I agree with William Mcgurn because terrorizing humans is unjustified act, my definition of terrorism is an act of violence that scare people in everywhere outdoors or inside doors with unjustified legally reason, torturing people for selfish and unreasonable reasons with untrue claims is not justified at all in anywhere on this plant one example of many terrorism acts that represent my explanation is what happened in the trade center booming 9/11.…
- Poundmaker died 4 months after his release in Crowfoots camp on July 4th 1986.…
Dictionary.com defines terrorism as, “The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes; the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization; and a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.” Terrorism has been around since the 1st Century AD. Many civilizations have used terrorists tactics on a weakened state or a state they which to overthrow. One of the first uses of modern terrorism was Maxmilien Robespierre. After the French Revolution, Robespierre was a dictator that used terrorism to remain in control. He stated that, “Subdue by terror the enemies of liberty, and you will be right, as founders of the Republic.” In the late 1960s, International Terrorism took the world over with hijacking. Of recent most terrorism is based on an ideology and religion.…
Terrorism is often associated nowadays with radical extremist groups, who use terror as their only method of power to attain their goals from others. The first time “terror” was actually used however was during the French revolution. The reign of terror was seen in the aftermath of the execution of the King. It was a product of the mentality of the revolution. With everyday that passed, the uncertainty amongst the people grew, and actions became more and more drastic. With the King no longer in the picture, the Jacobins and the Girondins were more enemies to one another than ever before. During the French Revolution, it can be debated whether or not the terror that was used can be seen as a sign of power or as a sign of weakness. Whether it was out of power or weakness, the terror was a direct result of the mentality of the revolution.…
The first premise to my argument is the fact that terrorism is not as immoral as war; the majority of proof collected to support this premise is obtained from Lionel K. McPherson’s article, “Is Terrorism Distinctively Wrong?” McPherson raises a rival view to Walzer and suggests, “terrorism is the deliberate use of force against noncombatants, which can be expected to cause wider fear among them, for political ends[1].” The first piece of evidence lies in the fact that noncombatant deaths contribute to between 75 and 90 percent of all war deaths. McPherson points out that we do not know the reason of these deaths, but because it happened during the period of war, it can safely be said that whether it be directly or indirectly, war leads to a high number of civilian casualties. Moreover, terrorism is considered wrong because of the fact that it instills fear in the civilians, but as McPherson asserts, civilians have more to fear when it…
Terrorism It is described variously as both tactic and strategy; a crime and a holy duty; a justified reaction to oppression and an inexcusable abomination. Has been an effective tactic of the weaker side in a conflict. United Nations defined terrorism on 1992, it is ‘an anxiety-inspiring method of repeated violent action, employed by (semi-) clandestine individual, group or state actors, for idiosyncratic, criminal or political reasons, whereby - in contrast to assassination - the direct targets of violence are not the main targets.’ (United States Department of Defense): ‘the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.’…
In the post-9/11 world, public officials have tried to define terrorism and understand its roots. President George W. Bush argued that terrorism is incited by “‘persistent poverty and oppression.’” Because these factors “‘can lead to hopelessness and despair,’” he argued, “‘failed states can become havens for terror’” (Krieger and Meierrieks 3). While valid, this argument falls slightly short of understanding the full problem. Many argue that terrorism is incited by individuals with psychological problems, but the roots of it are really much more profound. Oftentimes, it is well-educated individuals who are weary of their social conditions that bring on terrorism. Terrorism is often a calculated, rational response to political oppression. The political oppression that the Muslims experienced throughout the twentieth…
The word ‘terrorism’ instantly makes people shudder; the negative connotations and controversies surrounding terrorism in modern society are enough to spark a discussion of whether it is justifiable or not. In order to determine whether or not terrorism can be justified, a clear definition must be decided upon. Decades before the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001, the definition of the word terrorism was hard to define. Political figures around the globe argued and disagreed on what they thought should have determined the act of terrorism.1 Now, there are multiple different definitions originating from distinct cultures and societies, suggesting that terrorism is in the eye of the victim. One definition of terrorism is “any violent or criminal act planned for a political or ideological purpose2”; while another claims that terrorism is understood to be a direct attack on innocents3. Since both of these definitions have important components to them, it can be assumed that both traits are essential to defining terrorism. For the purpose of this paper, the definition of terrorism will be understood as ‘a violent attack on innocents for the purpose of political change’. It can be hard for most people to understand the act of injuring and/or killing hundreds, or maybe even tens of thousands of people, as justifiable. However, if the innocents are seen as legitimate targets, the violent acts of terrorism can be carried out without justification. In order for innocent people to be perceived as legitimate targets or combatants, there must be a defined situation of total war. Total war is a type of warfare where a state or a nation battling and fighting with another, mobilizing all accessible resources and population to aid in the battles and the overall victory. For example, during World War II, all countries involved were deploying their civilian…
Terrorism is a trend which spans centuries, continents and ideologies. It is the act of committing violence against others, be they civilian, military or governments in order to raise awareness about a group, ideology or cause. Throughout history terrorism has been influenced by many forces but three key forces have shaped this trend the most significantly. Religion is often a driving force for acts of terror especially when the perpetrators of terrorism believe their religious practices and views are being oppressed.…
A definition of “terrorism” refers to the use of force or violence against persons or property for the purpose of intimidation, coercion (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2011); Terrorists often use violence and threats to create fear among the public. Terrorism is a criminal act such as airline hijackings, bomb scares, weapons of mass destruction that influences an audience beyond the immediate victim. The strategy of terrorists is to commit acts of violence that draws the attention of the local populace, the government, and the world to their cause. (International Terrorism and Security Research , n.d.)…
Terrorism is not a new military tactic. Back in 50 B.C Julius Caesar encouraged taking hostages to ensure the obedience of conquered tribes. During the French revolution terrorism was put into unrestricted use. Throughout the Reign of Terror, more then 300,000 people were swiftly arrested and another 17,000 were terminated without a fair trial or no trial at all. As sporadic as Terrorism is, it still remains a serious and dangerous problem to society. To understand this problem you must understand where and how a terrorist is created and it always starts with just one radical individual, that is cleaver and manipulative enough to persuade more people to fight. Terrorists also come in many forms, from an old man to a young…
The word “terrorism” comes from Jacobins rule in France from the fall of 1793 to the summer 1794. The Jacobin’s rule was called a reign of terror, because the “ultimate aim was to reshape society and human nature by destroying old regimen, suppressing all enemies of the revolutionary government, and inculcating and enforcing civic virtue.” The Jacobins believed that without terror, virtue would not be enforced, and therefore used death sentences against those not following their virtues, to impose terror in others so they follow those virtues in the future. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).…
Naturally, when one is given the task to explore terrorism, the first thing one would think to do is look up the definition to establish a deeper understanding. Merriam-Webster defines terrorism as: “the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal”. This definition can lead one to believe that the word terrorism is nothing more than a subjective, blanketed term that is used loosely to label any act charged with hatred towards the government. This can also lead one to believe that “Terrorism” is not a word that can be easily defined but definitely has to deal with a basis for political hatred. Currently, scholars can not agree upon a more precise definition for the word. It’s meaning varies from country to country, and even person to person. The media leads the general population to believe that terrorism is any violent act committed by a person with radical political beliefs that is pointed towards high government officials but actually takes the lives of innocent civilians. Of course, the events that happened on September 11th, 2001 echo this sentiment and the media tells every American that this is the definition of terrorism. But does an act of terrorism always have to be committed by a radical thinker from the middle east with a deep-seeded hate for America? Does it always have to be politically charged? Absolutely not. Politically aimed terrorism is just one end of the spectrum; however, both Merriam-Webster and the Mass Media would disagree. Both lead one to believe that all terrorism is politically driven. Many scholars also believe there is another fuel behind terroristic attacks. On the other end of the spectrum lies Religion. This world contains religious fanatics that are just as passionate about their beliefs who are also capable of committing the same heinous…
A common definition of terrorism is the systematic use or threatened use of violence to intimidate a population or government and thereby effect political, religious, or ideological change. First, we may have the wrong idea about what terrorists are trying to achieve, and that their priorities may change over time. In addition, we (and they) may be overestimating their ability to weigh their options. We also don’t realize that emotions play such a big role in their actions. We make the mistake of attaching our own social morals and biases to the actions of terrorists, thinking we understand their motivation, when we have sometimes got it totally wrong. Often they are not looking for political gain, but social benefit. It is also difficult to know exactly what they want, when they appear to be so inconsistent at times.…
Acts of terrorism have a variety of common criteria and methods to achieve such criteria. First, let’s examine what common criteria acts of terrorism have. Terrorism can have a variety of definitions, however, they all surround the same idea. According to Islam and Ryan (2016), acts of terrorism seek to destabilize social order, create a dispute, and undermine societal cohesion to bring political or social change (p. 181). In addition, terrorism can occur internationally (country to country) or domestically. Examples include international terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia or domestic terrorist groups such as Left/Right Wing Extremists and Special Interest Groups (Islam & Ryan, 2016,…