Preview

Thank You for Smoking

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thank You for Smoking
Intro:

The essay “Thank You for Smoking,” written by Peter Brimelow, is far from an influential essay on why people should smoke. Through this essay, Brimelow makes an effort to convince the audience smoking is actually beneficial to your health. I find it hard for people to write about what they think are the benefits of smoking when there are so many obvious reasons why you should not smoke.

The main audience being targeted in this article is those who already smoke and those who are thinking about smoking. One thing mentioned in the article is the fact that smokers are usually lighter in weight. In my personal opinion, I would rather eat a balanced diet and walk daily rather than walk around with a cigarette in my mouth and risk lung cancer.

Inductive or Deductive:

When trying to find if an essay is logically stated, you first must find if it is inductive or deductive. This is an example of an inductive essay. What inductive means is that the author goes from using specific samples to generalizations that are drawn from those examples (McFadden).

Major Claim:

The major claim is usually the topic sentence or main idea in the article (McFadden). Through the major claim, Peter points out that smoking has beneficial factors. He states those who smoke are less likely to get many diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, osteoarthritis, and colon cancer (Brimelow 142).

Another example used in this essay is the author’s comparison of driving automobiles to smoking cigarettes. Brimelow states, “But so is driving automobiles dangerous to your health (over 40,000 deaths a year)” (141). This to me just seems like a completely ridiculous comparison to include in this article, especially when in the prior paragraph he states that there are approximately 400,000 deaths annually, which are smoking-related (Brimelow).

Minor Claim:

One minor claim pointed out through this essay is how smoking



Cited: Brimelow, Peter. “Thank You for Smoking…?” The Genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston: Thomson Heinle, 1998. 141-143. Clark, Irene L. The Genre of Argument. Boston: Thompson Heinle, 1998 McFadden, James. Introduction to Toulmin Method. Lecture. Sept. 12 & 14, 2003. Buena Vista University. Storm Lake, IA.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although King is able to display her feelings openly and portrays the article well from her point of view, she fails to write her article in a way the reader can understand and doesn 't recognize the proven negative effects smoking can have on your health .…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, tr John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise On argumentation. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We developed an understanding of the long and short term risks with smoking through researching on the internet on websites to do with cancer research and ASH. We discovered a lot of benefits to stopping smoking. One benefit was that their life expectancy increased and stopping also helped their lungs to recover and decreased the risk of contracting diseases such as Emphysema. We found information about pregnant women and their unborn children and how smoking can effect them. We found that the child could be miscarried, or they could have a considerably lower birth rate compared to other children whose mothers didn’t smoke during their pregnancy. Furthermore, we also found information about how harmful passive smoking is to children and adults. We found out that young children could experience cot death and become deaf through middle ear disease. Furthermore, we found information supporting that adults could contract lung cancer through passive smoke which we found was 80% invisible.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You of Smoking

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film Thank You for Smoking is a dark comedy that follows a lobbyist, Nick Naylor, for the tobacco industry. Dark comedies take a serious topic, and make light of the topic through satire. A good example of rhetoric can be found inThank You for Smoking during a scene where Nick Naylor delivers an argument against putting a skull and crossbones label on every pack of cigarettes. This is done during a hearing in front of a congressional committee lead by Senator Finistirre from Vermont. Naylor’s audience is the committee and members of the audience including his young son. Naylor is defending a controversial idea with controversial evidence and support, whether it goes against what he believes or not. Naylor’s own morality gets called into question. Logos, pathos, kairos, and ethos, the pillars of rhetoric, can all be found throughout Naylor’s defense. Rhetorical fallacies can also be found throughout the sequence.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    MLA Format

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I like this essay because smoking is a controversy topic. I like the way that the writer points out how popular culture, especially advertising promote smoking behavior. Obviously, message from tobacco advertising is powerful and dangerous since it could increase smoking behavior and negatively impact on human health. The writer also provides some solutions for people having nicotine addiction. Finally, some new information in the essay is new for me, and that create the interest for me while reading this essay.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Center for disease Control reports that cigarette smoke causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the United States. This is about one in five deaths. The center adds that smoking causes more deaths every year than Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm- related incidents. With this being a known fact there are still smokers in today’s world. The question that should be asked is why do people smoke cigarettes despite their proven dangers? Smoking cannot only damage or bring harm to every organ in the human body, but it can cause countless diseases. If people just stopped smoking altogether, they would decrease the risk of smoke-related diseases and most importantly…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Speech Outline

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Preview of main points: First of all, briefly, I will talk about the problem you can get from smoking – the harm it can give to the smoker, the non-smoker and the environment. Then, I will talk about some solutions to the problem and finally, I will tell you how you will benefit from giving up smoking.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ayes section of the case study had statistics from World Health Organization showing that tobacco use was the cause of over 3 million deaths in 1990, and over 4 million deaths in 1998, and these figures were expected to keep on rising. Those in favor also pointed out that tobacco advertising is often focused on young people, and that the advertisements encouraged children and young people to try cigarettes in hopes that they would start smoking. If more people start and continue smoking inevitably, there will eventually be more healthcare costs. The conflict of interest that surrounds this issue is that the tobacco industry is one of the biggest employers in India, so if tobacco advertising is banned, and tobacco sales drop, 26 million people could potentially be out of work. Those in favor of the ban cite a study based on tobacco consumption…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been some debate recently about whether smoking should be banned. Smoking has been considered a controversial issue recently due to many negative effects bring from it. Deborah Arnott, in her article “Legislation to ban tobacco will save thousands of lives” (Guardian, September 2009) suggest that smoking should be banned in all public places and in private as well. While David Hockney ‘s article, entitled “ The anti – smoking bigots should butt out “ (The Guardian Online, September 2008) takes the opposite view : smoking should not be banned . This essay will critically respond to both of these articles.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You for Smoking

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The book/article Thank You For Not Smoking is a 1994 satirical novel written by Christopher Buckley, and written as an e-article by Peter Brimelow. It was also made into a dark comedy film in 2005, written and directed by Jason Reitman and starring Aaron Eckhart, In the article, the story follows a tobacco industry lobbyist named Nick Naylor. Like most lobbyist, Naylor is a cunning, level headed support of the tobacco industry, with many arguments he provides throughout the article on why smoking is good. His claims are not always so simple and straight forward, but instead he uses many different tactics to convince people to agree with him and take his side. There are many good examples of rhetoric in the article, one of them being his argument against the skull crossbones death symbol on every pack, a symbol that causes each pack to not only have a warning label, but a potentially scary visual image to go along with it. This is done in front of a Congressional committee and an audience which includes his young son, during a hearing in Vermont. He defends a highly debatable idea with arguable evidence and support, whether it affects him positively or not. Pretty much all of the main points of rhetoric are in Naylor’s arguments. His argument has a relatively decent ethos, logos, and pathos.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thank You for Smoking

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the movie Thank You for Smoking, Nick Naylor is a handsome man, smooth talking tobacco lobbyist and the vice-president of a tobacco lobby called the “Academy of Tobacco Studies”. Naylor’s job consists mainly of reporting the questionable research of the company to the public and defending Big Tobacco on television programs by questioning health claims and advocating their personal choice about cigarette. While Nick Naylor’s morals maybe questionable, he has the talent for whipping up an argument in his favor as he believes and tells his young son in his own words “if you argue correctly, you’re never wrong.” Nick Naylor throughout the movie is trying to demolish the senator’s idea of having images of skulls and crossbones on every pack of cigarettes and the poison sign. Nick Naylor’s duty is to fight for his company in the worst and most hazardous times. His son Joey Naylor accompanies his father on every business trip. The reason why Naylor does that is so he can understand the intricacies of his job better and also trains his son to follow in his footsteps to learn about the art of molding the truth in personal favor. The big question is whether Nick Naylor has evolved morally at the end of the movie. From this question, there arises a set of central issues in the movie: does Nick Naylor’s ’s ability to spin control spin his moral compass in the right direction, and do his professional skills effect the evolution of his relationship with his son?…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this article, the writer sets out that smoking is good in many aspects and brings benefits to the smoker. The writer is just being irrelevant and ridiculous about his statement. At the beginning, the writer states in jeered way he knows the “ill effect” of smoking. But then, he condemns the effects of smoking has been exaggerated. The writer’s rudeness and arrogant are shown when there were people admonish him.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You for Smoking

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There’s something exhilarating about watching a clever liar in full, resplendent flight. Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckhardt) has what he cheerfully describes as a "challenging" job: he represents the interests of the tobacco industry in a world that generally considers the product reprehensible. At the beginning of "Thank You For Smoking," Nick is getting ready to defend himself on the Joan Lunden talk show, in the company of anti-smoking do-gooders and a cancer-stricken, bald teenaged boy.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    dfghdrtgrtetet

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Banning Smoking Sample Outline for an Informative Speech Adapted from a speech by Harinder Kaur…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    hate crimes

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milner, Colin. “The Perfect Body Could Be Detrimental to Our Health.” Dynamic Argument. Ed. Robert Lamm and Justin Everett. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005. 697-8.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays