Multicultural Studies
2nd period
Being stable in what you do and how you survive is something that many of us strive for. Can you imagine somebody suddenly taking away what supports you? You would have to figure out how to continue to survive in a whole new way that you aren’t familiar with. It sounds horrible, and it is. This is exactly what The Termination Act of 1953 did to the Native Americans. I am against the Termination Act of 1953. I am against The Termination Act of 1953 for several reasons. Although it is said the act was created in hope to benefit the Native Americans, I don’t believe it did. Instead, it created many issues for the Native Americans. In my opinion the act solely benefited the government. The act lowered federal spending efficiently, which of course was a big benefit to taxpayers. Funding to the Native American tribes was stopped. This funding supported a few services that were very useful for the tribes. Some of the services included: medical care, schools, and road maintenance. Unfortunately, these federal services were taken away immediately, which resulted in very bad effects with Native Americans. The Native Americans depended on the government funding for their day-to-day lives. It was hard for the Native Americans to continue living how they did before when the services and funding was taken away. The Native Americans simply didn’t have the knowledge or ability to provide the same types of services for themselves. I can imagine it being very hard and hectic for them to try to survive like this. I can definitely understand why Native Americans viewed the government’s actions as a threat, and why they didn’t like this act at all. The Termination Act of 1953 brought more negative effects than positive. It may have cut taxes and federal spending, but the outcome for the Native American’s tribes was disastrous. Taking away schools, medical services, and road equipment hurt them in the end, due to the fact that they were not able to continue running these services for themselves. As you can see, the outcome was rough, and that is why I am against The Termination Act of 1953.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Chief Joseph gave a very concerned speech on a trip to Washington in 1879. Analyzing Chief Joseph’s speech, proves the point that Native Americans were not being treated equally by any means. In the event that you read the speech aloud you can hear the sorrowfulness and worrisome and extreme concern Chief Joseph has regarding his people. During the migration the Native Americans were a part of a process called forced assimilation which basically made them move to different areas. At this point the Native Americans were furious because they were poor and most of the time on the verge of starving. Considering what the Native Americans were put through they made the decision to attack the migrating Americans. Of course these actions led to casualties and not just Native Americans. In fact there were 70-90 casualties in the Battle of the Big Hole which primarily effected the Nez Percé tribe. Unfortunately, Chief Joseph said “If I cannot go to my own home, let me have a home in a country where my people will not die so fast.” He also adds, “Whenever the white man treats the Indian as they treat each other then we shall have no more wars.” Chief Joseph is just emphasizing the fact that once the Native Americans are treated equally there will be no more violence. Finally in 1885, the Nez percé were allowed to return to the pacific northwest. However, Chief Joseph did not go to the Nez percé reservation instead Joseph settled at the…
- 617 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act called for the government to make treaties that required Native Americans to relocate west. Jackson thought that this policy was “just and liberal.” He thought the Native Americans would be able to keep their way of life. He was wrong. The Indian Removal Act brought a lot of hardship to the Native Americans. It also forever changed the relationship between whites and Native Americans. Before Jackson passed this act, he gave the Native Americans two choices. The two choices were that they could take on white culture and become citizens of the United States, or they could move to the Western territories and keep their…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Andrew Jackson, the man representing the federal government as the President of the United States, actively pursued the Removal Act despite his previous opinion of Natives being so savage it were better to have them driven to extinction. (Wallace, 54) Later, he ruled that all Natives had been conquered and it was the U.S.’ responsibility to “save” these people by moving them away from their ancestral lands and West of the Mississippi. (Wallace,…
- 584 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The natives readily became the victims of the federal government and its policies. The government “allotment system” had detrimental effects on the Native Americans, that included substandard education, decreased health, and poverty (119). Wallace finishes by saying, "Two hundred years of national indecision about how the United States should deal with it's Native Americans have not come to an end" (120). Summing up the narrative that Native Americans today are still, under the pressure of an off keel system that subjects them to racism and…
- 1031 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Eastern Band of Cherokees resisted termination of tribal status and federal responsibilities in Indian affairs during 1940s and 1950s. “For the Eastern Cherokees, the battle over termination began in January 1947” (Nichols, 328). House Concurrent Resolution 108 was an act that called for the abolition of several Indian offices and termination trust responsibilities for certain specified tribes. The Public Law 280 was passed in 1953, which “transferred civil and criminal jurisdiction over most tribes states to the respective local governments and allowed any states to assume similar jurisdiction over their own Indian reservations” (Nichols, 335). The terminationists noted that the Indians deserved better treatment instead of being second-class citizenship because they served well in the war. They stated the Indians should become part of the mainstream American society.…
- 1284 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
toward the Bank of the United giving too much power to the unconstitutional and creating…
- 701 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It discusses how the government has overtaken Native Americans from their homelands and placed to reservations. Laws and policies prohibited tribes from practicing religious and ceremonial rituals. It explains that these laws were not revoked until after the American Indian Religious Freedom Act which protected these natives to have the ability to express their religious views freely. Overall, this suffering ended up weakening the spiritual ties and broke apart many native families and their elders. In the end, it was ultimately brought back to modern society by providing learning programs to bring back traditional languages and rehabilitate Native American rituals to future…
- 676 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…
- 1296 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The end of removal resulted in as what was known as the “Trail of Tears”, this is the process of where the Americans began forced removal of the Native Americans. All of this was allowed under the terms and conditions of the Treaty of Echota. The terms stated that, “the Cherokees had two years to move to their new home in the west.”3 During this many Cherokee lives were lost due to the vulnerability to disease and the…
- 700 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Another, issue that arises when historians talk about the Indian Removal Act is that what values and whose needs were meet when the decision was made. The values that were meet were in the eyes of the American dream to keep expanding from sea to sea. Also, the needs that were met were the needs from both sides but the majority of the needs met were the ones from the Americans because they got land and prosperity out of the law, while the indians got a long and dreadful experience across the country to their new lands that were protected by the American…
- 1004 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
As the government was forcing more tribes to move west, the government didn’t give food nor the supplies to these people and expected them to go migrate by foot. This removal was cruel and an uncivilized to the Native Americans that did no harm to the U.S. territory nor to the society. The Trail of Tears has been a racist act since the reason behind the idea was to get rid of all Indian tribes in U.S. territory and not allowing them back. Picturing the way the Native Americans couldn’t do anything about the Jackson’s order due to no rights to defend themselves, makes my blood boil how nothing could stop the government from taking their land without a warning. And seeing the thousands of people walking miles way to Oklahoma with horses and grief. Existing in that situation of having no rights nor freedom is like living like a slave, being forced to do what the owner orders, and get brutal punishments if they disobey an…
- 589 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For many years prior and during the 1930’s and WWII, there was a huge movement set in motion by the U.S government to destroy every cultural and religious aspect of Native Americans. During those years, as many Indian boarding schools separated young children from their tribes and tried erasing their cultural roots, some changes were being set in motion. For the first time, some people started speaking out about this destruction of culture and new advocates started to try and set policies in place to try and protect Indian traditions. Among them was the commissioner of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, John Collier. During the early years of the war, Collier was advocating for segregated Native American units because he thought they would help…
- 666 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I will say it is a good thing that the Native people took that initiative to govern themselves because of the continued oppression and suffering they experienced at the time. The effect of the residential school that snatched children from their parents and placed them in a school system and violated them physically, emotionally, sexually left its scars.…
- 182 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
There was a new debate in Congress about an act that would make the Native Americans move out of their homeland and into west America. It stirred many questions. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was at the time, thought to be justified and acceptable. There were two groups, the people who wanted the Indian’s gone, and the people who believed they should be allowed to stay. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 that forced the Indians out of their territory was immoral, had no effect on the state of Georgia, and it increased conflict between the Native American tribes.…
- 558 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I have begun the termination process with both my clients and supervisor. I have had several clients that I have worked with on the acute unit who were flagged as High Risk for Suicide that I had to terminate with prior to them being discharged. I have also carried a small caseload in which I started the termination process early (due to my supervisor having to attend a Suicide Prevention Conference in Denver this week). I would say the process was much easier than I expected. All of the veterans were extremely kind and thanked me for my service and wished me well in my future endeavors. I even had one who asked me to come back to work for the VA. That really made my heart smile.…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays