A difficult problem is happen when teenagers are driving. Driving age should not be lowered because teenagers are irresponsible when they are driving. Teenagers do not worry about the risk that they could suffer while they do no follow the law. Therefore, if driving age is lowered, teenagers could be expose a danger situations. Even though some believe that driving age should be lowered, I believe that it should not be lowered for three reasons. My first reason that I am an opponent of driving age should be lowered is teenagers are irresponsible. Teenagers do not follow the laws when they are driving. For example, my cousin is 16 years old, and she never makes the stop correctly on each intersection. In contrast, my brother is 20 years old, and he always pays attention on every traffic signal. Also, teenagers do not drive at the correct speed limit. They like to be the first car on the street, so they do not worry about the speed limit on the road. All in all, teenagers are irresponsible when they are driving. Another reason why I am against is teenagers are inattentive. Teenagers do not pay attention on the traffic signals because they have another things to do while they are driving. For instance, my youngest friend had an accident last year because he passed the red light on while he was texting with his girlfriend. In addition, when teenagers are driving under the influence of alcohol, they do not care about the laws. For example, my friend Karla was driving under the influence of alcohol, and she had a serious accident that puts her in a comma for 15 months. Clearly, when teenagers are inattentive they will cause dangers accidents. Opponents maintain that driving age should be lowered. They say that teenagers at 14 years old are responsible, and they do not get distracted easily. However, I believe that driving age should not be lowered because they get distracted easily. For instances, if a teenager is driving with her or his
A difficult problem is happen when teenagers are driving. Driving age should not be lowered because teenagers are irresponsible when they are driving. Teenagers do not worry about the risk that they could suffer while they do no follow the law. Therefore, if driving age is lowered, teenagers could be expose a danger situations. Even though some believe that driving age should be lowered, I believe that it should not be lowered for three reasons. My first reason that I am an opponent of driving age should be lowered is teenagers are irresponsible. Teenagers do not follow the laws when they are driving. For example, my cousin is 16 years old, and she never makes the stop correctly on each intersection. In contrast, my brother is 20 years old, and he always pays attention on every traffic signal. Also, teenagers do not drive at the correct speed limit. They like to be the first car on the street, so they do not worry about the speed limit on the road. All in all, teenagers are irresponsible when they are driving. Another reason why I am against is teenagers are inattentive. Teenagers do not pay attention on the traffic signals because they have another things to do while they are driving. For instance, my youngest friend had an accident last year because he passed the red light on while he was texting with his girlfriend. In addition, when teenagers are driving under the influence of alcohol, they do not care about the laws. For example, my friend Karla was driving under the influence of alcohol, and she had a serious accident that puts her in a comma for 15 months. Clearly, when teenagers are inattentive they will cause dangers accidents. Opponents maintain that driving age should be lowered. They say that teenagers at 14 years old are responsible, and they do not get distracted easily. However, I believe that driving age should not be lowered because they get distracted easily. For instances, if a teenager is driving with her or his