Preview

The Blind Watchmaker: Film Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Blind Watchmaker: Film Analysis
Dawkins first appeared on television in 1986 in a documentary called Nice Guys Finish First. After that, he was asked to film in a second documentary called The Blind Watchmaker; both documentaries were based off of content from his first two books. Dawkins was later asked to make many other documentaries, while also accepting many opportunities to debate in public settings. When people think of a naturalist position, or even someone in popular cultural who professes to be an atheist, people often think of Richard Dawkins. In 2006 he came out with a book called The God Delusion; which is now the book that he is best known for. The God Delusion lays out the reasons why Dawkins believes God is not real and evil. Just as there are no …show more content…
If there is something that appears to life beyond the natural world as it is now imperfectly understood, we hope eventually to understand it and embrace it within the natural.
Dawkins, being a naturalist, does not believe in any deity––which means the universe is all there is. In The Blind Watchmaker, Dr. Dawkins comments:
To explain the origin of the DNA/protein machine by invoking a supernatural Designer is to explain precisely nothing, for it leaves unexplained the origin of the Designer. You have to say something like ‘God was always there’, and if you allow yourself that kind of lazy way out, you might as well say ‘DNA was always there’, or ‘Life was always there’, and be done with it.
Again he says, “The universe we observe had…no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference.” Which also answers the next question: what is Dawkins view of external reality? In essence, Richard Dawkins answers that he believes the universe is all there is. Dawkins states there is “nothing beyond the natural, physical world.” He is a proponent of what scientist call “The Big Bang
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Descartes Mind/Body Dualism
    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of Descartes Mind/Body Dualism

    Descartes, like the crew on the Nebuchadnezzar, has faith that a divine being is the author of the universe. But he asks: “...who can give me the assurance that this God has not arranged that there should be no earth, no heaven,…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response to Dawkins Ironic Hypocrisy
    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Response to Dawkins Ironic Hypocrisy

    James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    THEO 104 WEEK 3 STUDY NOTES
    • 1142 Words
    • 4 Pages

    THEO 104 WEEK 3 STUDY NOTES

    This view basically claims that God began the process of evolution within the context of created matter. Though God programmed the system, simple life forms were allowed to evolve into more complex life structures. During this entire process, God withdrew Himself from His creation, and allowed the ordained natural laws to guide the creative process. In this view, God is Creator of everything.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Richard Dawkins And Jerry Coyne: Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Dawkins And Jerry Coyne: Rhetorical Analysis

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    C. S. Lewis Argument For The Existence Of God?
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    C. S. Lewis Argument For The Existence Of God?

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evolution In Richard Dawkins's River Out Of Eden
    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evolution In Richard Dawkins's River Out Of Eden

    Throughout the first section of Richard Dawkins’s River Out of Eden, mainly in Chapters 1 and 3, Dawkins discusses how evolution, itself, is gradual. “Do good by stealth. A key feature of evolution is its gradualness” (Dawkins 83). Gradualism in evolution is looked at in depth in both Chapter One, entitled The Digital River, and Chapter Three, entitled Do Good by Stealth, where Dawkins elaborates on the topic even further. Dawkins, a man of somewhat argumentative nature, is quick to shoot down false claims made my Creationists in these chapters, where he uses solid evidence in the scientific world in order to support his view of gradual evolution. Even though the topic of evolution is often a touchy subject, Dawkins dives head first…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Blind Watchmaker Simulation
    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Blind Watchmaker Simulation

    In this lab simulation, we studied the different factors that go into natural selection. These factors were things such as: fertility, the complexity of genes, the use of natural selection versus not using it, and the rate of mutation. All of these things would then affect the amount of generations it would take to get the “target phrase.” This target phrase was used as a tool to understand the complexity of some genes compared to the simplicity of others. The first chapter in Dawkins’ book, “The Blind Watchmaker,” correlates the most when it comes to what we studied in the lab. In the first chapter, he describes that complex things such as animals must have been made by design. However, he also explains that this designer is…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Through Deaf Eyes Summary
    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through Deaf Eyes Summary

    It was interesting to hear, and see, what kind of challenges that deaf people faced. One of the people I found interesting was. A hearing French professor had brought the language from France and that was how it signing had started. I thought that was interesting, because not only was it a long time to create a form of communication for the deaf community; they were also mistreated for their inability to communicate with the rest of the world. Another person that I found interesting, was Alexander Gram Bell, had a wife and mother, who were deaf. On top of that, it was startling at first, to hear that the deaf community treated him as a sort of “boogeyman.” I found it fascinating that he is well known in a hearing class for inventing the telephone, but in the deaf class, he is known for starting the Oralism form of communication in the deaf community. Along with that, Bell fought against having sign language being taught, because he felt that it was a “borrowed language.” Instead he wanted the people community to learn to speak and read lips. It was interesting to hear, because I assumed that most people who were deaf just learned sign language for their communication.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Richard Dawkins Refute Creationism?
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Richard Dawkins Refute Creationism?

    Although he does not order the objects by intelligence, the examples show a strong recursive relationship among them. Humans are the cleverest among birds, fish and swaps, while birds have bigger brains than fish and fish have bigger brains and better eyesight than swaps. Initially, Dawkins makes a very simple and real-life example: “the stuntman’s resemblance to the star is usually extremely superficial, but in the fleeting action shot it is enough to fool an audience” (Dawkins 62). Despite the fact that humans have the most developed brains among all the tellurians and the best eyesight among vertebrates, we cannot say that we are hard to be fooled. In fact, we are much easier to be fooled than we imagine. This example should be considered as a foreshadowing before Dawkins officially refutes the minister’s statement by using scientific experiments which makes the audiences or the opponents realize that we should put ourselves in the object’s position instead of using our own judgment arbitrarily. Dawkins further explains his reason by an example of insects: “It is known that insect eyes see the world in a completely different way from our eyes. The great Austrian zoologist Karl von Frisch discovered as a young man that they are blind to red light but they can see—and see as its own distinct hue—ultraviolet light, to which we are blind” (Dawkins…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    L03 Task 3
    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    L03 Task 3

    Explain existing working practices such as communication skills and others and how strategies are designed to minimise abuse in health and social care contexts.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess sociological explanations of science and ideology as belief systems

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess sociological explanations of science and ideology as belief systems

    Science has had a huge impact on society in the past few centuries with medicines curing disastrous diseases and the growing success of technology. This success has led to a widespread belief in science; believing science can deliver well to the people in society. However, this success has been dimmed by science causing problems; for example global warming and pollution as these are both products of science. However the good and bad effects of science show features distinguishing it from other belief systems as it enables us to explain predict and control the world in a way that non-scientific or pre scientific belief systems cannot do. Science is a belief system as it fills the gaps which ideology and religion cannot fill and science also makes sense of the world around us. An example of this is science explains why earth is the perfect environment for humans to live on. However, Rationalists point out that science is based on fact, whereas beliefs are not: they rely on faith. Therefore, Rationalists argue that science is not a belief system. Dawkins put forward that science is based on evidence so science cannot be a belief system. Whereas some people use science to explain the world but we need to have faith in science, an example of this can be in regards to cures for cancer. Therefore people have faith in system and would claim science is a…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    response to Being an Atheist
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    response to Being an Atheist

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Chapter Summary Of 'The Greatest Show On Earth'
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chapter Summary Of 'The Greatest Show On Earth'

    In order to say that an idea is more than a theory, we must first understand the many definitions of the word “theory”. Dawkins says that two of the definitions are of importance here. In the first definition, theory is described as an accepted idea that explains facts and it has been confirmed or proven. The second definition describes theory as a hypothesis or idea used to try to explain facts, an explanation through a personal view. Dawkins says that scientists use the first definition and creationists use the second.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Film Analysis: The Blind Side
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Film Analysis: The Blind Side

    Why do you think this film is called “The Blind Side? ( i.e. who has a blind side and why?)…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More