Preview

TERMINATION Twin Notice Rule

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
TERMINATION Twin Notice Rule
TWIN NOTICE RULE Just causes (Art 282, LC) Authorized Causes (Art 283, LC) Health Reasons (Art 284, LC)
Q: What is the purpose of the 2 notices served to the Ee and DOLE 1 month prior to termination?
A:
1. To give the Ees some time to prepare for the eventual loss of their jobs and their corresponding income, look for other employment and ease the impact of the loss of their jobs.
2. To give DOLE the opportunity to ascertain the verity of the alleged cause of termination. (Phil. Telegraph & Telephone Corp. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 147002, April 15, 2005)
Note: Notice to both the Ees concerned and the DOLE are mandatory and must be written and given at least 1 month before the intended date of retrenchment – and the fact that the Ees were already on temporary lay‐off at the time notice should have been given to them is not an excuse to forego the 1‐month written notice. (Sebuguero v. NLRC, G.R. No.115394, Sep. 27, 1995)

Q: What are the 2‐fold requirements of a valid dismissal for a just cause (Art 282, LC)?
A:
1.Substantive – it must be for a just cause ,
2.Procedural – there must be notice and hearing

Q: What is the process to be observed by the employer (Er) for termination of the employment based on any of the just causes for termination? Art. 277b
A:
1. A written notice should be served to the Ee specifying the ground/s for termination and giving the said Ee reasonable opportunity to explain (usually within 5 calendar days from receipt of notice).
Note: This first written notice must apprise the Ee that his termination is being considered due to the acts stated in the notice. (Phil. Pizza Inc. v. Bungabong, G.R. No. 154315, May 9, 2005)
2.A hearing or conference should be held during which the Ee concerned, with the assistance of counsel, if the Ee so desires, is given the opportunity to respond to the charge, present his evidence and rebut the evidence presented against him.
Required only in JUST CAUSE, not in authorized cause
If ee chose NOT to be heard,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Rolon v Commonwealth Unemployment Comp. Bd.of Review, 59 Pa. Commw. 378, 429 A.2d 1256 (1981).…

    • 4200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Defendant, in turn, has filed a countersuit against The Company on the grounds of wrongful termination. Information about the termination was given to The Defendant after she reported that she would be requiring additional time off due to high-risk factors related to her…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: (One or two sentences about what the case is trying to answer – should be in the form of a question). Were the actions of Mrs. Mitchell constituted misconduct under § 59-90-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953?…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheeseman outlines that employment is subject to the common law of contracts (2010). Pat entered into an agreement with NewCorp for employment; acting on the premise that NewCorp would uphold all terms of the employment agreement, made major personal and financial changes to be available for employment at the assigned duty location. Although Pat signed a document acknowledging his understanding that NewCorp had the freedom to discharge at will—Pats supervisor told Pat he was being discharged because “things weren’t working out”. NewCorp did not follow company procedure to notify Pat of unsatisfactory performance and neglected to offer a Corrective Action Plan. NewCorp, having a signed copy of the discharge at will document, could argue that the company was not required to offer Pat notification or the opportunity to follow the Corrective Action Plan process. An important factor in this instance is the implication that Pat is being released based on unsatisfactory performance. NewCorp is terminating the employment contract without complying with all clauses of the employment contract and as a result Pat is taking a financial loss. Additionally, an employer under the Plant Closing Act Is exempt from notification of lay off for reasons unforeseeable at the time of notification—this does not appear to be the case in Pats situation (Cheeseman, 2010). In NewCorp’ s defense, the company could consider the employment agreement to be a voidable contract with NewCorp having the option to avoid their contractual obligations, which although Pat suffered a loss from the termination of employment, would be personally liable for any decisions or financial ramifications…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Claim of Apodaca, 108 N.M. 175, 769 P. 2d 88 (N.M. 1989) an employee cannot be terminated because of a…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Default Judgment 5. Direct Examination 6. Discovery 7. Motion 8. Opening Statement 9.…

    • 18216 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Nash V. Auburn

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court stated that the disciplinary hearing provided them with proper notice of their violation was and sufficient amount of time to prepare their case to an…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Loudermill Case Summary

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    steps that must be taken prior to the separation of the employee. Due process is…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Biddy S Tea

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In July 2010 Miss. Attired filed and was denied unemployment compensation because she was terminated due to “misconduct”.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ADJ Midterm

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    in question. The defense counsel thereafter motioned for a trial order of dismissal. In addition, a…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    litigation assignment 5

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    North Carolina state defendant motion was to dismiss the plantiff’s amended complaint in the case of Dawson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 106 N.C. App. 691. The plantiff’s claim was dismissed for failure to state claim. Under “N.C.R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6)” supports that it can be dismissed under three circumstances ;(1)That no law supports the plantiff’s claim, (2)Plantiff claim is missing, (3)Disclosed in complaint defeats the plantiff’s claim.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dillon V. Jogbra

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Employers that do not follow their disciplinary policies, and related procedures, may get sued for breach of contract or wrongful discharge. Courts have ruled that disciplinary policies can be contracts, even when employers include at-will statements in them, if the policies contain provisions promising that the employer will follow specific disciplinary procedures. So, in Dillon v. Champion Jogbra, Inc., the Vermont Supreme Court found the disclaimer printed in an employee manual was in conflict with the employer's elaborate discipline and discharge system, which the employer said would be carried out in a fair and consistent manner. The Court ruled that the employer was sending mixed messages to employees about their status. Accordingly, it allowed a terminated employee to pursue her breach of implied contract claim since the employer had apparently adhered to these procedures in almost all other cases. Thus, your disciplinary policy should include "at-will" language stating that the policy is only a guideline, that management reserves the right to exercise its discretion in implementing it, and that you retain the right to discharge employees immediately. This case highlights the care that employers should take with the design of employee handbooks. Even where a handbook contains a prominent disclaimer stating that it does not establish any contract rights, an employer must be careful with all of the handbook’s wording to not create a contractual liability.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Employment Rights Act 1996 and Employment Rights (Dispute Resolution) Act 1998 require that details of the disciplinary procedures must be given to employees along with their statement of terms and conditions of employment within two months of starting work. The statement should also indicate a person to whom employees can appeal if they are dissatisfied with a disciplinary decision and the manner in which the appeal should be made.…

    • 2046 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. That this action be dismissed, and if it is not dismissed that a Family Mediation Conference and Order for Mediation. Documents are supported by Exhibit A.…

    • 434 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Dismissal: there are rules and guidelines employers must follow when wanting to dismiss an employee. Again these can vary depending…

    • 5904 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics