Preview

The Battle of Cambria

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Battle of Cambria
Several individuals closely tied to the government requested that the trial be held in Winnipeg in July 1885. There are historians who contend that the trial was moved to Regina because of concerns with the possibility of an ethnically mixed and sympathetic jury.[66] Tom Flanagan states that an amendment of the North-West Territories Act (which dropped the provision that trials with crimes punishable by death should be tried in Manitoba) meant that the trial could be convened within the North-West Territories and did not have to be held in Winnipeg.

Louis Riel testifies at his trialPrime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald ordered the trial to be convened in Regina, where Riel was tried before a jury of six English and Scottish Protestants, all from the area surrounding the city. The trial began on 28 July 1885, and lasted only five days.[3]

Riel delivered two long speeches during his trial, defending his own actions and affirming the rights of the Métis people. He rejected his lawyer's attempt to argue that he was not guilty by reason of insanity, asserting,

Life, without the dignity of an intelligent being, is not worth having.[67]
The jury found him guilty but recommended mercy; nonetheless, Judge Hugh Richardson sentenced him to death, with the date of his execution initially set for 18 September 1885.[42] Fifty years later one of the jurors, Edwin Brooks, said that Riel was tried for treason but hanged for the execution of Thomas Scott.

ExecutionBoulton writes in his memoirs that, as the date of his execution approached, Riel regretted his opposition to the defence of insanity and vainly attempted to provide evidence that he was not sane. Requests for a retrial and an appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain were denied. Sir John A. Macdonald, who was instrumental in upholding Riel's sentence, is famously quoted as saying:

He shall die though every dog in Quebec bark in his favour.[68]
Before his execution, Riel was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ThIn an 8-1 decision the Court found that Sheppard did not receive a fair trial. Noting that although freedom of expression should be given great latitude, the Court held that it must not be so broad as to divert the trial away from its primary purpose: adjudicating both criminal and civil matters in an objective, calm, and solemn courtroom setting. The blatant and hostile trial coverage by Cleveland's radio and print media, and the physical arrangement of the courtroom itself - which facilitated collaboration between the prosecution and present media - all combined to so inflame the jury people's minds against Sheppard as to deny him a fair trial. The Court concluded that the trial judge should have either postponed the proceedings or transferred them to a different…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The battle of Chelsea Creek, was a duel dispute, on May 27, 1775. This battle was between two opposing sides, in Suffolk County, Massachusetts. The 13 colonies in North America & the Kingdom of Great Britain. Leaders of the opposing forces were, John Stalk & Israel Putnam, American Colonists. Samuel Graves & Thomas Graves, British forces. American Militiamen, started this duel by, attacking Chelsea for, burning hay, animal needs, & any other thing they needed to be provided by. This lead to, the triumph for the American's &…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was acquitted by a jury several times, but the Quebec Court of Appeal overturned that acquittal and sentenced him to prison where he served 10 months at Bordeaux in Montreal. Eventually, the law changed so that a jury acquittal could no longer be overturned on appeal. There would be many more arrests; two more jury acquittals, eight raids on his clinics, one firebombing, and massive legal bills. Then, on January 28th 1988, the greatest day of his life (as he puts it) – the Supreme Court of Canada struck down Canada’s abortion law. The law required a woman who wanted an abortion to appeal to a three-doctor hospital abortion committee and on that day, it was declared…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His defence for the Smart family murders was that the father had killed the family and then himself. Although the judge was impressed with his courtroom skills he was unable to convince the jury of his innocence. They found him guilty and a few short months later he was hanged.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Tiels Trial

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Riels prosecutor was trying to convince the jury that riel led the rebellion sound mindedly.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many members of the Canadian government believed that Riel was insane, therefore not responsible for his actions due to diminished capacity. He did not refuse that he stayed at a mental hospital, but Riel said that the doctors had speculated that he was cured.…

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The defendants were allowed to offer a brief version of the events while Freisler continuously interrupted with rages, rants, and jumping to his feet. He conducted himself more as a prosecutor rather than a judge. While Sophie defended her actions, Christoph asked clemency as his wife was ill and his children would be left fatherless if he were executed.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis 16th Research Paper

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are a number of reasons to lead people to think that it was right that Louis 16th was beheaded by the blood stained blade of the guillotine. The defendants of the revolutionaries state that Louis 16th was a horrific traitor to the majority of his people. The first was that he believed in feudalism, “slavery and all sorts of things that were genuinely satanic.” The French Revolution saw peasants in the third estate rebel against an extremely corrupt tax system that caused millions of deaths and years…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both sides gave their opening statements and both were long, but really good. The prosecution side gave their statement first and they did a good job at trying to tell the jury why Friar Lawrence was guilty. The defense side gave their statement next, they had a really good speech about how Friar Lawrence was not guilty. Then came the questioning of the witness and this is the time to get all you can for your case. The prosecution questioned their first witness, then the defense questioned that witness. This happened for all the prosecution witness, then it was the defense’s witness to be questioned. The defense would call up one of their witness to the stand and began questioning him/her, then the prosecution team would get to question the…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    death by stones after not attending the plea at his arraignment (Salem Witch Trials). People were…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meursault is condemned not for the murder of the Arab but for not meeting society’s expectations…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Canadian criminal law there has been no issue more contentious than that of the confession and its admissibility in court. Prior to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the only question for the court was the reliability of a forced confession. Since 1982, the Supreme Court of Canada, through the application of the Charter, continues to redraw the rules on confessions and evidence admissibility. This paper takes the position that the manner in which a confession has been obtained has become more important than its factual reliability, based upon relevant decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada. To understand current judicial thought on admissibility of confessions, this paper will discuss historical developments in this field and the need to keep justice out of disrepute. This paper will examine several significant cases in which the courts were called upon to balance the need to convict criminals with the need to protect the rights of these same accused person granted by the Charter. Ultimately, through examination of these cases and other relevant documents such at the United Nations Convention Against Torture, this paper will conclude whether a forced but reliable pre-Charter confession discussed in R vs. Wray would be admissible in the legal landscape of today.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Crimes

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a sense the trials were as fair as they could possibly be when you have four different justice systems to try and mesh up to form one for the trials. On one side you had the British and American systems, which are fairly similar, the French which is somewhat different and the Russian which is not entirely open to the accused getting any sort of say in the outcome.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juries

    • 3519 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Bushell’s Case (1670) – jurors refused to convict Quaker activists of unlawful assembly. The trial judge would not accept the ‘not guilty’ verdict and ordered the jurors to resume their deliberations without food or drink. When the jurors persisted in their refusal to convict, the court fined them and committed them to prison until the fines were paid. On appeal, the Court of Common Pleas ordered the release of the jurors holding that jurors could not be punished for their verdict…

    • 3519 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The corruptness is proven in the Affluenza Teen case, where teenager Ethan Couch killed several while drunk driving. The attorneys that represented Couch said he had not known his actions were wrong due to his privileged upbringing. Ethan Couch received probation for killing multiple people while under the influence. Also, almost all the inmates executed on death row were too poor to afford their own attorney. The criminal justice system is not always correct; in several instances people have been wrongly convicted and later executed. Carlos Deluna was convicted of stabbing a woman to death, and he was executed in 1989 despite no evidence that he actually committed the crime. The death penalty is also unconstitutional because the eighth amendment bans cruel and unusual punishments. Many instances have proven the death penalty cruel. In Ohio, inmate Romell Broom was convicted for rape. Romell’s execution was scheduled in 2009 but didn’t work as planned. The execution team tried to execute Romell through lethal injection for two hours.”Broom said he was stuck with needles 18 times – causing such intense pain that he cried and screamed” After his painful, drawn out attempted execution they decided to reschedule his execution. In Oklahoma inmate Clayton Lockett suffered from a botched execution, the execution team had to…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays