Thailand Should Kept Death Penalty for Certain Crime

Thailand should kept death penalty for certain crime

In Thailand, capital punishment is allowed in this country. It acceptable to keep death penalty in this nations and there is many reasons why this is so. The discussion in this essay is about “Capital punishment deters crime”, “Capital punishment keeps the convicted murderer from killing again”, “Capital punishment balances the scale of Justice” and “Society shouldn’t have to pay the economic costs of life sentences for murders”. This essay will show some idea on the objective and death penalty and how different in death penalty gives different damage to criminal also the point of view of the writer to shows why this country still needs to keep death penalty but some country may not. So, this essay will totally suggest some of the reasonable reason on why Thailand still needs to keep death Penalty as the Capital Punishment.
Capital punishment is “more powerful deterrent against crime than prison”. The crime should receive enough punishment on what they normally do. Like in the past, that we called “eye for an eye, teeth for a teeth” or “law of retaliation” that really effect to the criminal. The criminal who killed the innocent person should be died to serve the innocent life because it is unacceptable for some life to get destroy without reasonable reason. Totally, it should be nothing in the world that can cure someone mind from their parents, friends or relative from their death. But, there is still no conclusive evidence that death penalty is more powerful than deterrent in prison and the criminal usually think that their life is useless to pay and survive before they kill innocent people. So, death penalty is one the good choice to punish the criminal but might not be the best.
Capital punishment guarantees that the criminal will not kill anyone anymore. We are so sure that the criminal that get kill cannot run away and killed any people because the criminal is already death. If we poisoned the criminal in the jail, the criminal might kill the other criminal in the jail because the criminal mind got crazy after the criminal killed people. The reason that they usually gone crazy is because that the last effect of killing and the one that got killed last sight to the criminal usually destroys criminal mind because the virgin life got killed by human that is the same species. But, some of the murderers that accidently kill person may feel sorry and don’t want to kill anyone again. Thailand still needs this punishment because there are some people who someone paid for them to killed a lot of innocent people and messing the country. So, death penalty is still need in Thailand because of these people.
Capital punishment balances the scale of justice because ultimate crime needs to get paid by ultimate penalty. For example, Stealing ten thousand baht need to get a punishment like giving the money back and pay fine around hundred thousand baht or jailing for six months. But killing people by accidently may be jailed for 10 years. But if you plan to kill this person directly, capital punishment is the good choice that you should receive after killing that person. A fairness of punishment to the crime is very important so, the other will think and understand before they do the other thing. Sometimes prison is too weak to punish many murderers. But, it might be able to call as a revenge because there is moral limits that we shouldn’t torture the murderers. Some way of capital punishment is like revenge in a form of torturing. For example, electric chair, shooting, hanging or throwing stone to the criminal. So, some way of capital punishment is unacceptable but some way is still needed.
Society shouldn’t have to pay the economic costs of life sentences for murders because we give them too much hope to reforming their life and who they used to do. Why does the society still need to pay a lot of tax to help the worst criminal in the world? It is not our fault that they kill innocent people, why don’t we just kill them so these kinds of people disappear from this world. But we still need to respect human life, they need to eat and sleep like us. So, the judge may decide which crime needs death penalty or which crime shouldn’t. So, the tax doesn’t have to increase much to severe these criminal.
Thailand still needs capital punishment because all of the reason above is reasonable enough for death penalty in Thailand and Thailand still have a lot of crime. So, the government might decided which crime needs capital punishment and which crime doesn’t so the judging scale become fair and balanced in the country.