Preview

The Blame Of The Boston Massacre In American History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Blame Of The Boston Massacre In American History
The Boston Massacre was a very significant event in American history. Although a single group cannot be blamed for the event in its entirety, the British soldiers should receive most of the blame. It should be noted, however, that the colonists did play a role in causing the incident. The actions that the British took the night of the Massacre were unnecessary. According to William Tant’s unbiased account in Primary Source #2 of what happened that night while the Bostonians were simply throwing “some more snow balls”, “instantly the soldiers fired one after another. In his recollection of the Boston Massacre, Captain Preston also included “snowballs being thrown” and how “instantly three or four soldiers fired one after another”. As a British captain, Preston would bend the facts as much to the soldiers’ favor as possible allowing one to infer that his testimony of what happened during the event would have left out certain other wrong doings of the British soldiers, making the actions of the soldiers potentially worse than what Preston admitted to. Considering that the British soldiers were firing guns and taking away lives, the throwing of snowballs by the Bostonians is minute. Taking away lives is extreme and uncomparable to getting hit by a cold ball of frozen water. As demonstrated through Primary Source #5 which is Paul …show more content…

He states that, “Judgement of Death against those Soldiers would have been as foul a Stain upon this Country as the Executions of the Quakers or Witches.” He then continues to say, “This however, is no Reason why the Town should not call the Action of that Night a Massacre”. In other words, Adams recognizes that the soldiers could not have been entirely blamed for the event since the Bostonians provoked them to do so, but also that they took matters too far by murdering the Bostonians who were simply throwing snowballs at

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The details regarding what followed have always been the source of debate, but that evening, a group of Bostonians approached a guard in front of the customs house and started taunting him. The situation quickly escalated. When a contingent of British redcoats came to the defense of their fellow soldier, more angry Bostonians joined the fracas, throwing snowballs and other items at the troops.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From this excerpt, we can see how Britain didn’t mean to make a “massacre”. A crowd of Boston boys and men surrounded a number of British soldiers and began taunting and cursing them while pelting them with snowballs. This was the reason of the Boston “massacre”.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Massacre Dbq

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Document 3, Account of the Boston Massacre, “A townsman with a cudgel struck him over the hands with such force…” This writing means that the colonists had clubs to fight back against the British and protect themselves. Although the British had much more powerful weapons, such as guns, the colonist were able to bring much harm to them as well. In Benjamin Edes’, Account of the Boston Massacre, a colonist “aimed a blow at the Captain’s head which grazed his hat and fell pretty heavy upon his arm”. A massacre is defined as an event where a large amount of people are killed and the victims cannot defend themselves. The fact that the colonists had clubs to defend themselves, proves the point that this event was not a massacre. As mentioned…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston massacre was the first battle of the american revolution. Paul Revere wanted to get more people to be on their side so that they could go to war with Britain to gain their freedom. So that they didn’t have to by the tea that went along with the tea act passed by parliament.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The very next day we were told to leave the Boston by the Gov.Hutchinson .All the people of the Boston came on the street to insult and curse us .On march 13, the colony attorney general issued 13 indictments for murder. We were accused that the murder was all planned and all of us had revenge in hearts. In March 6 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Captain Thomas Preston and the officer in charge of the troops who did the shooting .Me and other seven soldiers under Preston’s command were clapped into prison later the same day. In a particular witness testified that one or two weeks before shooting , Pvt Killroy had said that “ he would never miss an opportunity ,if he had one to fire on the Boston people .…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre, the event that both gathered the most support for independence and shocked the colonists in to fear. On March 5, 1770, a mob of townspeople started throwing rock and snow at the guards outside the customs house. The end result was British soldiers firing into the mob killing five and wounding multiple others. After this attack the people had enough, parliament had just passed The Tea Act and the Sons of Liberty had some revenge to get. “On a cold December night, radical townspeople stormed the ships and tossed 342 chests of tea into the water.”…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was an unfortunate event which could have clearly been prevented if taken the right precautions and made the right decisions at the right time. According to my text book, the massacre was an attempt at protest against the British soldiers taking over the colonists’ jobs. If the soldiers had followed instructions, if Britain had paid the soldiers more, and if Crispus Attucks had taken a more peaceful approach to this problem, things might’ve gone differently.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists were throwing snowballs, sticks, and even stones at the soldiers. Furious the soldiers fired into the group of people, at that piont 3 people were killed and 8 people were badly injured. So, Captain Thomas Preston was taken on a trail there, John Adams and Josiah Quincey defend Captain Preston…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The film’s depiction of the trial differed from the article in the sense that, the men were found guilty of manslaughter, not let go free and the Boston Massacre’s trial was much longer in the article. In the docudrama, once John Adams had defended the soldiers and won the trial, it was shown as if they were able to just walk away from the scene. However, many complications came before they were let go without a death penalty. Also, in the article, the trial of this case occurred seven months after the trial, allowing much anxious uproar to arise around the town.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 5th 1770 Boston citizens weary of being living in a city under siege for more than a year had found itself in a standoff with a platoon of British soldiers at town hall on King Street young colonists began to taunt the cold, short tempered redcoats and eventually snowballs started to be thrown at the soldiers. More citizens gathered and eventually balls of ice started to be thrown at the troops. During the tense standoff a rifle discharged and moments later five citizens were dead and others injured. (Irvin, 87). Adams would not let this opportunity to pass him by.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston massacre supports Paine’s ideas in a huge way. It shows just what he talks about in his writings, how the British are too controlling over the colonists, to the point that they are killing their men.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Massacre DBQ

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Probably one of the most important reasons why the British are to blame for the Boston Massacre is their unnecessary behavior. The British Troops killed or wounded American citizens unexpectedly and irrationally (Doc B). This account of events is consistent throughout many other documents, and is the horrible truth. The Americans simply taunted a few of the soldiers who were already out of line. The throwing of rocks and calling of names is not a valid reason to kill.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which wasn’t much of a massacre than just a couple fatalities in a fight. The so-called ‘massacre’ started when a group of colonists crowded around stationed British soldiers and started taunting them, calling them ‘lobster backs’ (because of their red coats) and throwing snowballs at them. The soldiers were angered at this, of course, and shot into the crowd. The colonists were egging the soldiers on, and they were armed! What did they think, that the soldiers wouldn’t shoot or get angry?…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays