Preview

Korematsu vs. the United States

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1908 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Korematsu vs. the United States
Abstract
I chose the landmark case of Korematsu v. United States for this research paper. Back on December 7, 1941 the Japanese attacked US Naval forces in Pearl Harbor located in Hawaii. The next day the US declared war on Japan and everyone was in a panic wondering what would happen next. The United States joined World War II and all Japanese and Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and put into camps, because the US government was afraid that there could spies or that the people with a Japanese heritage could turn against America. Executive Order 9066 was put into place by President Roosevelt and this order made it possible to put anyone from full Japanese to even 1/16th into special facilities where they were seclude from the general population. Was the Executive Order unconstitutional or not? Fred Korematsu was a native born citizen of the US, but was of Japanese heritage and he was convicted on September 8, 1942 of being in a place where Japanese weren’t allowed. Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court and in a 6-3 vote they sided with the government, because they said that the potential spying and espionage was more important than Korematsu’s Constitutional rights. From my research I have concluded that even though Korematsu got his case overturned in 1984 because of untruthful information it was still unfair that it is still deemed Constitutional that there were internment camps for Japanese-Americans. Amendments 1, 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, and 15 of the United States Constitution were all violated and I will explain why in this paper.

The Korematsu v. United States was argued on October 11 and 12, 1944 and was decided on December 18, 1944 (Touro College, 1997). Justice Black delivered the Court 's opinion. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese-American citizen was arrested and convicted of staying in a "Military Area" in San Leandro, California



References: Chemerinsky, Erwin. "Korematsu v. United States: A Tragedy Hopefully Never to Be Repeated - Pepperdine Law Review." Pepperdine Law Review. Digital Commons, 15 Dec. 2011. Web. 03 May 2014. http://pepperdinelawreview.com/korematsu-v-united-states-a-tragedy-hopefully-never-to-be-repeated/ FindLaw. (2004). U.S. Supreme Court. Toyosaburo Korematsu v. UNITED STATES, 323 U.S. 214 (1944). Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=323&invol=214 Jackson, Robert. "Fred Korematsu." The Robert H. Jackson Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 May 2014. http://www.roberthjackson.org/the-man/speeches-articles/articles/remembering-korematsu/fred-korematsu/ Konkoly, Toni. "Famous Dissents." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 02 May 2014. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/personality/landmark_korematsu.html Randall, Vernellia R. (2004, April 11). Internment of Japanese Americans in Concentration Camps. Retrieved April 17, 2014, from http://academic.udayton.edu/race/02rights/intern01.htm#Korematsu Smart, Chris. "Rights Violated to Japanese Americans." Rights Violated to Japanese Americans. Senate Publication 1028-s ( P. 30-34), 02 May 2000. Web. 01 May 2014. http://online.sfsu.edu/jaintern/rightsviolated.html Touro College. (1997). Korematsu v. United States. Retrieved April 29, 2014, from http://tlc-patch.tourolaw.edu/patch/CaseSummary.asp#Korematsu

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Summary - Fred Korematsu refused to obey the wartime order to leave his home and report to a relocation camp for Japanese Americans. He was arrested and convicted. After losing in the Court of Appeals, he appealed to the United States Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of the deportation order.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    their ethnicity. That is not what America stands for and we should never approve of…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Korematsu V Us

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During World War II, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed Executive Order 9066 which allowed the Secretary of War to declare certain areas as "military zones" and gave the military power over the attorney general. These newly declared military zones were made in the western US and were areas "from which any or all persons could be excluded". Although the document does not specify any races or ethnic groups, later orders issued that all people of Japanese decent (even American citizens) were excluded from these military zones that included all of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii. The Japanese in these areas were forced to evacuate to Internment Camps; where they could only bring what they could carry with them and where they would stay until further notice. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen (American born) who decided to stay at his home in California during this time and was arrested for the violation of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Korematsu challenged his arrest and the case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was questioned if Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu's 14th and 5th amendment rights (right to equal protection under the law and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness). The court also questioned if Korematsu's constitutional rights were allowed to be violated due to the special circumstances of war. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government by ruling that the government was permitted to deny the Japanese of their constitutional rights because of military considerations, and that such exclusion was not beyond the war powers of congress and the president since it was done with national security in mind. Almost 40 years later after serving his sentence, Korematsu brought his case back to court filing for a writ of Coram Nobis to correct the previous ruling and achieve justice. Korematsu won this…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Korematsu v United States was a court case that argued that the orders provided to Korematsu were based on race only and were contradictory. Because they were only based on race, Korematsu argued they were unconstitutional. Korematsu argued he had contradictory orders, and, no matter what he did, he would have violated one of them. However, the United States argued that the government has different powers during peace time and war time. The government executed the orders to provide better security to the American people, and therefore the orders were constitutional.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many American citizens today do not know that during World War II, the Fascist Party in Germany were not the only ones to have concentration camps with a specific race occupying them. Between the end of 1941 till the end of the war, the United States evacuated and imprisoned around 127,000 people of Japanese ancestry. During this internment period, a supreme court case arose against Fred Korematsu where he was found guilty by a six to three verdict of trying to leave the state of California when all Japanese were prohibited from leaving and supposed to report to a relocation center. Although deemed unconstitutional today, the majority has strength in the letter of the law but weakness in racial prejudice; the dissenting argument has strength with using the Constitution but is weak in explaining military actions; and finally the line that should be clear before being crossed with "military necessity." To gain further insight on the subject it would be best to explore the majorities strengths and weakness first.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    FindLaw. (June 17, 1976 Decided). U.S. Supreme Court, KLEPPE v. NEW MEXICO, 426 U.S. 529 (1976). Retrieved from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin-getcase.pl?court=us&vol=426&invol=529…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from sblog.s3.amaxonaws.com Academic database < http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/11-9307-Henderson-v.-U.S.-Petition.pdf>…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214). The danger the United States were under, were that the Japanese Americans possibly spying for the Japanese Empire, gathering intelligence and photos of strategic places in the United States. Justice Black says that Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race, but because we are at war with the Japanese Empire. (Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214). Justice Frank Murphy argued that the exclusion at issue here goes over the brink of…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franklin Roosevelt was arguably one of the most influential people in America during World War II. When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor over two years after the war started, Roosevelt had a difficult and important decision to make. Fears and anxieties broke out among the U.S. people that the Japanese living in the United States would sabotage America and turn against them in the war. A couple of months after the U.S. started fighting in the war, Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 which required all people of Japanese descent to abandon their homes and move into relocation centers, most commonly known as internment camps, for the remainder of the war. However, the decision to strip Japanese Americans from their basic civil rights and…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A redundant act of tyranny was breached upon the rights Japanese Americans based upon Executive Order 9066. This act caused the relocation of about 110,000 people with Japanese ancestry. Approximately 60% of the people that were relocated were U.S citizens with Japanese ancestry. The people that were interned would be told that they were in these camps for their own protection. Then again we must keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States felt like there was spies among us. When Executive order 9066 was signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt all Japanese American were forced to evacuate all throughout the west coast. Another thing to take into consideration is that in Hawaii no actions such as Executive Order 9066 was taken, and one third of Hawaii's population was Japanese Americans at the time. Basically all that the Executive Order 9066 did was take away innocent people's houses, businesses, and strip them of their basic rights just because of their ancestry.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article A Grave Wrong it states, “Two months later, on February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which authorized the military to designate zones in which Japanese-Americans could not live.” This quote goes to prove that even in the hardest times they still violated their, opposed to giving them a fair trial, saying that it was a military necessity. More so it was a necessity so that the Americans and soldiers could feel “safer”. The perspective of Americans changed, in the War Relocation Authority post, it states “In the first place, two thirds of the Japanese people in this country were born here and are therefore citizens - with the same rights as any of the rest of us. Where then, did Federal Government get its legal authority to uproot a whole people and transplant.” How did the president have all the power to legally take a whole group race and just intern them. Well first of all it was because of war hysteria, as well as for the very reason they were going to war with…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Equality under the law, while guaranteed to American Citizens, has hardly been enforced throughout history and many people have faced discrimination in spite of it throughout the United States.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays