Preview

The Anti-Trust Act

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Anti-Trust Act
Anti-Trust Act Fear is usually associated with dogs or drowning; however, the fear that over took America over a century ago was the fear of big companies . Big companies were a huge threat to American economy. Anti-Trust acts were initiated to dissolve and prevent monopolies from forming in America. A monopoly is when a company or a group of people get so powerful that they control the market of a specific product or industry. This issue started in America in the 1800s after the civil war; the American government was in tune to this problem and tries to stop it by passing the Antitrust Act. Congress passed the antirust acts of 1890 and 1914. America’s end goal is to have a free enterprising system, which is having limited government restrictions …show more content…
In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was initiated as the, “Protect[ion of] trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies”. The he federal government was allowed to get involved with this issue was because it was an interstate matter. The Sherman Act prohibits anticompetitive conduct on all American soil. Later, in 1914, the Clayton Antitrust was passed. This act was passed because congress was dealing with matters that fell right outside the scope of the Sherman Antitrust Act . This act extended the jurisdiction of congress by adding some key elements. One, it is unlawful to “discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities, which commodities are sold for use… within the United States or any Territory…, where the effect of such discrimination may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce”. Two, “that discrimination in price between purchasers of commodities on account of differences in the grade, quality, or quantity of the commodity sold, or that makes only due allowance for difference in the cost of selling or transportation, or discrimination in price in the same or different communities made in good faith to meet competition”. The Clayton Act has over twenty sections and each section contains the words “Action done to prevent or lesson competition” numerously in various ways. America wants …show more content…
A monopoly means, taking over an industry by creating trusts or agreements with other smaller companies to ensure the prosperity of their own business. A monopoly conviction requires proof of the individual having the “intent to monopolize with the power and ability to monopolize, regardless of whether the individual actually exercised the power” . Congress wants to make sure that no monopoly will ever take place so as long as the person has the ability to make a monopoly, congress wants to stop them . This is done in various ways. One is called predatory pricing . This is when a company drops their prices so low, making the choice clear for consumers to buy from them, which causes a competing business to be destroyed due to lack of costumers. Another way of controlling the market is by price fixing . Price fixing is when a company or companies set and maintain a rate of their goods at a certain standard. Try arrangements are also prohibited; this is an agreement between a buyer and a seller . The seller will only give the buyer his purchase on condition that the buyer must buy other products from the seller or not buy certain products from another seller. Even firms have regulations. A firm cannot refuse to help another firm for the purpose of controlling the market . Many of the times, companies are only in trouble if there is a ruling of reason scrutiny; which means, if it is proven that a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    egt1 task3

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An oligopoly is a market form in which a market or industry is dominated by a small number of sellers. An oligopoly has the ability to determine its own price and output. (McConnell 164) Industrial regulation is used to reduce the market power of monopolies. It’s also used to reduce the market power of oligopolies, prevent collusion and increase market competition. A pure monopoly is a market structure in which only one…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monopoly occurs when a company has such a large portion of the product market that it can set its own price despite the market equilibrium. Monopolies date back to Standard Oil Co. Inc. in 1870. Standard Oil Co. Inc. controlled also the entire oil market in its time and made huge profits by doing so. The Sherman Antitrust Act was put in place to combat monopolies and their power in the marketplace.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clayton Antitrust Act

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This Act was mainly a modification and expansion of the already existent federal antitrust law, as a result of the Sherman Act. Clayton Act prescribed changes which were substantive and complementary to the Sherman Antitrust Act. The entire focus of the Clayton Antitrust act was to capture and nip the anti competitive market practices in the bud. This meant that some types of market conducts were to be prohibited. There are primarily 4 sections of this act which suggested major changes in the Sherman act. The following aspects were laid down by the Clayton Act. These are -…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It ruins the natural competition of the economy, and forces competitors and consumers to often pay unfair prices for their goods. The history of anti-trust legislation has been a bit confusing, as it Congress has found it very difficult to establish what exactly is illegal and what situations the various legislations apply to versus which are acceptable. All in all, anti-trust legislation has been very important to the history of the United States economy, for without them there would be a number of monopolies still present, controlling various industries with possible harmful…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT 1936 USA LAW BUS 5110 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING PROJECT GROUP G5 INSTRUCTOR: - DR PROSPER TURKO BY BUKASA KABONGO SERAPHIN HOSSAM SIYAM MOHAMED SALEH PAUL LEMI HISTORY AND DEFINITION The Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, also referred to as the “Anti-Price Discrimination Act,” is a part of United States federal law that prohibits producers of products from participating in anticompetitive practices. The act specifically limits price discrimination and it is an amendment to the Clayton Antitrust Act, which was the first law of its kinds to prevent unfair price discrimination.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Clayton antitrust act was passed in 1914. The act was drafted by Alabama Democrat Henry De Lamar Clayton. President Wilson instructed congress to come up with the act when he went into office in 1912. Wilson felt as though large companies had too many freedoms. The Act was put into effect to prohibit anticompetitive price discrimination, prohibit against certain tying and exclusive deal practices, expand power to private parties to sue and obtain triple damages, labor exemption that permitted union organizing, prohibition against ant compatible mergers. Company mergers have to go through the Federal Trade Commission and The Department of Justice for regulation to be approached. It is not uncommon for a merger to be disapproved. Like…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    BUSN-115 Week 3 Assignment

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first antitrust law, the Sherman Act, was passed in 1890 and together with a pair of laws passed in 1914, the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Act, forms the core antitrust laws still in effect today. The Sherman Act outlaws monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize, as well as, restraint on trade. It was ruled by the Supreme Court that not all restraint on trade is outlawed, only unreasonable restraint on trade. Examples of this would be price fixing or the rigging of bids.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to stop the establishment of monopolies, the Sherman Antitrust law was passed in 1890 by Congress. The Supreme Court made the decision that contracts would be illegal if they formed an “unreasonable restraint of trade.” The Sherman Antitrust law “ provides that no person shall monopolize, attempt to monopolize or conspire with another to monopolize interstate or foreign trade or commerce,…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clayton Act of 1914, sought nothing but to simply strengthen the Sherman Act of 1890. This act, however, forbade corporations from receiving stock of others if doing so created monopolies; If an company broke the law, its officials could be tried and…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, amended by the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, prohibits discrimination among customers through pricing and disallows mergers, acquisitions or takeovers of one firm by another if the effect will "substantially lessen competition.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sherman Act Of 1890

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    375). In response to monopolies, cartels, and trusts, Congress passed two major pieces of legislation: the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. The Sherman Act is a federal statute passed in 1890. It was the first major legislation passed to address oppressive business practices associated with cartels and oppressive monopolies. The Clayton Act of 1914 simply sharpened and clarified the general provisions of the Sherman Act and regulates practices that are deemed harmful to fair competition; price fixing, exclusive contracts, tying agreements, mergers and acquisitions. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 prohibits unfair methods, acts, and practices of competition in interstate commerse. But more than anything, it established the Federal Trade Commission to police violation of the act and to enforce the Clayton and Federal Trade Commission Acts, as well. The Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950 amended the Clayton Act and targets mergers where companies purchase suppliers, and occasionally competitor 's suppliers, in order to secure production. It added vertical mergers and conglomerate mergers to the possible list of antitrust violations. REGULATORY COMMISSIONS OF INDUSTRIAL…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    14. The Sherman Anti-trust Act was passed by Congress so that it would avoid a monopoly that would destroy the market.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust Laws Effective

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States has several laws that are intended to further fair, balanced, and competitive business practices. These laws are typically effective as control measures to ensure fair business practices are followed. Determining the success or failure of specific legislation or regulations can be relative to what angle you are looking from. With these anti-trust laws we are insured safeness from unreasonable trade, price discrimination, and unfair and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    De Beers

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2. U. S. Antitrust Law 2.1 History and Motivation 2.1.1 The Sherman Act 2.1.2 The Clayton Act 2.2 Extraterritoriality…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Competition Good

    • 6222 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Abstract. This paper addresses the rationale for antitrust legislation. It is a striking fact that the legitimacy of antitrust law has been taken for granted in the United States ever since the Sherman Act of 1890 and, until the advent of the so-called Chicago School, it was even taken for granted by conservative American economists. Europeans, on the other hand, have always been lukewarm about legal action against trusts and cartels and this attitude is found right across the political spectrum in most European countries. Nevertheless, in both the U.S.A. and Europe, the ultimate justification for antitrust law derives from economic doctrine regarding the beneficial effects of competition. But what exactly are these beneficial effects and how secure is the contention of economists that competition is always superior to monopoly? Surprisingly enough, competition, that central concept of economics, is widely misunderstood by many economists, both as a market phenomenon and as an organizing principle of economic reasoning.…

    • 6222 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays