Preview

The American Jusicial SYstem ad Japanese American Internment During WOrld War II Korematsu v. United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The American Jusicial SYstem ad Japanese American Internment During WOrld War II Korematsu v. United States
DBQ 4: Supporting Racial Internment During World War II

10/28/2013

Many American citizens today do not know that during World War II, the Fascist Party in Germany were not the only ones to have concentration camps with a specific race occupying them. Between the end of 1941 till the end of the war, the United States evacuated and imprisoned around 127,000 people of Japanese ancestry. During this internment period, a supreme court case arose against Fred Korematsu where he was found guilty by a six to three verdict of trying to leave the state of California when all Japanese were prohibited from leaving and supposed to report to a relocation center. Although deemed unconstitutional today, the majority has strength in the letter of the law but weakness in racial prejudice; the dissenting argument has strength with using the Constitution but is weak in explaining military actions; and finally the line that should be clear before being crossed with "military necessity." To gain further insight on the subject it would be best to explore the majorities strengths and weakness first. The majority opinion in the case has strengths with the letter of the law, but is weak on the topic of racial prejudice. When Justice Black delivered the opinion of the court in December 18, 1944, he first restates the law ( Exclusion Order No. 34 and Executive Order No. 9066, 7 Fed. Reg. 1407) that the defendant," ... knowingly and admittedly violated... a number of military orders and proclamations," (Doc 1 247). The Exclusion Order No. 34 states that all persons of Japanese ancestry in the designated military areas on the West coast have a curfew from 6 AM to 8 PM and to report to a relocation center to be moved away from the West coast. Also, the Executive Order gave the police and military authorities power to take action in protecting the nation from espionage and sabotage. With these two pieces of legislation Justice Black along with the other five justices

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Justice Owen J. Roberts saw the situation as a clear violation of Korematsu's Constitutional rights. Roberts was quoted as saying, “ . . .it is a case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Roberts saw the discrimination in the way Executive Order 9066 was being carried out. Just as Adolph Hitler was funneling Jew into Concentration Camps in Germany, the United States was similarly doing the same thing to Japanese…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Once President Franklin D. Roosevelt announced war against Japan, many Japanese-Americans started to fear for their lives, due to the fact many people assumed, they were partly responsible. Seventy-four days after the bombing, President Roosevelt, issued an executive order No. 9066. This order authorized the Secretary of War to force Japanese-Americans…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On December 7, 1941 the Japanese Imperial Navy launched an attack on Pearl Harbor, the next day Congress declared war on Japan. Public opinion towards people of any “Asian” ancestry turned to racial hatred. Under political and public pressure Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19th, 1942 (Alonso 30). Enter one of the Dark times in American History, the imprisonment of its own citizens because of racial backgrounds. The act was attacked in the Supreme Court case “Hirabayasi v. United States,” though the Supreme Court upheld the order as “A means of National Security in war time” (Touro Law 2). In May of 1942 Fred Korematsu sued the United States. In a 6-to-3 vote the Supreme Court…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I chose the landmark case of Korematsu v. United States for this research paper. Back on December 7, 1941 the Japanese attacked US Naval forces in Pearl Harbor located in Hawaii. The next day the US declared war on Japan and everyone was in a panic wondering what would happen next. The United States joined World War II and all Japanese and Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and put into camps, because the US government was afraid that there could spies or that the people with a Japanese heritage could turn against America. Executive Order 9066 was put into place by President Roosevelt and this order made it possible to put anyone from full Japanese to even 1/16th into special facilities where they were seclude from the general population. Was the Executive Order unconstitutional or not? Fred Korematsu was a native born citizen of the US, but was of Japanese heritage and he was convicted on September 8, 1942 of being in a place where Japanese weren’t allowed. Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court and in a 6-3 vote they sided with the government, because they said that the potential spying and espionage was more important than Korematsu’s Constitutional rights. From my research I have concluded that even though Korematsu got his case overturned in 1984 because of untruthful information it was still unfair that it is still deemed Constitutional that there were internment camps for Japanese-Americans. Amendments 1, 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, and 15 of the United States Constitution were all violated and I will explain why in this paper.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result, Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps, regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American citizen, refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore, he was convicted of disobeying the law. This landmark court case was deemed unconstitutional due to the violation of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, Executive Order no. 9066 is one of the most controversial things looked upon in America's history. Historians, Americans, and Japanese review the historical episode and re-examine their ideas about the history of the U.S. and the lessons it teaches today. Although there are opposing thoughts, Japanese internment camps during WWII were vital and extremely necessary for the U.S. because…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II, a time of confusion and fear settled around America. Previously respected and average everyday citizens became feared and outcast by most people in the United States. “All citizens alike, both in and out of uniform feel the impact of war in greater or lesser measure (Justice Hugo Black).” The government declared that all the people of Japanese descent living along the Pacific coast be sent to live in concentration camps where the living arrangements were not the most pleasant and were overcrowded.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Japanese Internment was a completely justified and strategical move based upon the destruction and fear brought by the attack on Pearl Harbor, the deception and betrayal the Japanese stretched upon us, and the evidence and beliefs against the Japanese such as the stereotype presented in document 3 or the 50 to 60 dangerous Japanese soldiers in each…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For four years, Japanese–American citizens really questioned exactly how much their U.S. citizenship really protected and kept them safe from harm and danger. The fear and pain that they went through should have had some sort of affect on the people responsible for these horrid camps. This shouldn’t be the case, everyone should feel safe and secure in the country that they call home.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese internment camps. Justice Hugo Black stated that although the exclusion order imposed hardships upon a large number of Japanese-American citizens, hardships are part of war. Justice Black goes on to say that the curtail of the civil rights of a single racial group should immediately be suspect and be looked into (Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214).That courts should subject any law that infringes on the civil rights of a racial group should be looked under the most scrutiny like as if they were looking at it threw a micro scope. Justice Black also goes on to say that when under the conditions of warfare and our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect them must be commensurate with the threatened danger.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The internment of Japanese Americans was an immoral act based on prejudice and imagined threat rather than justice and law. The social, physical, and physiological consequences of living in overcrowded camps were lifelong. It took years for the Japanese Americans to re-establish themselves again as trustworthy US citizens. Today, the society cherishes and admires Japanese Americans for their healthy lifestyle, longevity, and intelligence.…

    • 63 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese Internment

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the question of morality raised by the japanese internment camps, the United States government was completely justified in the relocation of the japanese-American citizens given the situation the entire country was placed in during World War II. Critics of the japanese interment must take into consideration the dire position the United States was caught in after the bombing of Pearl Harbor had recently taken place. A number of Japanese-Americans located on the west coast were later discovered to have been conspiring with the Japanese military intelligence, which presented a clear message to the United States government that no risks could be taken in preserving the national security of the rest of the American citizens. Although the Japanese internment can be compared the the concurrent Jewish concentration camps to some extent, the Japanese were not subjected to the harsh labor or starvation conditions experienced by their Jewish counterparts. In addition, the Japanese were offered financial compensation for their lost property and businesses both before and after their stay in the internment camps, while the Jewish population in Germany were subjected to the destruction of their property during the Kristallnacht. Some individuals have also argued that the relocation of the japanese population was a direct violation of civil rights granted by the U.S. Constitution; however, unconstitutional measures were also taken in the past during times of imminent warfare and civil unrest. A prime example of such an instance is the suspension of habeas corpus by Abraham Lincoln during the civil war. In order to discourage further riots and local militia rebellions, Lincoln was motivated by both his generals and the national security of his people to withhold their to a court during a time of national…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays