Dirty War: A Definition Of Terrorism
Dirty War Review 1. What is terrorism?
A definition of “terrorism” refers to the use of force or violence against persons or property for the purpose of intimidation, coercion (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2011); Terrorists often use violence and threats to create fear among the public. Terrorism is a criminal act such as airline hijackings, bomb scares, weapons of mass destruction that influences an audience beyond the immediate victim. The strategy of terrorists is to commit acts of violence that draws the attention of the local populace, the government, and the world to their cause. (International Terrorism and Security Research , n.d.)
Also, terrorists deliberately target or destruction of non-combatant targets …show more content…
It is because that situation was very chaotic; people were feeling afraid and uneasy so that they will around the escape. However, they must to be decontaminated before them leave the blast site, otherwise they will expand harm and spread unrest to other regions and people eventually make the society instable. The government must prevents people from leaving the blast site in order to protect them and others, and effective and efficient to control the situation.
6. Should the men in the second van have been given the opportunity to surrender? Why? Why not?
No, it should not give the opportunity to them. If you give a chance to them, first, they won't surrender; second, they are mad, you don’t know what will he do; third, they maybe instant detonation; forth, do not know they have no other members to help them complete the task; fifth, if give them the opportunity to surrender cause to the second attack succeed, the consequences could be disastrous and the government cannot bear this risk.
In addition, they already have sufficient evidence to charge the men engaged in terrorist activities so that they have rights to kill those terrorists immediately in order to protect the public …show more content…
It is because the terrorist attacks are always unexpected and unforeseen especially terrorists can go through different forms of attacks to achieve their aim. In addition, terrorism can succeed or not is base on how the terrorists choose the type of objective and target selection, these arguments supported from the book: “terrorist campaigns with limited territorial objectives (e.g., ending a foreign military occupation) succeed more often than campaigns with maximal objectives (e.g., destruction of a state)” (Brown et al., 2010). Target selection such as choose some lower alertness region is another element for terrorist attacks more easily to
A definition of “terrorism” refers to the use of force or violence against persons or property for the purpose of intimidation, coercion (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2011); Terrorists often use violence and threats to create fear among the public. Terrorism is a criminal act such as airline hijackings, bomb scares, weapons of mass destruction that influences an audience beyond the immediate victim. The strategy of terrorists is to commit acts of violence that draws the attention of the local populace, the government, and the world to their cause. (International Terrorism and Security Research , n.d.)
Also, terrorists deliberately target or destruction of non-combatant targets …show more content…
It is because that situation was very chaotic; people were feeling afraid and uneasy so that they will around the escape. However, they must to be decontaminated before them leave the blast site, otherwise they will expand harm and spread unrest to other regions and people eventually make the society instable. The government must prevents people from leaving the blast site in order to protect them and others, and effective and efficient to control the situation.
6. Should the men in the second van have been given the opportunity to surrender? Why? Why not?
No, it should not give the opportunity to them. If you give a chance to them, first, they won't surrender; second, they are mad, you don’t know what will he do; third, they maybe instant detonation; forth, do not know they have no other members to help them complete the task; fifth, if give them the opportunity to surrender cause to the second attack succeed, the consequences could be disastrous and the government cannot bear this risk.
In addition, they already have sufficient evidence to charge the men engaged in terrorist activities so that they have rights to kill those terrorists immediately in order to protect the public …show more content…
It is because the terrorist attacks are always unexpected and unforeseen especially terrorists can go through different forms of attacks to achieve their aim. In addition, terrorism can succeed or not is base on how the terrorists choose the type of objective and target selection, these arguments supported from the book: “terrorist campaigns with limited territorial objectives (e.g., ending a foreign military occupation) succeed more often than campaigns with maximal objectives (e.g., destruction of a state)” (Brown et al., 2010). Target selection such as choose some lower alertness region is another element for terrorist attacks more easily to