if the criminal justice system continues to treat eighteen year olds as juveniles. Juvenile death penalties and life sentences without parole have increased at an estimated rate of three times higher today than fifteen years ago. The youth are still growing to become fully developed, like an adult. There are many cases where tough decisions have to be made and choices must be made by officials. In my opinion all youths at the age of eighteen or younger should be tried as juveniles and all our juvenile courts need to focus more on rehabilitation for the lost of youth to criminal acts. Age should be a factor, not a determinant on how these youths should be tried.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will view both sides to whether children should be tried as adults. The rate of murders by juveniles and children has skyrocketed across the country. There are many people who feel that children should be tried as adults due to the popular saying “If you do the crime, you must do the time”. According to many sources it is believed that it will make them understand the consequences of their actions and deter them from committing any further crimes.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Justice: Should children be tried as adults? Are youth capable of fully understanding the consequences that their actions may cause or are they mentally incapable of processing that information? Juveniles commit crimes just like adults. Sometimes the crimes they commit are heinous, but does that mean they are no longer a child? I believe there may be special cases when a youth should be tried as an adult, but in most cases, they need to be processed through the juvenile justice system.…

    • 3987 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serial Killers

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry Louis Wallace is a serial killer who killed at least 10 women in the Charlotte, North Carolina area. He is also known as the Taco Bell Strangler because a lot of his victims worked with him at Taco Bell. Wallace’s crimes did not start with murders. He had several burglary charges in Seattle, Washington. He also began to use several drugs including crack cocaine while he was in the Navy. In 1990, Wallace committed his first murder in his hometown of Barnwell, South Carolina. His first victims name was Tashonda Bethea and he dumped her body in a lake, not to be found until weeks later. He was questioned about this murder but was never formally charged with anything relating to it. In 1992, Wallace murdered two people, Sharon Nance and Caroline Love. He has four victims in 1993, Shawna Hawk, Audrey Spain, Valencia Jumper and Michelle Stinson. All of those women were raped and then strangled by Wallace. In February of 1994, Wallace was arrested for shoplifting but the police did not make a connection between him and the murders. Later that month he strangled Vanessa Mack in her apartment. On March 8, 1994, Wallace took two more lives, Betty Baucom and Brandi Henderson. The police started to crack down and look for the killer but Wallace still managed to murder one more, Deborah Slaughter by stabbing her around 38 times in the stomach and chest. Her body was found on March 12, 1994 and Wallace was finally arrested on March 13th. He confesses to murdering 10 women in Charlotte and described how he raped, robbed and killed all of the women. Henry Louis Wallace was charged for nine of the murders and is currently on death row in the state of North Carolina with nine death sentences. There is no execution date set yet and he is being held at Central Prison in Raleigh, North Carolina.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question is, should teens who murder be tried as adults? I would have to say yes. If one can understand what murder is, he or she should also understand that it’s wrong. Everyday a grown person or a teenager is being arrested for murder. If one is big enough to do the crime, than he or she can do the time. It’s not about being old enough to understand because at the age of 14 or 15 years old one has learned the difference in right and wrong; therefore, one knows the action is wrong and should take the consequences for the wrong they committed just like any other person should. It wouldn’t be fair if say a 30 year old man gets arrested for rape and takes it on upon himself to stab his victim to death and gets life in prison, but then a 15 year old kid who knows what he is doing as well gets arrested for the same crime and gets away with it. It wouldn’t be fair because, not only did that 15 year old get away with murder because of his age, but that family has to sit there in grief and pain knowing that this 15 year old just got away with murder; this kid could also thinking its ok to do it again because I’m just a kid, but that 15 year old kid is about to go attack another person.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice has been a prominent controversy in present day society. We can observe how the majority of crimes committed are being perpetrated by adolescents. The disputation arises on whether the Supreme Court justice should abolish mandatory life in prison for pubescents who commit the immorality of murder or authorize the punishment with parole. Although many can challenge this contrary issue, I concur with ideology of the Supreme Court ruling that juveniles who engage in murder could not be sentenced to life in prison due to the protection the 8th amendment granting defense from cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Children Who Kill

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Juvenile justice system has changed over the years. Before the first establishment of this system, courts and judges treated juveniles as adults and sometimes received the same punishment as adults. For many years, there were debates on if children before the age of 21 were responsible for their actions seeing as they aren’t fully capable of understanding their actions. This murder of Jamie Bulger created an uproar all over the world on children at such a young age know right from wrong and also violence. Backgrounds, and family upbringing and violence in the media had played a major role in this murder case.…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As more minors are committing violent crimes, the question of whether they should be tried as adults is on the rise. Children as young as 13 or 14 are committing violent crimes such as murder, rape, and armed robbery. Some of these children are being tried as adults while others are being tried as juveniles and receiving milder punishments. A juvenile offender may receive a few years in a juvenile detention facility and possibly probation following his release at age eighteen. An adult committing the same violent crime will receive a much harsher penalty, often years in jail, possibly a life sentence, with little or no chance of parole. The only difference between the two offenders is the age at which they committed the crime. Juveniles over the age of fourteen should be tried as adults when accused of violent crimes. Forty-one states currently have laws that make it easier to try a juvenile that has committed a violent crime and is over the age of 14 as an adult. At age fourteen the average person is mentally mature enough to understand the consequences associated with committing a crime. A juvenile offender should be tried according to his crime. If they have committed a juvenile crime, then juvenile punishment is fitting. However, if they have committed an adult crime, or violent crime, a harsher punishment is needed. A teenager will not be taught anything or learn to take responsibility for their actions, if they are treated with special care and consideration when acting as an adult. A fourteen year old has the mental capacity to determine right from wrong, even when it comes to committing violent crimes. In my opinion an adult crime deserves an adult punishment, even when the offender is a juvenile.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mary Elliott, I agree that the punishment must fit the crime regardless of the age but there are other things to consider such as giving the death penalty or life without parole for the juvenile who has committed a violent murder intentionally. Mental Health America feels that juvenile offenders should not be given the death penalty or life without parole because these sentences are inconsistent with the purposes that normally guide sentencing such as deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, or rehabilitation (Position statement 58, 2017).…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays