The first aspect that makes Reitman’s movie intriguing was the genuine acting. Nick serves as the vice-president of the Academy of Tobacco Studies, using the skills of a debater to win over his arguments. He always has a smile on his face that makes someone wonder if he is happy or just gloating. Nick faces many…
Thank You for Smoking is a criticism of today's "culture of spin". The hero of the film is Nick Naylor (Eckhart), the Chief Spokesman for Big Tobacco whose task was to defend the rights of smokers and cigarette makers while health advertisements and programmes call for stopping smoking which has a relationship with cancer. He knows very well the bad and damaging effects of cigarettes which may lead to death, but he wanted to win against other people’s arguments, as that was his job & duties. That was clearly shown in the scene when he told his young son Joey, "The beauty of an argument is that if you argue correctly, you're never wrong."…
In a study conducted through the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, it was found that between the years of 1998-2006, fifty percent of American children were exposed to second hand smoke on a daily basis. Dave Eggers, having experienced this statistic first-hand, tends to have a very biased but yet unique opinion as to why smokers continue with their habit-- even though they are all well aware of the possible outcomes of their choices. In 1998, Eggers wrote an essay that was published in Esquire Magazine. Continuing to fight the idea of smoking and it’s after-effects, Eggers uses personal experience, interviews, and research into tobacco companies to depict the one idea in regards to a smoker’s death that has gone unanswered for far too long: “Ultimately, who’s to blame?”…
Nick demonstrates that he is a true, unbiased narrator. When he was younger, his father tells him, “Whenever you feel like criticizing anyone, just remember that all the people in the world haven’t had the advantages you had” (FitzGerald 1). Nick lives his life through these words his father passed down to him. This is the main reason he does not speak his mind in the spur of the moment. Later Nick gives us further insight on his self, and says, “I’m inclined to reserve all judgments, a habit that has opened up many curious natures to me and also made me the victim of not a few veteran bores” (Fitzgerald 1). If a dull person were talking to Nick, Nick’s custom of reserving his opinion would keep him from telling the person to be quiet. I think this is a characteristic that makes Nick unique, especially…
Separate from other critics, some recognize that although Nick has come to a deceitful, ugly place, he has enough moral courage to be aware of himself. Nick is aware of his need in situations and places himself only in the matters of his business. He said, “Calmness wasn’t an end in itself, I made an excuse at the first possible moment, and got to my feet” (Fitzgerald 87). This quote is applicable when explaining why Nick has…
1. Weak-minded will people think that buying products of certain color will help find the cure of cancer…
Nick Naylor is described as having a “bachelor in kicking ass,” and accompanying this metaphor is the non-diegetic sound of a machine gun, symbolising the power and destruction of his PR spin on tobacco. Reitman satires the social perception on cigarettes; “they’re cool … our job’s practically done for us” and provides the irony of the lobby groups; the acronym “SAFETY” aims for increased gun rights. Reitman presents Naylor as having the near impossible task of convincing the public that cigarettes are okay, and using this characterisation to stress the moral incoherence that is associated with his job. As Reitman ironically belittles Naylor, so too does Antony use irony; “Brutus is an honourable man” to undermine the reasoning behind the assassination. The composers have utilised their characters to present conflicting perspectives, be it on Caesar’s assassination or the tobacco industry, to show that they are negative situations, and thus effectively manipulate the audience’s perspectives on…
The film Thank You for Smoking is a dark comedy that follows a lobbyist, Nick Naylor, for the tobacco industry. Dark comedies take a serious topic, and make light of the topic through satire. A good example of rhetoric can be found inThank You for Smoking during a scene where Nick Naylor delivers an argument against putting a skull and crossbones label on every pack of cigarettes. This is done during a hearing in front of a congressional committee lead by Senator Finistirre from Vermont. Naylor’s audience is the committee and members of the audience including his young son. Naylor is defending a controversial idea with controversial evidence and support, whether it goes against what he believes or not. Naylor’s own morality gets called into question. Logos, pathos, kairos, and ethos, the pillars of rhetoric, can all be found throughout Naylor’s defense. Rhetorical fallacies can also be found throughout the sequence.…
Harms of Smoking and Health Benefits of Quitting - National Cancer Institute. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/cessation…
The newest fad related to tobacco smoking is vaping. According to Liz Neporent of ABC News, “The electronic cigarette was invented in the 1960s, but it didn 't really take off until a decade ago.” Electronic cigarettes are seen everywhere in the public. “Thanks for Vaping,” posted by Sky Dylan-Robbins of The New Yorker, talks about all the questions that come with this new mysterious fad. The electronic cigarette will become the next tobacco problem, many people do not know what electronic cigarettes are, they are not FDA approved, children have easy access to electronic cigarettes, unknown potential health risk.…
In the movie “Thank you for smoking”, big companies are seen as having no social responsibility with its consumers and the people that are affected by their products when they clearly know the negative effects and impacts that their products have in society. The big companies in the movie are the ones that belong to the tobacco industry and concentrate in the cigarette business. These companies are shown as not caring for the damage that tobacco does and that regardless of the effects of cigarettes on people, because they still want to sell their product in order to earn a profit. These companies fund an association called The Academy of Tobacco Studies, whose main purpose is to research the connection that may exist between cigarettes and lung cancer. In the association a very important employee named Nick Naylor, who is the main character of the movie, holds two very important roles, that of chief spokesman and vice-president. Nick Naylor has the hard job of representing the interests of tobacco companies in a society that finds tobacco despicable. In other words, he tries to persuade people that the tobacco companies and cigarettes are not bad for people, when globally it is known that tobacco kills. It is known that tobacco kills because it is the primary producer of lung cancer. Throughout the whole movie many clear evidences on how these tobacco companies have no social responsibility can be seen.…
The movie, “Thank You for Smoking” is a comedy with a tobacco industry lobbyist, Nick Naylor as the lead. The movie has an eerie comic theme which tackles the serious issue of the addicting substance of tobacco, or to be more specific, nicotine. The idea which the movie was trying to portray was that this lobbyist was a great speaker who is able to manipulate many a feeble-mind. A lobbyist, to begin with, is one who is employed to persuade all-concerned of the employer’s concern(s), in this case, the marketing of tobacco products.…
Tobacco advertising has changed drastically over the years, mainly in terms of an increase in regulation. Cigarette commercials were prohibited from airing on television long ago. Ads that are still able to run elsewhere are not allowed to “glorify” the act of smoking, and they cannot use images or tactics that obviously target children as an audience. They are also legally required to display the Surgeon General’s warnings about the dangers of smoking. But regardless of these rules, tobacco companies still manage to successfully advertise their products, whether ethically or otherwise.…
I feel that Nick is simply the viewer in most cases, providing a sort of clear lens to see the events unfolding through.…
“Thank You For Smoking” is a satirical comedy which is graceful, yet brutal. This film targets the pro-tobacco lobbyists, who would like the public to believe that smoking cigarettes is not harmful. It stars Aaron Eckhart as Nick Naylor, who is the spokesman for the Academy of Tobacco Studies. The opening scene starts with Nick appearing on "The Joan Lunden Show," sitting beside a bald-headed boy named Robin, a 15-year-old boy dying of cancer, but who has stopped smoking. Nick is ready for the challenge that awaits him. He speaks to the audience and to the cameras, "It's in our best interests to keep Robin alive and smoking." He goes on to imply that "The anti-smoking people want Robin to die." Does Nick really care about people's health or just the “bottom line” of the company he represents, which directly benefits his personal “bottom line”? His position keeps him very busy, spinning the public's heads so they can not tell which direction the truth is coming from. Nick seems to be so disconnected from reality that he misses the fact that his son Joey, who we will soon meet, is only a few years younger than Robin. As the cherry on top, he states that “Big Tobacco” is pledging $50 million towards an anti-teen smoking campaign.…