Preview

Pros And Cons Of Japanese Internment Camps

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
724 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Japanese Internment Camps
Japanese internment camps.
Justice Hugo Black stated that although the exclusion order imposed hardships upon a large number of Japanese-American citizens, hardships are part of war. Justice Black goes on to say that the curtail of the civil rights of a single racial group should immediately be suspect and be looked into (Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214).That courts should subject any law that infringes on the civil rights of a racial group should be looked under the most scrutiny like as if they were looking at it threw a micro scope. Justice Black also goes on to say that when under the conditions of warfare and our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect them must be commensurate with the threatened danger. (Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214). The danger the United States were under, were that the Japanese Americans possibly spying for the Japanese Empire, gathering intelligence and photos of strategic places in the United States. Justice Black says that Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race, but because we are at war with the Japanese Empire. (Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214). Justice Frank Murphy argued that the exclusion at issue here goes over the brink of
…show more content…
For one the Japanese Empire did have contacts in the United States before the attack on Pearl Harbor, in which the contacts were able to fly over Pearl Harbor gather Intel and proceed to give it to the Japanese Empire. So it would be easier to gather all of them up to have a closer eye in what they do so something like that don’t happen like that again. So in regards to Justice Black that’s where I think he’s right in making that decision. But on the other hand I can see where Justice Murphy makes a point as well by say that they are American citizens and they should be treated like one no matter there racial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Justice Owen J. Roberts saw the situation as a clear violation of Korematsu's Constitutional rights. Roberts was quoted as saying, “ . . .it is a case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Roberts saw the discrimination in the way Executive Order 9066 was being carried out. Just as Adolph Hitler was funneling Jew into Concentration Camps in Germany, the United States was similarly doing the same thing to Japanese…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Order 9056 Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Korematsu indicated that the government was violating the Fifth Amendment which consist that no one should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. The decision in Korematsu indicates that the executive order actually violated the Bill of Rights which include some of his personal rights. Korematsu refused to leave California when he was asked to move into the military homes because he claimed that he was being deprived of his right to live freely and he indicated that the government should not have permission to make these decisions without a due process of law. The due process law is considered in certain court cases to restrict the amount of control the government has available to exercise over their citizens. Since this due process law clause was in fact found in the court case, Korematsu was arrested not due to the racism, but due to the fear of another incident happening similar to what happen in Pearl Harbor. Since he did not follow the order given by the government he had to suffer the consequences of being arrested. Based on this decision, the Supreme Court enforced the Constitution with its decision they took in Korematsu. This type of temporary segregating Japanese Americans by relocating them in interment camps was ruled constitutional. This case was successful in keeping national security and prevented other attacks to…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States was argued on October 11 and 12, 1944 and was decided on December 18, 1944 (Touro College, 1997). Justice Black delivered the Court 's opinion. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese-American citizen was arrested and convicted of staying in a "Military Area" in San Leandro, California…

    • 1908 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result, Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps, regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American citizen, refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore, he was convicted of disobeying the law. This landmark court case was deemed unconstitutional due to the violation of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This shows the depth of the stereotyping and injustice that was leveled toward Japanese Americans during this time. Our society had the responsibility of protecting all Americans, not just everyone except Japanese…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to US values this should have been an outrageous violation of rights whom American citizens should have protested about, but they didn’t because at the time most Americans saw Japanese Americans as the enemy. As with Muslims they shouldn’t have been treated as they because like any other American they have the right to practice their religion and in my opinion this was a complete violation of there rights.…

    • 321 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Korematsu V Us

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During World War II, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed Executive Order 9066 which allowed the Secretary of War to declare certain areas as "military zones" and gave the military power over the attorney general. These newly declared military zones were made in the western US and were areas "from which any or all persons could be excluded". Although the document does not specify any races or ethnic groups, later orders issued that all people of Japanese decent (even American citizens) were excluded from these military zones that included all of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii. The Japanese in these areas were forced to evacuate to Internment Camps; where they could only bring what they could carry with them and where they would stay until further notice. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen (American born) who decided to stay at his home in California during this time and was arrested for the violation of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Korematsu challenged his arrest and the case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was questioned if Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu's 14th and 5th amendment rights (right to equal protection under the law and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness). The court also questioned if Korematsu's constitutional rights were allowed to be violated due to the special circumstances of war. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government by ruling that the government was permitted to deny the Japanese of their constitutional rights because of military considerations, and that such exclusion was not beyond the war powers of congress and the president since it was done with national security in mind. Almost 40 years later after serving his sentence, Korematsu brought his case back to court filing for a writ of Coram Nobis to correct the previous ruling and achieve justice. Korematsu won this…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The court decided Korematsu was guilty of disobeying the orders by the court because ensuring American safety is more important than Korematsu’s rights. Justice Black and Justice…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many American citizens today do not know that during World War II, the Fascist Party in Germany were not the only ones to have concentration camps with a specific race occupying them. Between the end of 1941 till the end of the war, the United States evacuated and imprisoned around 127,000 people of Japanese ancestry. During this internment period, a supreme court case arose against Fred Korematsu where he was found guilty by a six to three verdict of trying to leave the state of California when all Japanese were prohibited from leaving and supposed to report to a relocation center. Although deemed unconstitutional today, the majority has strength in the letter of the law but weakness in racial prejudice; the dissenting argument has strength with using the Constitution but is weak in explaining military actions; and finally the line that should be clear before being crossed with "military necessity." To gain further insight on the subject it would be best to explore the majorities strengths and weakness first.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fred T. Korematsu

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He did minor plastic surgery on his eyes to make him look less chinese. He also changed his name to Clyde Sarah and claimed to be of Spanish and Hawaiian descent. On May 30, 1942, he was arrested and taken to San Francisco county jail. While in jail, he was visited by Ernest Besig, the director of the San Francisco office of the American Civil Liberties Union, who asked Korematsu if he was willing to become the test case to challenge the constitutionality of the government’s imprisonment of Japanese Americans. On September 8, 1942, Korematsu was convicted in federal court for violating the military orders issued under Executive Order 9066. Korematsu and his family were transferred from many camps, and to one of the 10 incarceration camps for Japanese Americans that was set up by the government. Believing the discriminatory conviction went against freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, Korematsu appealed his case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In its December 1944 landmark decision, the high court ruled against him in a 6 to 3 decision, declaring that the incarceration was not caused by racism, and was justified by the Army’s claims that Japanese Americans were radio-signaling enemy ships from shore and were prone to…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The historical circumstances surrounding the case of Korematsu v. U.S. are as follows. In the 1940’s there was a strong anti-Japanese feeling throughout all of America. There was an act passed requiring all people of Japanese heritage to relocate from restricted areas. This is because of World War II and intense hatred towards the Japanese after the attack at Pearl Harbor. Korematsu was arrested and he brought it to the Supreme Court questioning the constitutionality of order #9066 and #34 which are the reasons he was arrested. The Supreme Court’s decision on the case was that because of the circumstances of world war the president and congress had the right to violate his constitutional rights. The court…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to document 11, “Nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.” (Document 11) As shown in the fifth amendment of the Bill of Rights, it specifically says that they “cannot be deprived of life and property,” but the government ignored the law that they created because they were in war at that time. After the Pearl Harbor and the internment camp evacuation, John Coffee the Congressman realized that this was almost exactly like the Holocaust in Germany. As stated in document 7B, “Let us not make a mockery of our Bill of Rights by mistreating these folks. Let us regard them with understanding, remembering they are victims of a Japanese war machine, with the making of international policies of which they had nothing to do.” (Document 7B) As shown in the fifth amendment of the Bill of Rights it specifically says that they “cannot be deprived of life and property,” but the government ignored the law that they made because they were in war at that time. In conclusion, Japanese Internment was misunderstanding and fault because the Americans lost all of the trust from the…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History of Regret

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    After reading Houston’s memoir Farewell to Manzanar, it brings out the treatment of the government of the United States to the Japanese living in the country at the time of world war two were discriminative. In the Executive Order 9066, it is evident that the policies the government was trying to enforce were solely aimed at oppressing the Japanese. The order opened up a gap that would allow the military commanders to make the decisions on who should be evacuated from the military area. This freedom led to the Japanese being evacuated to concentration camps since they were viewed as threats to the United States. Fred Korematsu was charged with defying military orders to evacuate and detained. According to him, he had not committed any crime to warrant him to be charged. More to that, Korematsu was born in the United States and is thus a citizen of the United States. By arresting him, the government had violated his rights as a citizen of the United States. When he tried to defend himself at the Supreme Court, the judgment passed overlooked the provisions in the law for him as a citizen. This is because it had violated the fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendments. The fourth amends requires that everyone be accorded the right to be secure with everything that belongs to them. It is provided that they shall not be subjected to unreasonable investigation, detention and also any violations of whatsoever nature unless with conclusive evidence. The Fifth Amendment provides for a person’s freedom in the United States to be respected and if it is to be withdrawn then there has to be a legal process to do as such. The fourteenth amendment states that any an individual who is a United States citizen either through birth or by naturalization remains to be a citizen. The government thus is not in a capacity to authorize any laws that will deprive any citizens of their rights or invulnerability as citizens of…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discrimination of a single race in a country known as the “melting pot,” is hard to justify. However, in the midst of war, with high tension and a severe case of paranoia, President Roosevelt made an executive decision. Moving, or forcing, Japanese-American citizens to interment camps is seen as a cruel, racist act of pure hatred and retaliation, when in reality it was a cautious decision made by a defensive country. There are definite reasons why interment camps are perceived as wrong, but the reasons for why it was justified are just as apparent. It is obvious that discrimination is wrong, but just as if one has to kill in pursuit of self –defense, murder is never right but sometimes justified.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II was a tragic international incident. Among those involved included the red, white, and blue eagle herself, America. During the events of World War II, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor of the United States. The U.S.’s retorted back with two atomic bombs and a plan to exclude people, including citizens, of Japanese ancestry in the States. The country that boasts freedom and is in some eyes, the embodiment of freedom, decided to segregate Japanese-Americans to concentration camps, away from their homes and work on the West Coast. They fear that the Japanese-Americans would side with Japan or work with them, resulting in their removal. The governmental enforcement of the migration of persons of Japanese ancestry is unconstitutional and unjust.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays