Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

“The Assyrian Empire vs, The Phoenician Empire”

Good Essays
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“The Assyrian Empire vs, The Phoenician Empire”
“The Assyrian Empire vs, The Phoenician Empire” Within the Assyrian and the Phoenician Empires there was truly a contrast in their institutions, goals and values. While the Phoenicians conducted a society based on trade and religion, the Assyrians mainly focused on expansion and control. Moreover, both empires had their strengths and weakness within their respected societies. During this time period the Phoenician and Assyrian empires differed in just about every aspect of society. While the Assyrians were an absolute ambitions empire that sought out territorial expansion and control of trade route and cities, the Phoenicians made no attempt to build a territorial empire and focused more on the creation of trade routes and ports. Also, the Assyrian empire tok much interest in huge labor forces for agricultural work and building projects, while the Phoenicians also put more work towards the innovation of ship building and seafaring, rather than building projects and agriculture. These two empires also had an absolute contrast when it came to their goals and values. Within the Assyrian empire, there were massive armies that were well trained and ruthlessly disciplined. This not only reveals how much the Assyrian relied on conquering land but it also shows how much they valued their military. On the contrary, the Phoenicians were more of a social empire that political, much like the mesopotamians; the Phoenicians saw religion as very important along with laws, science and writing. This goes on to show that the Phoenicians valued the human ming and spirit. In addition, the Assyrian empire created a cruel propaganda machine to support and justify their system of expansion and inequality. Therefore showing how much the Assyrians truly valued their interest in expansion if they were willing to lie to their people to make it alright. In contrast, the Phoenicians saw no point in seeking to lie to their people to make it alright. In contrast the Phoenicians saw no point in seeking out new territories mostly because their coastal cities made them ideally situated to develop trade in the Mediterranean, which does to show that the sea and trade was a way of life for the Phoenicians. Also, the Assyrians has a rigid social structure that was not only made of mostly peasants but it also left women without any control of their own lives, which provides the thought that most people within the Assyrian empire were seen with no value at all. With that said, Phoenicians were more of a society based off religion and would even conduct sacrifices for their gods and at times children would also be sacrificed, which truly shows how much the Phoenicians valued their gods and religion. Moreover, the Assyrians and Phoenicians had completely opposite views of how to work a civilization. The Assyrians and Phoenicians definitely had different ways of conducting a society. Although, one was focused on expansion and the other on trading, they both made do with what they had. In Conclusion, These two Societies truly differed when it came to their institutions, goals and values.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though both nations were dynasties, they found their leaders in different ways. Mesopotamia found leaders through…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -empires included ‘Old Kingdom,’ ‘Middle Kingdom,’ ‘New Kingdom.’-a pharaoh was ruler in areas-commoners could gain statuses by government work-gained political ideas from Mesopotamian ways (which was caused/influenced by Mesopotamian conquers/settlements/explorers)…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though Ancient Egypt and Ancient Mesopotamia were different in their outlook on life and in the structure of their governments , they were similar in their interaction and trade, because they both were embedded in larger networks of commerce, culture, and power, and they both carried on long-distance trade once they were established.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persia and Greece were beautiful and prosperous empires and where the most influential of their time. In this essay I will talk about the two main empires’ political structures and their economy and I will also state similarities and differences between the two empires. The two empires’ political structures might have varied greatly but their economies were very similar. Even though they had differences and had major battles they were still the ideal empires of their time.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    han and roman empire

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    each empire differed in the sense that one suffered from foreign invasions and the other had…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. In what ways did these empires differ from one another? What accounts for those differences?…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egypt and Mesopotamia are similar because they share the same concept of having a single rule, although Egypt is a theocracy and Mesopotamia is a monarchy; and both are divided into social classes, the difference being that women in Egypt have more right than Mesopotamia.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have come up with certain criteria they believe a society must obtain in order for it to be considered a civilization. These criteria are that the society must be stratified, must contain monumental architecture, and must have a formal system of law and order. Other historians may argue that writing must be part of a society in order for it to be considered a civilization, but that is not a criterion that is certainly agreed upon. According to this definition of a civilization, I conclude that both the ancient societies of Mesopotamia and Athens can both be considered civilizations.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the life of Egypt and Mesopotamia there were similarities and differences. There are comparisons in culture, social class, and gender. Also parallelism in their religions existed however, the differences found, clearly define them as individual entities.…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mesopotamia and egypt

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt both shared many distinct qualities amongst their civilizations. For example, their polytheistic beliefs as well as a similar social structure. These two civilizations differed in numerous modes, including political authority and geography.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt was a monarchy and Mesopotamia was a democracy. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was in charge of making laws and owned everything, meanwhile, in Mesopotamia, there were many kings in different city-states and they did not own people’s belongings. A difference is that the land was measured differently. In Mesopotamia, they divided the land into city-states. Also, both civilizations thought differently about their kings. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was considered a god. Meanwhile, Mesopotamia believed that the kings weren’t gods so they didn’t worship them as gods. At one point, when the Assyrians were expanding a lot, the city-state got cut up into provinces. The ancient egyptians wrote hieroglyphics about the profits, costs and laws civilians made. In Mesopotamia, the scribes would draw pictograms on clay boards. While Egyptians trusted their justice goddess to teach right from wrong among their citizens, Mesopotamians would follow Hammurabi's law that demanded and Eye for an Eye. With this law, the offended person would be free to do the same thing he suffered at the hands of the criminal. In Mesopotamia would have a voice and a vote for city matters as going to war or not meanwhile Egypt didn’t have a voice. Everything was decided by the Pharaoh. So after all, there are differences and similarities between these dissimilar civilizations that…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neither of them had a government system like the United States has today. In Mesopotamia, priests and kings ran the cities. In Egypt pharaohs and priests were the main leaders but other wealthy people helped lead. So both civilizations had a very similar power chain. Their writing however was not the same at all. The egyptians wrote in hieroglyphs while the people of Mesopotamia wrote in cuneiform.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To conclude, Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia were different in many ways. Despite all their differences, they had similarities. These river valleys are my favourite and they were the most powerful. They found new ways of technology and shaped our world into what it is now. Without these civilizations, we would not know writing, medicine, or most of the technology we have…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Assyrians, Neo-Babylonians, and Persians are considered to be amongst the first successful civilizations of first millennium B.C. It can be argued that each civilization was better than the others in terms of treatment of common people, but that’s a issue for another essay. What we want to know right now is, why? What made their model of civilization more effective than that of previous empires?…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When comparing how Mesopotamia developed into a successful civilization with Egypt during the foundations period there are many similarities and differences. they were similar in that the rivers are what help the civilization prosper. This was because a rivers provided resources for survival. They were different in that the way their rulers maintained order because of different political systems. They were also similar in that they both constructed monumental architecture. This was because it shows the wealth and power of the civilization.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics