Preview

Tenets Of Unified Land Operations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
651 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tenets Of Unified Land Operations
Adapting the consideration of the factors resulting in the loss of the Roman army to practical terms provides a template for commanders to use when planning future operations. These lessons fall under several aspects of current United States Army Unified Land Operations doctrine, namely the Tenets of Unified Land Operations (ULO), Warfighting Functions, and Mutual Support.
The first tenet of ULO is flexibility. Hannibal’s on the spot decision to establish a hasty ambush demonstrates the importance of allowing leaders the ability to utilize creative thinking and adapt to changing conditions or enemy actions. This flexibility can provide initiative that can weigh heavily in the results of a skirmish, battle, campaign, or war. The importance
…show more content…
Prior to the battle, Hannibal established a decoy encampment to lure in the Roman army. This act demonstrates a component of Mission Command: Conduct military deception. The ability to understand the enemy force’s decision making process and Warfighting Functions allows a commander to setup a scenario that would appear reasonable to the enemy commander. This deception should be realistic enough that the enemy commander believes in the deception because it falls in line with their understanding of the friendly commander’s capabilities, doctrine, and behavior. Hannibal’s ability to maneuver and employ direct fires displays precedence for Movement and Maneuver Warfighting Function. Having a greater number of forces nor having a superiorly equipped force equate to a guaranteed victory. A commander must understand the best method for maneuver elements into contact with enemy forces and those troops must be trained, willing, and able to effectively engage the enemy in combat. Furthermore, as displayed by the Roman army, the proper implementation of reconnaissance and surveillance assets is critical to providing a commander with immediate information that is critical to their decision making process. While the use of scouts would have provided Consul Gaius-Flaminius warning of Hannibal’s ambush, the use of the Intelligence Warfighting Function would have provided specific information that answered his intelligence requirements. Commanders must establish a method for identifying intelligence gaps and support the means to complete their analytical picture of the battlefield, their enemies, and additional factors that influence the outcome of an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    On 9 July 1943, the Allied Forces initiated the invasion of Sicily, or “Operation Husky”. This invasion was the largest amphibious operation conducted during World War II and utilized over 2,590 vessels and involved approximately a half million soldiers, sailors, and airmen. While this invasion was a victory for the Allies and provided them with a launch pad for its invasion of Italy, senior leaders made many mistakes in their planning, execution, decision making, and coordination. As a result, analysis of this operation provides excellent lessons learned that are still relevant today for future joint commanders and staff. Lastly, of the six joint functions integrated into joint or combined operations, this paper focuses on evaluating, at the…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It ensured that everyone in the battalion had an understanding of his intent. This allowed him to be able to lead his subordinated during the…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus Film Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie Spartacus the deployment of the Roman army is very interesting. In the battle scene you see a deployment of a legion in a quincunx formation (checker board pattern) this shows the discipline and organization of the Roman army. As the Roman army comes closer to Spartacus' slave army the front legion starts to form a solid front line and they would continue moving forward. As the front group is lining up you can see the back legionaries coming together into one group. As an opponent seeing this it can be quiet intimating.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s operating environment, focusing on modularity with forces deployed across the globe, it is vital for Commanders to study, understand and apply Mission Command principles. During the Revolutionary War, the British had forces spread from New York to Charleston and communications were extremely slow. Like today, this type of environment would have benefited from the use of Mission Command principles such as shared understanding, clear intent, disciplined initiative and accepting prudent risk. Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis, an otherwise successful military leader throughout the war, failed to demonstrate these principles in the lead-up to and during the Battle of Yorktown. His failures from April 25 to October 19, 1781, would…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miskel's Farm

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The Battle at Miskel’s Farm placed the Confederate scout forces of John Singleton Mosbys’ Partisan Rangers against the Union forces of Major Charles F. Tagert on 31 March 1863, on a small farm in Loudon County, Virginia in a battle that would display the ferocious confidence and unwavering tenacity of Captain John Singleton Mosby who was never captured by the Union forces. This battle, won by Mosbys’ Rangers, highlights the Principles of Offense, Unity of Command, Security, and Surprise, and the Tenents of Initiative and Agility. Additionally present were the violations of the Battlefield Operating System of Intelligence and Command and Control. This victory cemented Captain John Mosby’s reliability as a confident and credible leader for the Confederates during the Civil War.…

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Eisenhower’s speech, he stated, “I have full confidence in your courage, devotion, and duty and skill in battle.” This quote contrasts the difficulty…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, when going into a war, preparation was key for different military units. During his interview, Tony Arellano explained,…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In bygone days, commanders were taught that when in doubt, they should march their troops towards the sound of gunfire. I intend to march my troops towards the sound of gunfire.[->0]”…

    • 5242 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Have you ever thought about how different the Americans and Romans are? They have different lifestyles, cultures, traditions, and their military is different too. Even though they are different, they are also the same. Their military is different and the same because of the way they train soldiers, their ranks, and their uniforms.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before this war, the Roman army was used to fighting the likes of Celtic barbarians or the people of Italy during the interior Italian civil war, but going against Hannibal, who was a master of military tactics, was a different matter. During the battle of Trebia, for example, Hannibal knew the strengths of the forces at his disposal and the military history of previous Carthaginian encounters with Rome, and could therefore predict the movement of his enemies. Throughout these battles Hannibal was successful in preventing two roman tactics; the first being operating on interior lines which involved the deployment of infantry lines and resources in an area that could be easily accessed. It is often used to prevent the opponent from being able to deploy a similar tactic and hold them to a point where re-enforcing the front line becomes evermore difficult. This tactic was very popular among Roman generals and for centuries to come would it be used in…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without being prepared for what they will face, especially in the face of irregular threats, lives and intelligence will be lost, effective orders cannot be written and the war cannot be…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Hannibal Is To Blame

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We went according to our usual formation, our light infantry toward the front, our heavy infantry behind the light infantry, and putting light and heavy cavalry on back wings. This formation failed us. Our usual tactic of placing a large amount of men on the field to overwhelm our enemy has failed as well. It is possible that Hannibal knew how we set up our battles and such, and he was able to devise a plan to outsmart us since this is the only way we were taught to set up and…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Strategic Thinking

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Of all the Athenian leaders during the time of the Sicily invasion, Nicias possessed the clearest vision and a demonstrated ability to think strategically. He provided a comprehensive interpretation of the problems the Athenians might face. He showed a strategic understanding of the volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguous nature of the expedition. Nicias applied critical thinking, evaluated the information that the Egestaeans presented, developed valid assumptions and inferences from Alcibiades’ speech, clarified his concern, and presented his point of view that detailed the implications of the expedition. Once the Athenians made the decision to invade Sicily, Nicias presented a concise strategy detailing the ends, ways, and means that mitigated the risks for possible success. Although the Athenians did not adopt his strategy as a whole, due to internal factors and competing interest, his strategy is a classic example of applying strategic thinking to deal with complex problems.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examples of perfectly planned and executed battles are few and far between in U.S. history. However, the Cabanatuan Prison Raid in the Philippines still serves today as close to an ideal illustration of planning, coordination, and effective command. LTC Henry Mucci of the U.S. Army’s 6th Ranger Battalion decisively adhered to the principles of mission command. He built a cohesive team through mutual trust, created a shared understanding, and took prudent risk to succeed. The raid was conducted at a Japanese-run Prisoner of War (POW) camp beside the small town of Pangatian; it is now more commonly referenced by its proximity the larger Cabanatuan city, in central Luzon.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays