The Brownlow Committee (1947-1949)

The endeavors to change the authoritative hardware of the government have been fragmented victories, best case scenario for a few reasons. Many commissions (or boards of trustees) have been made by pioneers to deal with the numerous issues confronting constituents and discover arrangements by evaluating the current circumstances.

The Brownlow Committee, which was named after the administrator Louis Brownlow, gave the principal formal appraisal of government associations from an administrative point of view in a report in light of the consistent battle for hierarchical control. The report, called the Brownlow Report, contained recommendations prescribing a noteworthy rearrangement of the official branch. This suggestion was acknowledged by the President and submitted to Congress in 1938. But since Congress felt that the administration would have excessively energy of the Supreme Court, murdered the bill. After a few changes were made, it was resubmitted and gone by Congress to wind up noticeably the Reorganization Act of 1939. This law made the Executive Office of the President and approved the president to get ready future redesign plans that is liable to a sometime later congressional veto. Despite the fact that Congress was thinking about a great deal to the board's recommendations, there were still others that was against the expanded forces of the
Rather they concentrated on reinforcing the official branch by revamping organizations so that there would be a particular reason for every division. The commission was viewed as a win on the grounds that 72 percent of its proposals (196 out of 273) were embraced, including the section of the Reorganization Act of 1949 and the foundation of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare in 1953 (Shafritz et. al,