The Boy In The Striped Pajamas Good Essay
Good or Bad?
Good or bad, Was it is good or bad that Bruno was naive of the Holocaust?. Bruno, a 9 year old German boy was naive about the Holocaust because Father didn’t want Bruno to know about what happens on the other side of the fence because he wanted Bruno to feel comfortable at out-with and not want to move back to Berlin because of the Holocaust which is “a Jewish sacrificial offering that is burned completely on an altar”. In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, it was good that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust throughout the novel because it allowed him to develop a friendship with Shmuel and it made him want to stay at Out-With instead of Berlin.
In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, it was good that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust because it allowed him to develop a friendship with Shmuel. If he were to find out about …show more content…
This is one reason why it is good that Bruno was naive.
In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, it was good that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust because it made him want to stay at Out-With instead of Berlin.Bruno is good without knowing because he would have run away maybe if he knew.Bruno would have never met Shmuel if he knew.Bruno wouldn’t want to explore anymore if he knew.This is the second reason of why it was good that Bruno was naive.
On the other hand, others believe it was bad that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust throughout the novel. He would have kept living instead of dying in the gas chamber and he would have stayed away from the fence. But those people are wrong because if Bruno wasn’t naive about what happens on the other side of the fences because he would have tried to save Shmuel and he could have got Shmuel in big trouble and it was good for their friendship if Bruno was naive that is good that Bruno was
Good or bad, Was it is good or bad that Bruno was naive of the Holocaust?. Bruno, a 9 year old German boy was naive about the Holocaust because Father didn’t want Bruno to know about what happens on the other side of the fence because he wanted Bruno to feel comfortable at out-with and not want to move back to Berlin because of the Holocaust which is “a Jewish sacrificial offering that is burned completely on an altar”. In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, it was good that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust throughout the novel because it allowed him to develop a friendship with Shmuel and it made him want to stay at Out-With instead of Berlin.
In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, it was good that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust because it allowed him to develop a friendship with Shmuel. If he were to find out about …show more content…
This is one reason why it is good that Bruno was naive.
In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, it was good that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust because it made him want to stay at Out-With instead of Berlin.Bruno is good without knowing because he would have run away maybe if he knew.Bruno would have never met Shmuel if he knew.Bruno wouldn’t want to explore anymore if he knew.This is the second reason of why it was good that Bruno was naive.
On the other hand, others believe it was bad that Bruno was naive about the Holocaust throughout the novel. He would have kept living instead of dying in the gas chamber and he would have stayed away from the fence. But those people are wrong because if Bruno wasn’t naive about what happens on the other side of the fences because he would have tried to save Shmuel and he could have got Shmuel in big trouble and it was good for their friendship if Bruno was naive that is good that Bruno was