Term Paper
Introduction to social work
Compare, contrast and critically evaluate Crisis Intervention and Task-Centred Practice. Debate what you see as their effectiveness by outlining potential advantages and disadvantages and with reference to research regarding their effectiveness.
The British Association of Social Workers (BASW) Code of Ethics (2002:1) states that;
"The social work profession promotes social change, problem solving in human relationships and the empowerment and liberation of people to enhance well-being. Utilising theories of human behaviour and social systems, social work intervenes at the points where people interact with their environment."
In order to promote such social change and provide high quality professional practice, social workers utilise various theoretical frameworks and apply them appropriately in order to help service users in the best way they can. The intention of this essay is to discus the key features of the task-centred practice and crisis intervention approaches, both of which are widely used methods of social work practice. With reference to research, the effectiveness and limitations of these approaches will be analyzed by outlining potential advantages and disadvantages, and by demonstrating that although these approaches have different origins, they do have some common features.
McColgan (2009:60) states that task-centred practice is;
"...a popular method of intervention in social work practice. It does not depend on any complex theory, is down to earth, makes sense and is easy to understand in its application."
Coulshed & Orme (2006:156) believe that the task-centred approach, also known as "brief therapy, short term or contract work" is probably one of the most researched and commonly used approaches to problem solving in social work practice.
Task-centred practice was developed out of research into effective social work practice by Reid and Shyne in 1969, who found that planned, short term intervention, was
Compare, contrast and critically evaluate Crisis Intervention and Task-Centred Practice. Debate what you see as their effectiveness by outlining potential advantages and disadvantages and with reference to research regarding their effectiveness.
The British Association of Social Workers (BASW) Code of Ethics (2002:1) states that;
"The social work profession promotes social change, problem solving in human relationships and the empowerment and liberation of people to enhance well-being. Utilising theories of human behaviour and social systems, social work intervenes at the points where people interact with their environment."
In order to promote such social change and provide high quality professional practice, social workers utilise various theoretical frameworks and apply them appropriately in order to help service users in the best way they can. The intention of this essay is to discus the key features of the task-centred practice and crisis intervention approaches, both of which are widely used methods of social work practice. With reference to research, the effectiveness and limitations of these approaches will be analyzed by outlining potential advantages and disadvantages, and by demonstrating that although these approaches have different origins, they do have some common features.
McColgan (2009:60) states that task-centred practice is;
"...a popular method of intervention in social work practice. It does not depend on any complex theory, is down to earth, makes sense and is easy to understand in its application."
Coulshed & Orme (2006:156) believe that the task-centred approach, also known as "brief therapy, short term or contract work" is probably one of the most researched and commonly used approaches to problem solving in social work practice.
Task-centred practice was developed out of research into effective social work practice by Reid and Shyne in 1969, who found that planned, short term intervention, was
References: * Abrams, D & Hogg, M. (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. * Brown, C. (2006). Social psychology. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. * Burr, V. (2002). The person in social psychology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press Ltd. * Gross, R. (1992). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour second edition. London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton Educational. * Higgins, E. (1987) Self-Discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. * Higgins, E. (1999). When do self-discrepancies have specific relations to emotions? The second-generation question of Tangney, Niedenthal, Covert, and Barlow (1998). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1313-1317. * Hogg, M & Vaughan G. (2005). Social psychology (4th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education Ltd. * Huczynski, A & Buchanan, D. (2001). Organizational behaviour: An introductory text (4th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education Ltd. * Onorato, R., & Turner, J. (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept: the shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 257-278. * Passer, M. Smith., R. Holt., N. Bremner., A. Sutherland., E & Vliek, M. (2009). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Education Ltd. * Rodebaugh, T., & Donahue, K. (2007). Could you be more specific, please: Self-discrepancies, affect, and variation in specificity and relevance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(12), 1193-1207. * Strauman, T., & Higgins, E. (1988). Self-Discrepancies as Predictors of Vulnerability to Distinct Syndromes of Chronic Emotional Distress. Journal of Personality, 56(4), 685-707. * Strauman, T. (1996). Stability within the self: A longitudinal study of the structural implications of self-discrepancy theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1142-1153. * Voci, A. (2006). Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 73-90.